Activity classification in users of ankle foot orthoses.

A framework for activity classification using inertial sensors mounted on ankle foot orthoses (AFOs) is presented. A decision tree-nearest neighbor algorithm classifies activities using subject-specific training. Eight volunteer subjects wore modified bilateral AFOs with shank and foot mounted triaxial accelerometers and gyroscopes. The AFOs were fitted with hardware to induce different gait perturbations: free rotation of the ankle, plantarflexion or "equinus" gait, and locked ankle joint. For each condition, the subject performed eight gait activities at varied slopes and standing, sitting, and lying postures. Using video for ground truth, the algorithm had an overall mean sensitivity of 95% using 50% of the data (≈ 140 s) for training and demonstrated upwards of 90% sensitivity with 25% of the data (≈ 70 s) for training. High sensitivities (≥ 87%) and PPV (≥ 90%) were achieved for all annotated gait patterns for all perturbations, excluding stair climbing (63%, 77%) and descending (80%, 78%). Postures were classified with less sensitivity and PPV than gait activities: lying (98%, 93%), standing (80%, 84%) and sitting (64%, 75%). Non-annotated walking (68%) and standing (73%) were classified with less sensitivity than were corresponding annotated events. Our results indicate that AFOs are a suitable sensor platform for future research in activity classification and gait monitoring in AFO users with perturbed gait using limited training data.

[1]  Hailong Zhu,et al.  Support vector machine for classification of walking conditions using miniature kinematic sensors , 2008, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[2]  B. G. Celler,et al.  Classification of basic daily movements using a triaxial accelerometer , 2004, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[3]  Taeyoung Kim,et al.  Characterising and minimising sources of error in inertial body sensor networks , 2013, Int. J. Auton. Adapt. Commun. Syst..

[4]  J. Bussmann,et al.  Ambulatory accelerometry to quantify motor behaviour in patients after failed back surgery: a validation study , 1998, Pain.

[5]  Friedrich Foerster,et al.  Detection of posture and motion by accelerometry : a validation study in ambulatory monitoring , 1999 .

[6]  N Susan Stott,et al.  The sensitivity and specificity of an activity monitor in detecting functional activities in young people with cerebral palsy. , 2009, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  Shanshan Chen,et al.  Extracting Spatio-Temporal Information from Inertial Body Sensor Networks for Gait Speed Estimation , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Body Sensor Networks.

[8]  Center of mass motion and the effects of ankle bracing on metabolic cost during submaximal walking trials , 2006, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[9]  Johannes Peltola,et al.  Activity classification using realistic data from wearable sensors , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[10]  Kenneth Meijer,et al.  Activity identification using body-mounted sensors—a review of classification techniques , 2009, Physiological measurement.

[11]  Gaetano Borriello,et al.  A Practical Approach to Recognizing Physical Activities , 2006, Pervasive.

[12]  Kamiar Aminian,et al.  Stair climbing detection during daily physical activity using a miniature gyroscope. , 2005, Gait & posture.

[13]  Xiao-Jun Zeng,et al.  An Instance-Based Algorithm With Auxiliary Similarity Information for the Estimation of Gait Kinematics From Wearable Sensors , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[14]  J Y Goulermas,et al.  Regression techniques for the prediction of lower limb kinematics. , 2005, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[15]  S. Walt,et al.  Reliability and validity of an activity monitor (IDEEA) in the determination of temporal-spatial gait parameters in individuals with cerebral palsy. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[16]  Ilkka Korhonen,et al.  Detection of Daily Activities and Sports With Wearable Sensors in Controlled and Uncontrolled Conditions , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[17]  Nigel H. Lovell,et al.  Implementation of a real-time human movement classifier using a triaxial accelerometer for ambulatory monitoring , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[18]  Bernt Schiele,et al.  Towards Less Supervision in Activity Recognition from Wearable Sensors , 2006, 2006 10th IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers.

[19]  P. Veltink,et al.  Validity and reliability of measurements obtained with an "activity monitor" in people with and without a transtibial amputation. , 1998, Physical therapy.

[20]  K Aminian,et al.  Ambulatory system for the quantitative and qualitative analysis of gait and posture in chronic pain patients treated with spinal cord stimulation. , 2004, Gait & posture.

[21]  Eliathamby Ambikairajah,et al.  Classification of a known sequence of motions and postures from accelerometry data using adapted Gaussian mixture models. , 2006, Physiological measurement.

[22]  Ling Bao,et al.  Activity Recognition from User-Annotated Acceleration Data , 2004, Pervasive.

[23]  P H Veltink,et al.  Detection of static and dynamic activities using uniaxial accelerometers. , 1996, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[24]  Paul Lukowicz,et al.  Performance Metrics and Evaluation Issues for Continuous Activity Recognition , 2006 .

[25]  Kent Larson,et al.  Activity Recognition in the Home Using Simple and Ubiquitous Sensors , 2004, Pervasive.

[26]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  A Hybrid Discriminative/Generative Approach for Modeling Human Activities , 2005, IJCAI.

[27]  Kamiar Aminian,et al.  Ambulatory system for human motion analysis using a kinematic sensor: monitoring of daily physical activity in the elderly , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[28]  Anthony Rowe,et al.  Location and Activity Recognition Using eWatch: A Wearable Sensor Platform , 2006, Ambient Intelligence in Everyday.