Critical duration, the differential luminance threshold, critical flicker frequency, and visual adaptation: a theoretical treatment.

A quantitative model formally analogous to an electrical filter containing a cascade of RC elements with output-controlled variation of time constant (parametric feedback) is shown to predict the relations between the differential luminance threshold, critical duration, critical flicker frequency, and adapting luminance in human psychophysical data; the model also treats some of the properties of frequency-response characteristics for sinusoidally-modulated flicker. Critical duration in human luminance discrimination and membrane resistance recorded from eccentric cells in Limulus both follow the same decreasing function of adapting luminance that is predicted by the model. Fitting the model to luminance discrimination and to CFF data requires a constant increment of peripheral neural response at threshold rather than a constant ratio to ongoing peripheral activity. A hypothesis regarding central neural adaptation provides a bridge between the latter result and signal/noise theories of visual discrimination.

[1]  W A Rushton,et al.  Bleached rhodopson and visual adaptation. , 1965, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  V. Lloyd,et al.  A comparison of critical fusion frequencies for different areas in the fovea and periphery. , 1952, The American journal of psychology.

[3]  C. H. Graham,et al.  Nerve impulses from single receptors in the eye , 1932 .

[4]  W A RUSHTON,et al.  A theoretical treatment of Fuortes's observations upon eccentric cell activity in Limulus , 1959, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  M. Murakami,et al.  The early and late receptor potentials of monkey cones and rods. , 1965, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[6]  H. K. Hartline,et al.  Spatial and temporal aspects of retinal inhibitory interaction. , 1963, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[7]  M. Keller.  The relation between the critical duration and intensity in brightness discrimination. , 1941 .

[8]  R. Ross.  The Fusion Frequency in Different Areas of the Visual Field: III. Foveal Fusion Frequency and the Light-Dark Ratio for Constant Retinal Illumination at Fusion , 1938 .

[9]  D. H. Kelly.  Visual response to time-dependent stimuli. I. Amplitude sensitivity measurements. , 1961, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[10]  R. Devoe.  A Nonlinear Model for Transient Responses from Light-Adapted Wolf Spider Eyes , 1967, The Journal of general physiology.

[11]  T. Tomita.  The nature of action potentials in the lateral eye of the horseshoe crab as revealed by simultaneous intra- and extracellular recording. , 1956, The Japanese journal of physiology.

[12]  C. H. Graham,et al.  BRIGHTNESS DISCRIMINATION AS A FUNCTION OF THE DURATION OF THE INCREMENT IN INTENSITY , 1938, The Journal of general physiology.

[13]  J W GEBHARD,et al.  Pupil size as determined by adapting luminance. , 1952, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[14]  P. Graziadei.  Sensory receptor cells and related neurons in cephalopods. , 1965, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[15]  R. Marimont.  Numerical studies of the Fuortes‐Hodgkin Limulus model. , 1965, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat's striate cortex , 1959, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  H B BARLOW,et al.  THE ROLE OF AFTERIMAGES IN DARK ADAPTATION. , 1964, Science.

[18]  R. M. Herrick.  Foveal luminance discrimination as a function of the duration of the decrement or increment in luminance. , 1956 .

[19]  J. Levinson,et al.  One-stage model for visual temporal integration. , 1966, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[20]  Mitsuo Ikeda,et al.  Study of Flicker by Increment Threshold Technique , 1961 .

[21]  E F MACNICHOL,et al.  The peripheral origin of nervous activity in the visual system. , 1952, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[22]  H. D. L. Dzn.  Relationship between Critical Flicker-Frequency and a Set of Low-Frequency Characteristics of the Eye , 1954 .

[23]  C. H. Graham,et al.  Areal effects in foveal brightness discrimination. , 1951, Journal of experimental psychology.

[24]  V. Lloyd,et al.  Role of the light-dark ratio as a determinant of the flicker-fusion threshold. , 1960, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[25]  C. G. Mueller,et al.  Quantum concepts in visual intensity-discrimination. , 1950, The American journal of psychology.

[26]  M. Fuortes,et al.  Visual responses in Limulus. , 1965, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[27]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  Changes in time scale and sensitivity in the ommatidia of Limulus , 1964, The Journal of physiology.

[28]  M. Fuortes.  Initiation of impulses in visual cells of Limulus , 1959, The Journal of physiology.

[29]  Cone Ra.  The early receptor potential of the vertebrate eye. , 1965 .

[30]  L MATIN,et al.  Binocular summation at the absolute threshold of peripheral vision. , 1962, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[31]  K. J. W. Craik,et al.  The effect of adaptation on subjective brightness , 1940, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B - Biological Sciences.

[32]  B. H. Crawford.  Visual adaptation in relation to brief conditioning stimuli , 1947, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B - Biological Sciences.