A MULTIPLE MICROPHONE RECORDING TECHNIQUE FOR THE GENERATION OF VIRTUAL ACOUSTIC IMAGES

A new recording technique based on multichannel digital signal processing is suggested. The system uses a dummy-head that is modeled as a rigid sphere with two pairs of microphones mounted on opposite sides of the sphere in the horizontal plane. Reversals—front back confusion, is a well-known phenomenon when localizing virtual acoustic images produced by either headphones or loudspeakers. Reproduction with two loudspeakers to the front of the listener causes rear virtual acoustic images to be perceived primarily at “mirrored” angles in the frontal hemisphere. The problem is tackled here by using a multichannel signal processing technique rather than by mimicking accurately the acoustomechanical properties of a human head. The acoustic signals which are recorded at the microphones are filtered by a 4×4 matrix of digital filters before being transmitted via four loudspeakers. The performance of the system is investigated by means of computer simulations, objective measurements, and also by subjective experiments in an anechoic environment, where the listeners are asked to localize the perceived angle of the signals which were prerecorded with the sphere dummy-head. Successful discrimination of reversals is achieved primarily due to the dominant role of the interaural time delay (ITD) for localization at low frequencies, but the accuracy with which listeners can localize virtual acoustic images is reduced in comparison to a conventional two-ear dummy-head (e.g., KEMAR) with a two-loudspeaker arrangement. The system is robust with respect to head rotations—virtual acoustic images do not disappear and localization ability improves when listeners use small head rotations.

[1]  Henrik Møller Fundamentals of binaural technology , 1991 .

[2]  Hareo Hamada,et al.  Fast deconvolution of multichannel systems using regularization , 1998, IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process..

[3]  F L Wightman,et al.  Headphone simulation of free-field listening. I: Stimulus synthesis. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  P. Damaske,et al.  Head‐Related Two‐Channel Stereophony with Loudspeaker Reproduction , 1971 .

[5]  O. Kirkeby,et al.  Local sound field reproduction using digital signal processing , 1996 .

[6]  Philip A. Nelson Active Control Of Acoustic Fields And The Reproduction Of Sound , 1994 .

[7]  Dorte Hammershøi,et al.  Binaural Technique: Do We Need Individual Recordings? , 1996 .

[8]  U Burandt,et al.  Anthropometric contribution to standardising manikins for artificial-head microphones and to measuring headphones and ear protectors. , 1991, Applied ergonomics.

[9]  John Vanderkooy,et al.  Transfer-Function Measurement with Maximum-Length Sequences , 1989 .

[10]  Duane H. Cooper,et al.  Prospects for Transaural Recording , 1989 .

[11]  Felipe Orduña-Bustamante,et al.  Multi-Channel Signal Processing Techniques in the Reproduction of Sound , 1992 .

[12]  F. Wightman,et al.  The dominant role of low-frequency interaural time differences in sound localization. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  J. Hebrank,et al.  Spectral cues used in the localization of sound sources on the median plane. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  G. F. Kuhn Model for the interaural time differences in the azimuthal plane , 1977 .