Linear parameter varying (LPV) based robust control of type-I diabetes driven for real patient data

A roadmap of possibilities and boundaries of H controller design for the artificial pancreas problem is presented.LPV-modeling technique is used to handle direct the nonlinear model for the H linear control method.Weighting functions selection is presented based on knowledge accumulated from real patient measurements. Due to increasing prevalence of diabetes as well as increasing management costs, the artificial control of diabetes is a highly important task. Model-based design allows finding more effective solutions for the individual treatment of diabetic patients, but robustness is an important property that can be hardly guaranteed by the already developed individualized control algorithms. Modern robust control (known as H) theory represents an efficient possibility to solve robustness requirements in a general way based on exact mathematical formulation (Linear Matrix Inequalities) combined with knowledge-based expertise (through real patient data, uncertainty weighting functions can be formulated). When the difference between the nominal model and real patient dynamics is bounded and known, this approach becomes highly reliable. However, this requirement poses the greatest limitation since a model always represents an approximation of the complex physiological process. Consequently, the uncertainty formulation of the neglected dynamics becomes crucial as robust methods are very sensitive to them. In order to formulate them, large amount of real patient data and medical expertise is needed to cover the different life-style scenarios (especially the worst-case ones) that define the control space by the accumulated knowledge. On the other hand, Hbased methods represent linear control techniques; hence their direct nonlinear application is important for a physiological process. The paper presents a roadmap of using modern robust control in diabetes focusing on nonlinear model-based interpretation: how the weighting functions should be selected based on (knowledge-based) medical expertise, the direct nonlinear applicability of the method taking additional advantage of the recently emerged Linear Parameter Varying (LPV) methodology, robust performance investigation and switching control possibilities. During the control characteristics discussion, the trade-off between the medical knowledge-based empiricism and exact control engineering formulation is introduced through different examples computed under MATLAB on real diabetic patient data.

[1]  Roman Hovorka,et al.  Simulation Environment to Evaluate Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery Systems in Type 1 Diabetes , 2010, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[2]  Giuseppe De Nicolao,et al.  Model predictive control of glucose concentration in type I diabetic patients: An in silico trial , 2009, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[3]  L. Magni,et al.  Evaluating the Efficacy of Closed-Loop Glucose Regulation via Control-Variability Grid Analysis , 2008, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[4]  Nikita Tomin,et al.  Random Forest Based Model for Preventing Large-Scale Emergencies in Power Systems , 2015 .

[5]  U. Rajendra Acharya,et al.  Computer-aided diagnosis of diabetic subjects by heart rate variability signals using discrete wavelet transform method , 2015, Knowl. Based Syst..

[6]  Eyal Dassau,et al.  Periodic-Zone Model Predictive Control for Diurnal Closed-Loop Operation of an Artificial Pancreas , 2013, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[7]  F. Doyle,et al.  Quest for the Artificial Pancreas: Combining Technology with Treatment , 2010, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[8]  Levente Kovács,et al.  LPV-based quality interpretations on modeling and control of diabetes , 2016 .

[9]  R. Bergman,et al.  Physiologic evaluation of factors controlling glucose tolerance in man: measurement of insulin sensitivity and beta-cell glucose sensitivity from the response to intravenous glucose. , 1981, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[10]  Levente Kovács,et al.  Preliminary model-free results of a Hungarian robust artificial pancreas algorithm , 2013 .

[11]  Levente Kovács,et al.  Linear Matrix Inequality-based Robust Controller design for Type-1 Diabetes Model , 2014 .

[12]  Özlem Türkşen,et al.  An Application of Nelder-Mead Heuristic-based Hybrid Algorithms: Estimation of Compartment Model Parameters , 2016 .

[13]  S. Wild,et al.  Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. , 2004, Diabetes care.

[14]  Levente Kovács,et al.  Induced L2-norm minimization of glucose-insulin system for Type I diabetic patients , 2011, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[15]  U. Rajendra Acharya,et al.  Automated characterization and classification of coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction by decomposition of ECG signals: A comparative study , 2017, Inf. Sci..

