Optimum Design of Shell Structures with Stiffening Beams

The optimum design of stiffened shell structures is investigated using a robust and efficient optimization algorithm where the total weight of the structure is to be minimized subject to behavioral constraints imposed by structural design codes. Evolutionary algorithms and more specifically the evolution strategies (ES) method specially tailored for this type of problems is implemented for the solution of the structural optimization problem. The discretization of the stiffened shell is performed by means of cost-effective and reliable shell and beam elements that incorporate the natural mode concept. Three types of design variables are considered: sizing, shape, and topology. A benchmark test example is examined where the efficiency and robustness of ES over other optimization methods is investigated. Two case studies of stiffened shells are subsequently presented, where a parametric study is undertaken to obtain the most efficient design compatible with the regulations suggested by design codes such as Eurocode. The important role of the stiffeners and how they can be optimally chosen to improve the performance of shell structures in terms of carrying capacity and economy is demonstrated.

[1]  Thomas Bäck,et al.  Genetic Algorithms and Evolution Strategies - Similarities and Differences , 1990, PPSN.

[2]  J. Argyris,et al.  The TRIC shell element: theoretical and numerical investigation , 2000 .

[3]  M. Lillico,et al.  Experiments on interactive buckling in optimized stiffened panels , 2001 .

[4]  Manolis Papadrakakis,et al.  STRUCTURAL SHAPE OPTIMIZATION USING EVOLUTION STRATEGIES , 1999 .

[5]  S. Simion,et al.  MEMS optimization using genetic algorithms , 2004, 2004 International Semiconductor Conference. CAS 2004 Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8748).

[6]  John Argyris,et al.  BEC: A 2-node fast converging shear-deformable isotropic and composite beam element based on 6 rigid-body and 6 straining modes , 1998 .

[7]  D. W. Scharpf,et al.  Finite element method — the natural approach , 1979 .

[8]  M. Papadrakakis,et al.  Structural optimization using evolutionary algorithms , 2002 .

[9]  E. Hinton,et al.  Optimization of trusses using genetic algorithms for discrete and continuous variables , 1999 .

[10]  J. Farkas,et al.  Optimum design of welded stiffened plates loaded by hydrostatic normal pressure , 2000 .

[11]  K. Magnucki,et al.  Optimal design of a horizontal circular tank with ellipsoidal heads , 1998 .

[12]  Manoj Kumar.  OPTIMIZATION USING GENETIC ALGORITHMS , 1998 .

[13]  Manolis Papadrakakis,et al.  Advances in structural optimization , 1994 .

[14]  Andrew Burton.  Truss Optimization Using Genetic Algorithms , 2004 .

[15]  A. Houston,et al.  Genetic algorithms and evolution. , 1990, Journal of theoretical biology.

[16]  E. Ramm,et al.  Adaptive topology optimization , 1995 .

[17]  J. Argyris,et al.  TRIC: a simple but sophisticated 3-node triangular element based on 6 rigid-body and 12 straining modes for fast computational simulations of arbitrary isotropic and laminated composite shells , 1997 .

[18]  E. Hinton,et al.  Shell topology optimization using the layered artificial material model , 2000 .

[19]  M. Galante,et al.  GENETIC ALGORITHMS AS AN APPROACH TO OPTIMIZE REAL‐WORLD TRUSSES , 1996 .

[20]  Ernest Hinton,et al.  A COMBINED STRUCTURAL TOPOLOGY AND SIZING OPTIMIZATION PROCEDURE FOR OPTIMUM PLATES DESIGN , 2000 .

[21]  Y. J. Cao,et al.  Evolutionary programming , 1997, Proceedings of 1997 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation (ICEC '97).

[22]  Silvana M. B. Afonso,et al.  Structural optimization strategies for simple and integrally stiffened plates and shells , 2005 .

[23]  S. Rajeev,et al.  Discrete Optimization of Structures Using Genetic Algorithms , 1992 .

[24]  Marko Kegl,et al.  Shape optimization of truss-stiffened shell structures with variable thickness , 2006 .

[25]  Manolis Papadrakakis,et al.  Postbuckling performance of the TRIC natural mode triangular element for Isotropic and laminated composite shells , 1998 .

[26]  Massimo Ruzzene,et al.  Optimal design of underwater stiffened shells , 2002 .

[27]  Manolis Papadrakakis,et al.  Multi-database exploration of large design spaces in the framework of cascade evolutionary structural sizing optimization , 2005 .

[28]  D. E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search , 1989 .

[29]  Kurt Maute,et al.  Adaptive topology optimization of shell structures , 1996 .

[30]  Thomas Bäck,et al.  An Overview of Evolutionary Algorithms for Parameter Optimization , 1993, Evolutionary Computation.