Stimulating RD the effect of government intervention on the development of strip casting technology

Abstract Strip casting technology in steel-making is known as an innovative energy-efficient technology. Stimulating the development (R&D) of such industrial process technologies is an appealing government intervention strategy for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. In this article, we analyse (a) the R&D trajectory of strip casting technology and (b) the effect of government intervention on the development of this particular energy-efficient technology. For this purpose we made a detailed investigation of the networks within which the technology was developed. The huge capital cost advantages of strip casting technology were already notified back in the 19th century. However, only after 1975 a robust technology network emerged. There is no single, simple determinant explaining the slow emergence of the technology network: the innovative technology had to become a more incremental improvement to the conventional production facilities before R&D was seriously pursued. Once the technology network emerged, it proved to have a strong momentum of itself. Steel firms maintained their confidence in the strategic cost advantages of the technology and persistently invested in up-scaling the technology. The effect of government intervention was minimal, because the technology network had its own strong momentum. All in all, R&D was only loosely influenced by energy-efficiency considerations or by government intervention. The major policy lesson is that information on technology networks and its momentum—in addition to classic information on energy-efficiency improvements and investments costs—is required to improve the effect of government intervention in the field of industrial energy-efficiency R&D and innovation.

[1]  L. Vrieling "The Pathfinder". Strategy paths and resources in their territory through time. , 1998 .

[2]  Pierre H. Dauby,et al.  Near net shape casting , 1987 .

[3]  Martijn G. Rietbergen,et al.  Do agreements enhance energy efficiency improvement , 2002 .

[4]  Y. K. Shin,et al.  Development of twin roll strip caster for sheet steels , 1995 .

[5]  J. C. Van Den Berg The forces that drive research and development in the steel industry , 1996 .

[6]  Esther Elisabeth Maria Luiten,et al.  Beyond energy efficiency : actors, networks and government intervention in the development of industrial process technologies , 2001 .

[7]  Zong-ci Zhao,et al.  Climate change 2001, the scientific basis, chap. 8: model evaluation. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change IPCC , 2001 .

[8]  A. L. Robson,et al.  Direct casting of thin strip , 1995 .

[9]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  Potentials and policy implications of energy and material efficiency improvement , 1997 .

[10]  J. D. Beer FUTURE TECHNOLOGIES FOR ENERGY-EFFICIENT IRON AND STEEL MAKING , 1998 .

[11]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  Emerging energy-efficient industrial technologies , 2000 .

[12]  The Sources of Invention. , 1958 .

[13]  Martijn G. Rietbergen,et al.  The effectiveness of policy instruments for energy efficiency improvements in firms , 2004 .

[14]  Jean-Pierre Birat Direct casting of thin strip steel , 1992 .

[15]  J. P. Birat Innovation in steel continuous casting : past, present and future , 1999 .