[16]  J. Shaw,et al.  Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 2030. , 2010, Diabetes research and clinical practice.

[17]  E. Atlas,et al.  Nocturnal glucose control with an artificial pancreas at a diabetes camp. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  Francis J. Doyle,et al.  Confidence from uncertainty - A multi-target drug screening method from robust control theory , 2010, BMC Systems Biology.

[19]  J. Doyle,et al.  Robust and optimal control , 1995, Proceedings of 35th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[20]  Malgorzata E. Wilinska,et al.  Overnight Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery in Young People With Type 1 Diabetes: A Free-Living, Randomized Clinical Trial , 2014, Diabetes Care.

[21]  Francis J. Doyle,et al.  Robust H∞ glucose control in diabetes using a physiological model , 2000 .

[22]  Viral N Shah,et al.  Closed-loop system in the management of diabetes: past, present, and future. , 2014, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[23]  Lauren M. Huyett,et al.  Closed-Loop Artificial Pancreas Systems: Engineering the Algorithms , 2014, Diabetes Care.

[24]  C. Cobelli,et al.  Artificial Pancreas: Past, Present, Future , 2011, Diabetes.

[25]  Colin N. Jones,et al.  Long horizon input parameterisations to enlarge the region of attraction of MPC , 2016 .

[26]  R. Hovorka,et al.  Nonlinear model predictive control of glucose concentration in subjects with type 1 diabetes. , 2004, Physiological measurement.

[27]  Lawton Hubert Lee,et al.  Identification and Robust Control of Linear Parameter-Varying Systems , 1997 .

[28]  A. Isidori Nonlinear Control Systems , 1985 .

[29]  Jongeun Choi,et al.  Linear Parameter-Varying Control for Engineering Applications , 2013, Springer Briefs in Electrical and Computer Engineering.

[30]  Patricio Colmegna,et al.  Analysis of three T1DM simulation models for evaluating robust closed-loop controllers , 2014, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[31]  Levente Kovács,et al.  Robust servo control of a novel type 1 diabetic model , 2011 .

[32]  Cesar C. Palerm,et al.  Physiologic insulin delivery with insulin feedback: A control systems perspective , 2011, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[33]  Claudia-Adina Dragos,et al.  Novel Tensor Product Models for Automatic Transmission System Control , 2012, IEEE Systems Journal.

[34]  Marc D. Breton,et al.  Safety of Outpatient Closed-Loop Control: First Randomized Crossover Trials of a Wearable Artificial Pancreas , 2014, Diabetes Care.

[35]  Giovanni Sparacino,et al.  An Online Failure Detection Method of the Glucose Sensor-Insulin Pump System: Improved Overnight Safety of Type-1 Diabetic Subjects , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[36]  R. De Keyser,et al.  EPSAC Predictive Control of Blood Glucose Level in Type I Diabetic Patients , 2005, Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[37]  U. Rajendra Acharya,et al.  Sudden cardiac death (SCD) prediction based on nonlinear heart rate variability features and SCD index , 2016, Appl. Soft Comput..

[38]  John Thomas Sorensen,et al.  A physiologic model of glucose metabolism in man and its use to design and assess improved insulin therapies for diabetes , 1985 .

[39]  Hervé Guéguen,et al.  A Robust Receding Horizon Control Approach to Artificial Glucose Control for Type 1 Diabetes , 2013, NOLCOS.

[40]  Levente Kovács,et al.  Long-term prediction for T1DM model during state-feedback control , 2016, 2016 12th IEEE International Conference on Control and Automation (ICCA).

[41]  M. Morari,et al.  Closed-Loop Control of Blood Glucose , 2007 .

[42]  Eyal Dassau,et al.  Reducing Glucose Variability Due to Meals and Postprandial Exercise in T1DM Using Switched LPV Control , 2016, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[43]  Robin De Keyser,et al.  Impact of disturbance filter in nonlinear EPSAC predictive control of blood glucose level in type I diabetic patients , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications.

[44]  Patricio Colmegna,et al.  Reducing Risks in Type 1 Diabetes Using ${\cal H}_\infty$ Control , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.