Recent advances in mechanics of fracking and new results on 2 D simulation of crack branching in anisotropic gas or oil shale This paper is dedicated to the memory of

This article presents a comprehensive overview of several recent theoretical results at Northwestern University and demonstrates them by new numerical simulations of branching of hydraulic fractures. Tomodel the inelastic behavior and fracturing of shale as an inherently anisotropic material, the recently developed spherocylindrical microplane model is described. Regarding the spread and branching of hydraulic cracks during the fracking process, it is emphasized that two kinds of water flow must be simulated: (1) the Poiseuille flow through the hydraulic fractures and natural cracks and (2) the Darcy diffusion flow of leak-off water through the pores of intact shale. The body forces due to gradient of Darcy flow pressure must be taken into account. The crack opening width is computed by means of the crack band model, in which each finite element is imagined to contain at the outset a potential cohesive crack, one in each of three spatial orientations, with the fracking water flowing through if the crack gets opened. The use of this model to suppress problems of mesh sensitivity due to localization of distributed fracturing is explained. Computer simulations of the growth of branched hydraulic system are preformed in two dimensions (2D) only. The results illustrate the effects of anisotropy and natural cracks on the evolution of 2D fracture patterns during the fracking process. These effects are not large, but much stronger effects are expected in future three-dimensional simulations.

[1]  Y. Abousleiman,et al.  Nanomechanical Characterization of the Tensile Modulus of Rupture for Kerogen-Rich Shale , 2017 .

[2]  Z. Bažant,et al.  Spherocylindrical microplane constitutive model for shale and other anisotropic rocks , 2017 .

[3]  Z. Bažant,et al.  The Enigma of Large-Scale Permeability of Gas Shale: Pre-Existing or Frac-Induced? , 2017 .

[4]  C. Arson,et al.  Discrete equivalent wing crack based damage model for brittle solids , 2017 .

[5]  J. Heath,et al.  Shales at all scales: Exploring coupled processes in mudrocks , 2017 .

[6]  C. Arson,et al.  Computational model coupling mode II discrete fracture propagation with continuum damage zone evolution , 2017 .

[7]  Yewang Su,et al.  Growth model for large branched three-dimensional hydraulic crack system in gas or oil shale , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[8]  M. Zoback,et al.  A Comparison of Short-Term and Long-Term Creep Experiments in Unconventional Reservoir Formations , 2016 .

[9]  Z. Bažant,et al.  Microplane-Triad Model for Elastic and Fracturing Behavior of Woven Composites , 2016 .

[10]  HanYi Wang Poro-elasto-plastic modeling of complex hydraulic fracture propagation: simultaneous multi-fracturing and producing well interference , 2016 .

[11]  Heping Xie,et al.  Novel idea of the theory and application of 3D volume fracturing for stimulation of shale gas reservoirs , 2016 .

[12]  Youn-Kyou Lee,et al.  Tensile failure criterion for transversely isotropic rocks , 2015 .

[13]  Brice Lecampion,et al.  Simultaneous initiation and growth of multiple radial hydraulic fractures from a horizontal wellbore , 2015 .

[14]  S. Levasseur,et al.  A microcracks-induced damage model for initially anisotropic rocks accounting for microcracks closure , 2015 .

[15]  J. Daemen,et al.  Experimental and theoretical study of the anisotropic properties of shale , 2015 .

[16]  Jincai Zhang,et al.  Measurement and Analysis of 3D Stress Shadowing Related to the Spacing of Hydraulic Fracturing in Unconventional Reservoirs , 2014 .

[17]  Zdeněk P. Bažant,et al.  Why Fracking Works , 2014 .

[18]  M. Sibai,et al.  Experimental investigation of the effect of temperature on the mechanical behavior of Tournemire shale , 2014 .

[19]  M. Mokhtari,et al.  Tensile Failure of Shales: Impacts of Layering and Natural Fractures , 2014 .

[20]  Ferhun C. Caner,et al.  Microplane model M7 for plain concrete. I: Formulation , 2013 .

[21]  N. B. Nagel,et al.  Coupled Numerical Evaluations of the Geomechanical Interactions Between a Hydraulic Fracture Stimulation and a Natural Fracture System in Shale Formations , 2013, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.

[22]  H. Sone Mechanical properties of shale gas reservoir rocks, and itsrelation to the in-situ stress variation observed in shale gasreservoirs , 2012 .

[23]  George J. Moridis,et al.  A Numerical Study of Microscale Flow Behavior in Tight Gas and Shale Gas Reservoir Systems , 2011 .

[24]  Ferhun C. Caner,et al.  Multiscale simulation of fracture of braided composites via repetitive unit cells , 2011 .

[25]  Doug Bentley,et al.  The Effect of Mechanical Properties Anisotropy in the Generation of Hydraulic Fractures in Organic Shales , 2011 .

[26]  Robin Beckwith,et al.  Hydraulic Fracturing: The Fuss, The Facts, The Future , 2010 .

[27]  Z. Bažant,et al.  Spectral Stiffness Microplane Model for Quasibrittle Composite Laminates—Part I: Theory , 2008 .

[28]  Emmanuel M Detournay,et al.  Toughness-dominated Hydraulic Fracture with Leak-off , 2005 .

[29]  Jan Cervenka,et al.  Equivalent localization element for crack band approach to mesh‐sensitivity in microplane model , 2005 .

[30]  Emmanuel M Detournay,et al.  Propagation Regimes of Fluid-Driven Fractures in Impermeable Rocks , 2004 .

[31]  Isaac M Daniel,et al.  Microplane model for stiff foams and finite element analysis of sandwich failure by core indentation , 2001 .

[32]  Emmanuel M Detournay,et al.  The Tip Region of a Fluid-Driven Fracture in an Elastic Medium , 2000 .

[33]  J. P. Henry,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF SOME FAILURE CRITERIA FOR STRONGLY ANISOTROPIC GEOMATERIALS , 1998 .

[34]  Z. Bažant,et al.  Fracture and Size Effect in Concrete and Other Quasibrittle Materials , 1997 .

[35]  J. P. Henry,et al.  Laboratory investigation of the mechanical behaviour of Tournemire shale , 1997 .

[36]  Pere C. Prat,et al.  Microplane Model for Concrete. I: Stress-Strain Boundaries and Finite Strain , 1996 .

[37]  Zdenek P. Bazant,et al.  Microplane Model for Concrete , 1996 .

[38]  Thandavarayan Ramamurthy,et al.  A Strength Criterion for Anisotropic Rocks , 1988 .

[39]  P. Bazant,et al.  Efficient Numerical Integration on the Surface of a Sphere , 1986 .

[40]  K. Ravi-Chandar,et al.  An experimental investigation into dynamic fracture: III. On steady-state crack propagation and crack branching , 1984 .

[41]  Evert Hoek,et al.  Strength of jointed rock masses , 1983 .

[42]  Z. Bažant Comment on Orthotropic Models for Concrete and Geomaterials , 1983 .

[43]  Z. Bažant,et al.  Crack band theory for fracture of concrete , 1983 .

[44]  Zdenek P. Bazant,et al.  CRACK BAND MODEL FOR FRACTURE OF GEOMATERIALS. , 1982 .

[45]  E. M. Wu,et al.  A General Theory of Strength for Anisotropic Materials , 1971 .

[46]  J. C. Jaeger Shear Failure of Anistropic Rocks , 1960, Geological Magazine.

[47]  I. N. Sneddon The distribution of stress in the neighbourhood of a crack in an elastic solid , 1946, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.