Spatial, temporal and relational patterns in respondent-driven sampling: evidence from a social network study of rural drug users

Background Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) has become a common tool for recruiting high-risk populations for HIV research. However, few studies have explored the influence of geospatial proximity and relationship-level characteristics on RDS recruitment, particularly among high-risk individuals residing in rural areas of the US. Methods In a social network study of 503 drug users in rural Central Appalachia, interviewer-administered questionnaires were used to collect relationship-level data (eg, duration of relationship, frequency of communication, kinship, social/financial support, trust, drug use and sex) and residential location. Demographic and drug-use similarity were also evaluated. Residential data were geocoded and road distance (km) between participants and (1) their network members and (2) the study site were computed. Seasonal patterns were assessed using node-level analysis, and dyadic analyses were conducted using generalised linear mixed models. Adjusted ORs (AORs) and 95% CIs are reported. Results Differences in distance to the study office by season and order of study entry were not observed (F=1.49, p=0.209 and β=0.074, p=0.050, respectively). Participants with transportation lived significantly further from the interview site than their counterparts (p<0.001). Dyadic analyses revealed no association between RDS recruitment likelihood and geographic proximity. However, kinship (AOR 1.62; CI 1.02 to 2.58) and frequency of communication (AOR 1.63; CI 1.25 to 2.13) were significantly associated with RDS recruitment. Conclusions In this sample, recruitment from one's network was likely non-random, contradicting a core RDS assumption. These data underscore the importance of formative research to elucidate potential recruitment preferences and of quantifying recruitment preferences for use in analysis.

[1]  Andrew J Copas,et al.  Evaluation of Respondent-driven Sampling , 2012, Epidemiology.

[2]  L. Resick,et al.  Health beliefs, health care, and rural Appalachian subcultures from an ethnographic perspective , 1990 .

[3]  Douglas D. Heckathorn,et al.  Effectiveness of Respondent-Driven Sampling for Recruiting Drug Users in New York City: Findings from a Pilot Study , 2006, Journal of Urban Health.

[4]  Rebeca Ramos,et al.  Respondent-Driven Sampling of Injection Drug Users in Two U.S.–Mexico Border Cities: Recruitment Dynamics and Impact on Estimates of HIV and Syphilis Prevalence , 2006, Journal of Urban Health.

[5]  Holly Hagan,et al.  Evaluating respondent-driven sampling in a major metropolitan area: Comparing injection drug users in the 2005 Seattle area national HIV behavioral surveillance system survey with participants in the RAVEN and Kiwi studies. , 2010, Annals of epidemiology.

[6]  Douglas D. Heckathorn,et al.  From Networks to Populations: The Development and Application of Respondent-Driven Sampling Among IDUs and Latino Gay Men , 2005, AIDS and Behavior.

[7]  Robert G Carlson,et al.  Respondent-driven sampling in the recruitment of illicit stimulant drug users in a rural setting: findings and technical issues. , 2007, Addictive behaviors.

[8]  C. Latkin,et al.  Subpopulations of illicit drug users reached by targeted street outreach and respondent-driven sampling strategies: implications for research and public health practice. , 2011, Annals of epidemiology.

[9]  Matthew J. Salganik,et al.  Assessing respondent-driven sampling , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  W. Mcfarland,et al.  Comparing Respondent-Driven Sampling and Targeted Sampling Methods of Recruiting Injection Drug Users in San Francisco , 2010, Journal of Urban Health.

[11]  Patrick S Sullivan,et al.  Behavioral Surveillance among People at Risk for HIV Infection in the U.S.: The National HIV Behavioral Surveillance System , 2007, Public health reports.

[12]  Douglas D. Heckathorn,et al.  Respondent-driven sampling II: deriving valid population estimates from chain-referral samples of hi , 2002 .

[13]  L. Helton,et al.  Culturally Competent Approaches for Counseling Urban Appalachian Clients: An Exploratory Case Study , 2010 .

[14]  J. Havens,et al.  Network Structure and the Risk for HIV Transmission Among Rural Drug Users , 2013, AIDS and Behavior.

[15]  Ann M Jolly,et al.  Understanding recruitment: outcomes associated with alternate methods for seed selection in respondent driven sampling , 2013, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[16]  D. Heckathorn,et al.  Extensions of Respondent-Driven Sampling: A New Approach to the Study of Injection Drug Users Aged 18–25 , 2002, AIDS and Behavior.

[17]  Francisco I Bastos,et al.  Putting Respondent-Driven Sampling on the Map: Insights from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil , 2011, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[18]  April M Young,et al.  OxyContin® as currency: OxyContin® use and increased social capital among rural Appalachian drug users. , 2012, Social science & medicine.

[19]  Robert G Carlson,et al.  Respondent-driven sampling to recruit MDMA users: a methodological assessment. , 2005, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[20]  T. Ha,et al.  Assessment of Random Recruitment Assumption in Respondent-Driven Sampling in Egocentric Network Data. , 2012, Social networking.

[21]  J. Havens,et al.  Individual and network factors associated with prevalent hepatitis C infection among rural Appalachian injection drug users. , 2013, American journal of public health.

[22]  Richard G. White,et al.  Evaluation of the role of location and distance in recruitment in respondent-driven sampling , 2011, International journal of health geographics.

[23]  H. Hagan,et al.  Spatial Recruitment Bias in Respondent-Driven Sampling: Implications for HIV Prevalence Estimation in Urban Heterosexuals , 2014, AIDS and Behavior.

[24]  Bruce Ergood,et al.  Appalachia Social Context: Past and Present , 1993 .

[25]  Mohsen Malekinejad,et al.  Using Respondent-Driven Sampling Methodology for HIV Biological and Behavioral Surveillance in International Settings: A Systematic Review , 2008, AIDS and Behavior.

[26]  R. Hanneman.  Introduction to Social Network Methods , 2001 .

[27]  A. Lansky,et al.  Developing an HIV Behavioral Surveillance System for Injecting Drug Users: The National HIV Behavioral Surveillance System , 2007, Public health reports.

[28]  R. Rothenberg,et al.  Sociometric risk networks and risk for HIV infection. , 1997, American journal of public health.

[29]  Cyprian Wejnert,et al.  3. An Empirical Test of Respondent-Driven Sampling: Point Estimates, Variance, Degree Measures, and Out-of-Equilibrium Data , 2009, Sociological methodology.

[30]  Douglas D. Heckathorn,et al.  Respondent-driven sampling : A new approach to the study of hidden populations , 1997 .

[31]  David Krackhardt,et al.  PREDICTING WITH NETWORKS: NONPARAMETRIC MULTIPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS OF DYADIC DATA * , 1988 .

[32]  Matthew J. Salganik.  Variance Estimation, Design Effects, and Sample Size Calculations for Respondent-Driven Sampling , 2006, Journal of Urban Health.

[33]  Xin Lu.  Respondent-Driven Sampling : Theory, Limitations & Improvements , 2013 .

[34]  Abby E. Rudolph,et al.  The Importance of Measuring and Accounting for Potential Biases in Respondent-Driven Samples , 2013, AIDS and Behavior.

[35]  E. Caine,et al.  Respondent-driven sampling to recruit in-country migrant workers in China: A methodological assessment , 2012, Scandinavian journal of public health.

[36]  Tobi Saidel,et al.  Review of sampling hard-to-reach and hidden populations for HIV surveillance. , 2005, AIDS.