The Fabric of Digital Life: Uncovering Sociotechnical Tradeoffs in Embodied Computing Through Metadata

Purpose This paper aims to examine how metadata taxonomies in embodied computing databases indicate context (e.g. a marketing context or an ethical context) and describe ways to track the evolution of the embodied computing industry over time through digital media archiving. Design/methodology/approach The authors compare the metadata taxonomies of two embodied computing databases by providing a narrative of their top-level categories. After identifying these categories, they describe how they structure the databases around specific themes. Findings The growing wearables market often hides complex sociotechnical tradeoffs. Marketing products like Vandrico Inc.’s Wearables Database frame wearables as business solutions without conveying information about the various concessions users make (about giving up their data, for example). Potential solutions to this problem include enhancing embodied computing literacy through the construction of databases that track media about embodied computing technologies using customized metadata categories. Databases such as FABRIC contain multimedia related to the emerging embodied computing market – including patents, interviews, promotional videos and news articles – and can be archived through user-curated collections and tagged according to specific themes (privacy, policing, labor, etc.). One of the benefits of this approach is that users can use the rich metadata fields to search for terms and create curated collections that focus on tradeoffs related to embodied computing technologies. Originality/value This paper describes the importance of metadata for framing the orientation of embodied computing databases and describes one of the first attempts to comprehensively track the evolution of embodied computing technologies, their developers and their diverse applications in various social contexts through media archiving.

[1]  Ari Saarinen,et al.  Compliance and technical feasibility of long-term health monitoring with wearable and ambient technologies , 2009, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[2]  Oana Mitrea,et al.  SUSTAINABILITY ICT VISIONS AND THEIR EMBEDDING IN TECHNOLOGY CONSTRUCTION , 2010 .

[3]  Matthias Bärwolff,et al.  Discrimination, liberty, and innovation: some thoughts on the invariable trade-offs of normative purposes and technical means in the internet , 2009, ReArch '09.

[4]  Alison Bowes,et al.  ETHICAL IMPLICATIONS OF LIFESTYLE MONITORING DATA IN AGEING RESEARCH , 2012 .

[5]  Gina Neff,et al.  Self-Tracking , 2016 .

[6]  Sundaresan Jayaraman,et al.  e-Health and quality of life: the role of the Wearable Motherboard. , 2004, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[7]  Tiziana Terranova.  Free Labor: Producing Culture for the Digital Economy , 2000 .

[8]  Victor W. Pickard.  Cooptation and cooperation: institutional exemplars of democratic internet technology , 2008, New Media Soc..

[9]  Knut H. Sørensen,et al.  Tacit Networks, Heterogeneous Engineers, and Embodied Technology , 1992 .

[10]  Zdravko Radman,et al.  Knowing without thinking : mind, action, cognition, and the phenomenon of the background , 2012 .

[11]  George Ritzer,et al.  Prosumer Capitalism , 2015 .

[12]  E. Cobley.  Modernism and the Culture of Efficiency: Ideology and Fiction , 2009 .

[13]  G. Riva.  From virtual to real body: Virtual reality as embodied technology , 2008 .

[14]  Kirsty Best,et al.  INVALID COMMAND , 2009 .

[15]  James N. Gilmore,et al.  Everywear: The quantified self and wearable fitness technologies , 2016, New Media Soc..

[16]  Frederick Winslow Taylor,et al.  科学管理原理=The principles of scientific management , 2014 .

[17]  Megan L. Ranney,et al.  The Virtual Toxicology Service: Wearable Head-Mounted Devices for Medical Toxicology , 2014, Journal of Medical Toxicology.

[18]  D. Zwick,et al.  Putting Consumers to Work , 2008 .

[19]  Robert Rosenberger,et al.  Embodied technology and the dangers of using the phone while driving , 2012 .

[20]  Keun Lee,et al.  Embodied technology transfer and learning by exporting in the Ethiopian manufacturing sector , 2016, Firm-Level Innovation in Africa.

[21]  Kirsten L. Ellison,et al.  Hiding in plain sight: The rhetoric of bionic contact lenses in mainstream discourses , 2017 .

[22]  Karen Yeung,et al.  ‘Hypernudge’: Big Data as a mode of regulation by design , 2016, The Social Power of Algorithms.

[23]  M. Castells.  Communication Power: Mass Communication, Mass Self-Communication and Power Relationships in the Network Society , 2009, Media and Society.

[24]  Chris Esposito.  Wearable computers: Field-test observations and system design guidelines , 2005, Personal Technologies.

[25]  Joanna Berzowska,et al.  Electronic Textiles: Wearable Computers, Reactive Fashion, and Soft Computation , 2005 .

[26]  Mark Andrejevic,et al.  iSpy: Surveillance and Power in the Interactive Era , 2007 .

[27]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Privacy and human behavior in the age of information , 2015, Science.

[28]  Xin Liu,et al.  Wearability Factors for Skin Interfaces , 2016, AH.

[29]  Melanie Grunwald,et al.  Convergence Culture Where Old And New Media Collide , 2016 .

[30]  Christopher M. Schlick,et al.  Development and validation of a technology acceptance model for safety-enhancing, wearable locating systems , 2016, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[31]  G. J. Smith.  Surveillance, Data and Embodiment , 2016 .

[32]  Andrew Bucksbarg,et al.  Improvising Artists, Embodied Technology and Emergent Techniques , 2012 .

[33]  A. Zwitter.  Big Data ethics , 2014, Big Data Soc..

[34]  Georgios Kambourakis,et al.  Editorial: Developments in Security and Privacy-Preserving Mechanisms for Future Mobile Communication Networks , 2014, Mob. Networks Appl..

