5G Centralized Multi-Cell Scheduling for URLLC: Algorithms and System-Level Performance

We study centralized radio access network (C-RAN) with multi-cell scheduling algorithms to overcome the challenges for supporting ultra-reliable low-latency communications (URLLC) in the fifth-generation new radio (5G NR) networks. Low-complexity multi-cell scheduling algorithms are proposed for enhancing the URLLC performance. In comparison with the conventional distributed scheduling, we show that the C-RAN architecture can significantly reduce undesirable queuing delay of URLLC traffic. The gain of user scheduling with different metrics and the benefit of packet segmentation are analyzed. The performance of the proposed solutions is evaluated with an advanced 5G NR compliant system-level simulator with high degree of realism. The results show that the centralized multi-cell scheduling achieves up to 60% latency improvement over the traditional distributed scheduling while fulfilling the challenging reliability of URLLC. It is shown that segmentation brings additional performance gain for both centralized and distributed scheduling. The results also highlight the significant impact of channel- and delay-aware scheduling of URLLC payloads.

[1]  Klaus I. Pedersen,et al.  Agile 5G Scheduler for Improved E2E Performance and Flexibility for Different Network Implementations , 2018, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[2]  Klaus I. Pedersen,et al.  System Level Analysis of Dynamic User-Centric Scheduling for a Flexible 5G Design , 2016, 2016 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM).

[3]  Gilberto Berardinelli,et al.  Achieving Ultra-Reliable Low-Latency Communications: Challenges and Envisioned System Enhancements , 2018, IEEE Network.

[4]  Thomas Pfeiffer,et al.  Next generation mobile fronthaul and midhaul architectures [Invited] , 2015, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.

[5]  Gerhard Fettweis,et al.  Diversity Trade-Offs and Joint Coding Schemes for Highly Reliable Wireless Transmissions , 2016, 2016 IEEE 84th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC-Fall).

[6]  Wanshi Chen,et al.  5G ultra-reliable and low-latency systems design , 2017, 2017 European Conference on Networks and Communications (EuCNC).

[7]  Tiankui Zhang,et al.  Opportunistic User Association for Multi-Service HetNets Using Nash Bargaining Solution , 2014, IEEE Communications Letters.

[8]  Rajeev Agrawal,et al.  Dynamic point selection for LTE-advanced: Algorithms and performance , 2014, 2014 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC).

[9]  Stefan Parkvall,et al.  5G wireless access: requirements and realization , 2014, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[10]  Klaus I. Pedersen,et al.  Opportunistic Spatial Preemptive Scheduling for URLLC and eMBB Coexistence in Multi-User 5G Networks , 2018, IEEE Access.

[11]  Klaus I. Pedersen,et al.  Joint Link Adaptation and Scheduling for 5G Ultra-Reliable Low-Latency Communications , 2018, IEEE Access.

[12]  Preben E. Mogensen,et al.  On the benefits of early HARQ feedback with non-ideal prediction in 5G networks , 2016, 2016 International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems (ISWCS).

[13]  Neelesh B. Mehta,et al.  An Accurate Model for EESM and its Application to Analysis of CQI Feedback Schemes and Scheduling in LTE , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[14]  Prathima Agrawal,et al.  Approximation Algorithms for Cell Association and Scheduling in Femtocell Networks , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing.

[15]  Erik G. Ström,et al.  Wireless Access for Ultra-Reliable Low-Latency Communication: Principles and Building Blocks , 2018, IEEE Network.

[16]  Zexian Li,et al.  Link adaptation design for ultra-reliable communications , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[17]  Robert Schober,et al.  User Association in 5G Networks: A Survey and an Outlook , 2015, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[18]  Nurul H. Mahmood,et al.  Centralized Joint Cell Selection and Scheduling for Improved URLLC Performance , 2018, 2018 IEEE 29th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC).

[19]  Gilberto Berardinelli,et al.  Rethink Hybrid Automatic Repeat reQuest Design for 5G: Five Configurable Enhancements , 2017, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[20]  Mehdi Bennis,et al.  Ultra-Reliable and Low-Latency Vehicular Transmission: An Extreme Value Theory Approach , 2018, IEEE Communications Letters.

[21]  David Chase,et al.  Code Combining - A Maximum-Likelihood Decoding Approach for Combining an Arbitrary Number of Noisy Packets , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[22]  Wenbo Wang,et al.  Distributed Resource Scheduling Based on Potential Game in Dense Cellular Network , 2018, IEEE Access.

[23]  Preben E. Mogensen,et al.  Improving Dense Network Performance Through Centralized Scheduling and Interference Coordination , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[24]  Catherine Rosenberg,et al.  Resource Allocation, Transmission Coordination and User Association in Heterogeneous Networks: A Flow-Based Unified Approach , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[25]  Matthew Andrews,et al.  Providing quality of service over a shared wireless link , 2001, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[26]  Evgeny M. Khorov,et al.  Radio resource and traffic management for ultra-reliable low latency communications , 2018, 2018 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC).

[27]  David López-Pérez,et al.  Resource Scheduling for Mixed Traffic Types with Scalable TTI in Dynamic TDD Systems , 2016, 2016 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps).

[28]  Preben E. Mogensen,et al.  MAC layer enhancements for ultra-reliable low-latency communications in cellular networks , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops).