Minimum technical requirements and evaluating effectiveness of teleradiology.

Teleradiology, the electronic transmission of radiological images for the purposes of interpretation and consultation, has successfully entered routine health services. It is, therefore, currently one of the single largest applications of telemedicine. This technology is predicted to play a significant role in improving service access to rural and remote areas. However, teleradiology services are currently characterized by a compromise between expense and quality of digital images. This paper reviews minimum equipment requirements and the technical issues and limits that are experienced when utilizing current teleradiological technology. Categories of service evaluation, including measures of user satisfaction, clinical outcome and financial benefit, are discussed in relation to facilitating a radiology service of the highest quality possible.

[1]  R. Wootton,et al.  What constitutes success in telehealth? , 2001, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[2]  J Reponen,et al.  The teleradiology system and changes in work practices. , 1998, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine.

[3]  Ilias Iakovidis,et al.  Improving user acceptance of health-care telematics , 2000, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[4]  P. Trott,et al.  Cost evaluation of a telepsychiatry service in northern Queensland , 1998, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[5]  M Mars,et al.  A simple telemedicine system using a digital camera , 2000, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[6]  C Ruggiero,et al.  Teleradiology: a review , 1998, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[7]  E. J. Cardno,et al.  Managing the ‘fit‘ of information and communication technology in community health: A framework for decision making , 2000, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[8]  D. Eedy,et al.  A randomized controlled trial to assess the clinical effectiveness of both realtime and store-and-forward teledermatology compared with conventional care , 2000, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[9]  D. Eedy,et al.  Patient cost–benefit analysis of teledermatology measured in a randomized control trial , 1999, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[10]  Vivian L. West,et al.  Patient Satisfaction with Telemedicine , 2000 .

[11]  D. Eedy,et al.  Patient satisfaction with realtime teledermatology in Northern Ireland , 1998, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[12]  E. Miller,et al.  Telemedicine and doctor-patient communication: an analytical survey of the literature , 2001, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[13]  R Dunn,et al.  The legal and risk management conundrum of telemedicine , 1999, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[14]  J. Mitchell,et al.  The cost-effectiveness of teleradiology at the Women's and Children's Hospital in Adelaide , 2000, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[15]  J. Grigsby,et al.  Effects and Effectiveness of Telemedicine , 1995, Health care financing review.

[16]  S Tachakra The changes patients expect to result from telemedicine , 2000, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[17]  I. Kristiansen,et al.  Radiology services for remote communities: cost minimisation study of telemedicine , 1996, BMJ.

[18]  M Frase-Blunt Telemedicine: across the miles and right next door. , 1998, Hospital topics.

[19]  J. L. Huston,et al.  Patient satisfaction with multispecialty interactive teleconsultations , 1997, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[20]  R T Higashida,et al.  New methods of treatment for cerebral aneurysms. , 1998, The Western journal of medicine.

[21]  P Jacklin,et al.  A randomized controlled trial assessing the health economics of realtime teledermatology compared with conventional care: an urban versus rural perspective , 2001, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[22]  B L Crowe Cost-effectiveness analysis of telemedicine , 1998, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[23]  R. Bashshur On the definition and evaluation of telemedicine. , 1995, Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[24]  A Sivakumar,et al.  Evaluation of telemedical support to a free-standing minor accident and treatment service , 1998, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[25]  P Whitten,et al.  Patients' perceptions of a telemedicine specialty clinic , 2000, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[26]  M Rademaker,et al.  Patient cost-benefits of realtime teledermatology-a comparison of data from Northern Ireland and New Zealand , 2000, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[27]  P. Whitten,et al.  Systematic review of studies of patient satisfaction with telemedicine , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[28]  S. Håkansson,et al.  What do we really know about the cost-effectiveness of telemedicine? , 2000, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[29]  M C Davis,et al.  Teleradiology in rural imaging centres , 1997, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[30]  M Rademaker,et al.  A cost-minimization analysis of the societal costs of realtime teledermatology compared with conventional care: results from a randomized controlled trial in New Zealand , 2001, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[31]  F S Mair,et al.  A review of telemedicine cost-effectiveness studies , 2000, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[32]  D Caramella,et al.  Teleradiology in Europe. , 2000, European journal of radiology.

[33]  J. Picot,et al.  Meeting the need for educational standards in the practice of telemedicine and telehealth , 2000, Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare.

[34]  Norris Tg Telemedicine and teleradiology. , 1999 .

[35]  Manolis Tsiknakis,et al.  Teleradiology services within the context of an integrated regional network , 2001, Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery - International Congress and Exhibition.