[35]  M. Albrecht.  Review: Andrejevic, Mark. (2007). iSpy: Surveillance and Power in the Interactive Era. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas , 2008 .

[36]  Kenneth R. Fleischmann,et al.  The Evolution of Agency: Spectra of Bioagency and Cyberagency , 2007, Inf. Soc..

[37]  Susan Kozel,et al.  Closer: Performance, Technologies, Phenomenology , 2007 .

[38]  Yong Chen,et al.  An emerging technology – wearable wireless sensor networks with applications in human health condition monitoring , 2015 .

[39]  Isabel Pedersen,et al.  A semiotics of human actions for wearable augmented reality interfaces , 2005 .

[40]  Mark S. Ackerman,et al.  Privacy in pervasive environments: next generation labeling protocols , 2004, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[41]  Fatemeh Zahedi,et al.  Trust-Discount Tradeoff in Three Contexts: Frugality Moderating Privacy and Security Concerns , 2014, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[42]  Annie I. Antón,et al.  Balancing Good Intentions : Protecting the Privacy of Electronic Health Information , 2010 .

[43]  S. Gallagher.  Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences , 2018 .

[44]  Greg Elmer,et al.  Profiling Machines: Mapping the Personal Information Economy , 2003 .

[45]  Susan Elizabeth Ryan,et al.  Garments of Paradise: Wearable Discourse in the Digital Age , 2014 .

[46]  Tero Karppi,et al.  Our metrics, ourselves: A hundred years of self-tracking from the weight scale to the wrist wearable device , 2015 .

[47]  Carl Lagoze,et al.  Big Data, data integrity, and the fracturing of the control zone , 2014, Big Data Soc..

[48]  H. Hashizume,et al.  Questions to Improve Quality of Life with Wearables: Humans, Technology, and the World , 2006, 2006 International Conference on Hybrid Information Technology.

[49]  Clare Birchall.  Shareveillance: Subjectivity between open and closed data , 2016, Big Data Soc..

[50]  Federica Russo,et al.  Critical data studies: An introduction , 2016, Big Data Soc..

[51]  Ian Watson.  The Odin actor: embodied technology, memory, and the corporeal archive , 2013 .

[52]  Andrés Lucero,et al.  Embodied Technology: Unraveling Bodily Action with Normative Types , 2015, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[53]  Dawei Liu,et al.  Can trust and social benefit really help? Empirical examination of purchase intentions for wearable devices , 2017 .

[54]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Where the action is , 2001 .

[55]  Luciano Floridi,et al.  What is the Philosophy of Information , 2002 .

[56]  Ingunn Moser,et al.  Disability and the promises of technology: Technology, subjectivity and embodiment within an order of the normal , 2006 .

[57]  Eugene C. Freuder,et al.  Constraint-based reasoning and privacy/efficiency tradeoffs in multi-agent problem solving , 2005, Artif. Intell..

[58]  Danielle Arigo,et al.  Promoting physical activity among women using wearable technology and online social connectivity: a feasibility study , 2015 .

[59]  B. Wessels.  Exploring human agency and digital systems , 2013 .

[60]  Embodied Technology as Implicit Background of Modern Civilization , 2012 .

[61]  José van Dijck,et al.  Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content , 2009 .

[62]  Karen E. C. Levy,et al.  The Contexts of Control: Information, Power, and Truck-Driving Work , 2015, Inf. Soc..

[63]  D. Nafus.  Quantified: Biosensing Technologies in Everyday Life , 2016 .

[64]  S. Lam Po Tang,et al.  Recent developments in flexible wearable electronics for monitoring applications , 2007 .

[65]  A. Canhoto,et al.  Exploring the factors that support adoption and sustained use of health and fitness wearables , 2017 .

[66]  Melanie Feinberg,et al.  Compiler to author: A process for designing rhetorically aware document collections , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[67]  Isabel Pedersen,et al.  MyLifeBits, augmented memory, and a rhetoric of need , 2008 .

[68]  G. Ritzer,et al.  Production, Consumption, Prosumption , 2010 .

[69]  A. Clark,et al.  The Extended Mind , 1998, Analysis.

[70]  Sang-Lin Han,et al.  Effects of technology readiness on prosumer attitude and eWOM , 2013 .

[71]  Suk Bong Choi,et al.  Social multimedia network service quality, user satisfaction, and prosumer activity , 2017, Multimedia Tools and Applications.

[72]  Craig M Dalton,et al.  Critical Data Studies: A dialog on data and space , 2016 .

[73]  Thierry Rayna,et al.  Involving Consumers: The Role of Digital Technologies in Promoting ‘Prosumption’ and User Innovation , 2016 .

[74]  Ben O'Loughlin,et al.  The Political Implications Of Digital Innovations: Trade-offs of democracy and liberty in the developed world , 2001 .

[75]  Robin Wright,et al.  Wearable Technology: If the Tech Fits, Wear It , 2014 .

[76]  Woodrow Barfield,et al.  Fundamentals of Wearable Computers and Augumented Reality , 2000 .

[77]  Jennifer Pybus.  SOCIAL NETWORKS AND CULTURAL WORKERS , 2013 .

[78]  Elizabeth Connor.  Wearable Technology: Smart Watches to Google Glass for Libraries , 2016 .

[79]  Gordon Bell,et al.  Your Life, Uploaded: The Digital Way to Better Memory, Health, and Productivity , 2010 .

[80]  Sundaresan Jayaraman,et al.  The wearables revolution and Big Data: the textile lineage , 2017 .

[81]  Catherine Gouge,et al.  Wearables, Wearing, and the Rhetorics that Attend to Them , 2016 .