Collaborative writing tasks in the L2 classroom: Comparing group, pair, and individual work

Abstract This study investigates the benefits of collaborative writing tasks. Previous research from the perspective of the sociocultural theory of mind suggests that writing tasks completed in pairs offer learners an opportunity to collaborate in the solution of their language-related problems, co-construct new language knowledge, and produce linguistically more accurate written texts. Building on this research, the present study compares the performance of the same writing task by groups of four learners ( n  = 15), pairs ( n  = 15), and individual learners ( n  = 21). It examines the effect of the number of participants on the fluency, complexity, and accuracy of the written texts produced, as well as the nature of the oral interaction between the pairs and the groups as they collaborate throughout the writing process. The analysis of interaction focused on language-related episodes (LREs) reveals that although both groups and pairs focused their attention on language relatively often, groups produced more LREs and a higher percentage of correctly resolved LREs than pairs. As a result, the texts written by the groups were more accurate not only than those written individually, but also than those written in pairs. The implications of these results for the understanding of both collaborative writing tasks and collaborative problem solving activity are discussed.

[1]  M. Swain,et al.  Perception of Learner Proficiency: Its Impact on the Interaction Between an ESL Learner and Her Higher and Lower Proficiency Partners , 2008 .

[2]  Amy Snyder Ohta,et al.  Second Language Acquisition Processes in the Classroom: Learning Japanese , 2001 .

[3]  Jennifer D. Ewald.  Language-Related Episodes in an Assessment Context: A 'Small-Group Quiz' , 2005 .

[4]  David Nunan,et al.  Designing Tasks For The Communicative Classroom , 1989 .

[5]  Michael J. Leeser.  Learner proficiency and focus on form during collaborative dialogue , 2004 .

[6]  Peter Skehan,et al.  Modelling Second Language Performance: Integrating Complexity, Accuracy, Fluency, and Lexis , 2009 .

[7]  Jessica Williams.  The effectiveness of spontaneous attention to form , 2001 .

[8]  Neomy Storch,et al.  Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections , 2005 .

[9]  Neomy Storch,et al.  Metatalk in a Pair Work Activity: Level of Engagement and Implications for Language Development , 2008 .

[10]  Rod Ellis,et al.  Task-based Language Learning and Teaching , 2003 .

[11]  Neomy Storch,et al.  Using activity theory to explain differences in patterns of dyadic interactions in an ESL class , 2004 .

[12]  J. Lantolf.  Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning , 2013 .

[13]  Hossein Nassaji,et al.  Collaborative and individual output tasks and their effects on learning English phrasal verbs , 2010 .

[14]  Shigenobu Takatsuka,et al.  Text-based peer-peer collaborative dialogue in a computer-mediated learning environment in the EFL context , 2009 .

[15]  M. Swain,et al.  Interaction and Second Language Learning: Two Adolescent French Immersion Students Working Together , 1998 .

[16]  María del Pilar García Mayo,et al.  Chapter 5. Attention to Form Across Collaborative Tasks by Low-Proficiency Learners in an EFL Setting , 2006 .

[17]  Jessica Williams.  Learner-Generated Attention to Form. , 1999 .

[18]  Heidi Byrnes,et al.  Advanced language learning : the contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky , 2006 .

[19]  Carol A. Chapelle,et al.  The encyclopedia of applied linguistics , 2013 .

[20]  Neomy Storch,et al.  Are two heads better than one? Pair work and grammatical accuracy , 1999 .

[21]  L. Vygotsky.  Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[22]  Merrill Swain,et al.  Effects of proficiency differences and patterns of pair interaction on second language learning: collaborative dialogue between adult ESL learners , 2007 .

[23]  Frederick J. Dicamilla,et al.  Socio-cognitive Functions of L1 Collaborative Interaction in the L2 Classroom , 1998 .

[24]  Merrill Swain,et al.  Reformulation and the Learning of French Pronominal Verbs in a Canadian French Immersion Context. , 2002 .

[25]  L. Ortega.  Chapter 9. Studying Writing Across EFL Contexts: Looking Back and Moving Forward , 2009 .

[26]  YouJin Kim,et al.  The Contribution of Collaborative and Individual Tasks to the Acquisition of L2 Vocabulary , 2008 .

[27]  Merrill Swain,et al.  Talking It through: Two French Immersion Learners' Response to Reformulation. , 2002 .

[28]  Rod Ellis,et al.  Analysing Learner Language , 2005 .

[29]  Neomy Storch,et al.  Pair versus individual writing: Effects on fluency, complexity and accuracy , 2009 .

[30]  Neomy Storch,et al.  Investigating the merits of pair work on a text editing task in ESL classes , 2007 .

[31]  María del Pilar,et al.  Investigating tasks in formal language learning , 2007 .

[32]  Merrill Swain,et al.  Integrating Language and Content Teaching through Collaborative Tasks , 2001 .

[33]  Merrill Swain,et al.  Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects , 2001 .

[34]  Folkert Kuiken,et al.  The effect of interaction in acquiring the grammar of a second language , 2002 .

[35]  Merrill Swain,et al.  Researching Pedagogic Tasks: Second Language Learning, Teaching, and Testing , 2013 .

[36]  Neomy Storch,et al.  How collaborative is pair work? ESL tertiary students composing in pairs , 2001 .

[37]  J. Norris,et al.  Towards an Organic Approach to Investigating CAF in Instructed SLA: The Case of Complexity , 2009 .

[38]  Neomy Storch,et al.  Patterns of Interaction in ESL Pair Work , 2002 .

[39]  Merrill Swain,et al.  An interacting loop model for solar flare bursts. , 2002 .

[40]  Neomy Storch.  A classroom-based study: insights from a collaborative text reconstruction task , 1998 .

[41]  Pat Strauss,et al.  Group assessments: dilemmas facing lecturers in multicultural tertiary classrooms , 2007 .

[42]  Neomy Storch,et al.  LEARNERS’ PROCESSING, UPTAKE, AND RETENTION OF CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK ON WRITING , 2010, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[43]  YouJin Kim,et al.  The effect of interlocutor proficiency on the collaborative dialogue between Korean as a second language learners , 2008 .

[44]  YouJin Kim.  The role of task complexity and pair grouping on the occurrence of learning opportunities and L2 development , 2009 .