A Convolutional Autoencoder for Multi-Subject fMRI Data Aggregation

Finding the most effective way to aggregate multi-subject fMRI data is a long-standing and challenging problem. It is of increasing interest in contemporary fMRI studies of human cognition due to the scarcity of data per subject and the variability of brain anatomy and functional response across subjects. Recent work on latent factor models shows promising results in this task but this approach does not preserve spatial locality in the brain. We examine two ways to combine the ideas of a factor model and a searchlight based analysis to aggregate multi-subject fMRI data while preserving spatial locality. We first do this directly by combining a recent factor method known as a shared response model with searchlight analysis. Then we design a multi-view convolutional autoencoder for the same task. Both approaches preserve spatial locality and have competitive or better performance compared with standard searchlight analysis and the shared response model applied across the whole brain. We also report a system design to handle the computational challenge of training the convolutional autoencoder.

[1]  C. Honey,et al.  Hierarchical process memory: memory as an integral component of information processing , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Deep learning for neuroimaging: a validation study , 2013, Front. Neurosci..

[3]  Andrew R. Barron,et al.  Universal approximation bounds for superpositions of a sigmoidal function , 1993, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[4]  Te-Won Lee,et al.  Independent vector analysis (IVA): Multivariate approach for fMRI group study , 2008, NeuroImage.

[5]  Tülay Adali,et al.  Comparison of multi‐subject ICA methods for analysis of fMRI data , 2010, Human brain mapping.

[6]  A. Dale,et al.  High‐resolution intersubject averaging and a coordinate system for the cortical surface , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[7]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Searchlight analysis: Promise, pitfalls, and potential , 2013, NeuroImage.

[8]  Jeff A. Bilmes,et al.  Deep Canonical Correlation Analysis , 2013, ICML.

[9]  Forrest N. Iandola,et al.  FireCaffe: Near-Linear Acceleration of Deep Neural Network Training on Compute Clusters , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[10]  J. S. Guntupalli,et al.  A Model of Representational Spaces in Human Cortex , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[11]  Charles R. Johnson,et al.  Matrix analysis , 1985, Statistical Inference for Engineers and Data Scientists.

[12]  J. Pekar,et al.  A method for making group inferences from functional MRI data using independent component analysis , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[13]  John Salvatier,et al.  Theano: A Python framework for fast computation of mathematical expressions , 2016, ArXiv.

[14]  I. Johnsrude,et al.  The problem of functional localization in the human brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[15]  Samy Bengio,et al.  Revisiting Distributed Synchronous SGD , 2016, ArXiv.

[16]  M. Torrens Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[17]  Seungjin Choi,et al.  Independent Component Analysis , 2009, Handbook of Natural Computing.

[18]  Justin L. Vincent,et al.  Precuneus shares intrinsic functional architecture in humans and monkeys , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Danilo Bzdok,et al.  Semi-Supervised Factored Logistic Regression for High-Dimensional Neuroimaging Data , 2015, NIPS.

[20]  Kenneth A. Norman,et al.  Shared experience, shared memory: a common structure for brain activity during naturalistic recall , 2016, bioRxiv.

[21]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Joint Blind Source Separation by Multiset Canonical Correlation Analysis , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[22]  Orhan Firat,et al.  Learning Deep Temporal Representations for Brain Decoding , 2014, ArXiv.

[23]  Nitish Srivastava,et al.  Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting , 2014, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[24]  Po-Hsuan Chen,et al.  A Reduced-Dimension fMRI Shared Response Model , 2015, NIPS.

[25]  Jeff A. Bilmes,et al.  On Deep Multi-View Representation Learning , 2015, ICML.

[26]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  The functional architecture of the ventral temporal cortex and its role in categorization , 2014, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[27]  Shin Ishii,et al.  Deep learning of fMRI big data: a novel approach to subject-transfer decoding , 2015, ArXiv.

[28]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Information-based functional brain mapping. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  Bryan R. Conroy,et al.  A Common, High-Dimensional Model of the Representational Space in Human Ventral Temporal Cortex , 2011, Neuron.

[30]  Snigdhansu Chatterjee,et al.  Procrustes Problems , 2005, Technometrics.

[31]  John C. Mazziotta,et al.  A Probabilistic Atlas and Reference System for the Human Brain , 2001 .

[32]  Bryan R. Conroy,et al.  Function-based Intersubject Alignment of Human Cortical Anatomy , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[33]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Preserving subject variability in group fMRI analysis: performance evaluation of GICA vs. IVA , 2014, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[34]  Peter J. Ramadge,et al.  fMRI-Based Inter-Subject Cortical Alignment Using Functional Connectivity , 2009, NIPS.

[35]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators , 1989, Neural Networks.

[36]  Peter J. Ramadge,et al.  Inter-subject alignment of human cortical anatomy using functional connectivity , 2013, NeuroImage.