Encoding under trust and distrust: the spontaneous activation of incongruent cognitions.

Past studies of strategic thinking have shown that the encoding of the message information becomes more complex under distrust. Receivers process the information as if they are trying to protect themselves from being misled by testing alternative potential interpretations. The present study investigates the possibility that when people are mistrustful they spontaneously activate associations that are incongruent with the given message. Findings from 3 experiments suggest that, even when the distrust is unrelated in any meaningful way to the message and even when receivers are unable to prepare a strategic response, the cognitive system reacts to distrust by automatically inducing the consideration of incongruent associations--it seems designed to ask, "and what if the information were false?" The theoretical implications of the results for theories of social perception and persuasion are discussed.

[1]  E. Burnstein,et al.  “I am not guilty” vs “I am innocent”: Successful negation may depend on the schema used for its encoding☆ , 2004 .

[2]  Robert L. Mason,et al.  Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 2003 .

[3]  R. Feldman,et al.  Self-Presentation and Verbal Deception: Do Self-Presenters Lie More? , 2002 .

[4]  K. Mcgraw,et al.  The Pandering Politicians of Suspicious Minds , 2002, The Journal of Politics.

[5]  The influence of postreliance detection on the deceptive efficacy of dishonest signals of intent: Understanding facial clues to deceit as the outcome of signaling tradeoffs , 2002 .

[6]  M. Bacharach,et al.  Trust in signs. , 2001 .

[7]  David M. Messick,et al.  Trust as a form of shallow morality. , 2001 .

[8]  R. Hardin,et al.  Conceptions and explanations of trust. , 2001 .

[9]  J. Forgas.  Handbook of Affect and Social Cognition , 2001 .

[10]  K. Cook.  Trust in Society , 2001 .

[11]  Klaus Fiedler,et al.  Affective Influences on Social Information Processing , 2000 .

[12]  Adam D. Galinsky,et al.  Counterfactuals as behavioral primes: Priming the simulation heuristic and consideration of alternatives. , 2000 .

[13]  Ran R. Hassin,et al.  Facing faces: studies on the cognitive aspects of physiognomy. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  B. Depaulo,et al.  Beliefs About Cues to Deception: Mindless Stereotypes or Untapped Wisdom? , 1999 .

[15]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Trust and distrust in organizations: emerging perspectives, enduring questions. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[16]  Jonathan M. Golding,et al.  Intentional forgetting: Interdisciplinary approaches. , 1998 .

[17]  R. Lewicki,et al.  Trust And Distrust: New Relationships and Realities , 1998 .

[18]  B. Depaulo,et al.  Everyday lies in close and casual relationships. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  D. Wegner,et al.  Control and automaticity in social life. , 1998 .

[20]  S. Fein,et al.  Can the Jury Disregard that Information? The Use of Suspicion to Reduce the Prejudicial Effects of Pretrial Publicity and Inadmissible Testimony , 1997 .

[21]  James J. Lindsay,et al.  The Accuracy-Confidence Correlation in the Detection of Deception , 1997, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[22]  Jo Liska.  Cognitive ethology: The minds of other animals , 1997 .

[23]  Gerard J. Tellis,et al.  Advertising and sales promotion strategy , 1997 .

[24]  N. Roese.  Counterfactual thinking. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[25]  Ray Bull,et al.  Lay Persons' and Police Officers' Beliefs Regarding Deceptive Behaviour , 1996 .

[26]  S. Fein.  Effects of suspicion on attributional thinking and the correspondence bias , 1996 .

[27]  Yaacov Schul,et al.  Dealing with Deceptions that are Difficult to Detect: Encoding and Judgment as a Function of Preparing to Receive Invalid Information , 1996 .

[28]  B. Depaulo,et al.  Lying in everyday life. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[29]  D. Funder.  On the accuracy of personality judgment: a realistic approach. , 1995, Psychological review.

[30]  P. Kollock.  The Emergence of Exchange Structures: An Experimental Study of Uncertainty, Commitment, and Trust , 1994, American Journal of Sociology.

[31]  D. Berry,et al.  Accuracy in Face Perception: A View from Ecological Psychology , 1993 .

[32]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Suspicion and Dispositional Inference , 1993 .

[33]  Amos Tversky,et al.  Implicit Quantification of Personality Traits , 1993 .

[34]  Romin W. Tafarodi,et al.  You can't not believe everything you read. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[35]  Yaacov Schul,et al.  When warning succeeds: The effect of warning on success in ignoring invalid information. , 1993 .

[36]  L. Cosmides,et al.  The Adapted mind : evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture , 1992 .

[37]  L. Cosmides,et al.  Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. , 1992 .

[38]  P. Ekman,et al.  Who can catch a liar? , 1991, The American psychologist.

[39]  Pawel Lewicki,et al.  The role of learned inferential encoding rules in the perception of faces: Effects of nonconscious self-perpetuation of a bias , 1990 .

[40]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Suspicion of ulterior motivation and the correspondence bias. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[41]  J. Burgoon,et al.  Nonverbal Communication , 2018, Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science.

[42]  L. Newman,et al.  Spontaneous trait inference. , 1989 .

[43]  A. Kruglanski.  Lay epistemics and human knowledge , 1989 .

[44]  D. Gilbert,et al.  On cognitive busyness: When person perceivers meet persons perceived. , 1988 .

[45]  Seymour Sudman,et al.  THE PEOPLE AND THE PRESS , 1987 .

[46]  Y. Trope.  Identification and Inferential Processes in Dispositional Attribution. , 1986 .

[47]  D. Berry,et al.  Perceiving character in faces: the impact of age-related craniofacial changes on social perception. , 1986, Psychological bulletin.

[48]  Malcolm R. Parks,et al.  Deception Detection and Relationship Development: The Other Side of Trust , 1986 .

[49]  D. Wegner,et al.  The Transparency of Denial: Briefing in the Debriefing Paradigm , 1985 .

[50]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  The freezing and unfreezing of lay-inferences: Effects on impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping, and numerical anchoring ☆ , 1983 .

[51]  Daniel M. Wegner,et al.  Incrimination through innuendo: Can media questions become public answers? , 1981 .

[52]  Mark Snyder,et al.  Behavioral confirmation in social interaction: From social perception to social reality. , 1978 .

[53]  Robert F. Dyer,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of Corrective Advertising , 1978 .

[54]  J. H. Neely.  Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. , 1977 .

[55]  Robert S. Baron,et al.  Distraction Can Enhance or Reduce Yielding to Propaganda: Thought Disruption Versus Effort Justification , 1976 .

[56]  J. H. Neely.  Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Evidence for facilitatory and inhibitory processes , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[57]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Psychology of Reasoning: Structure and Content , 1972 .

[58]  J. Grier,et al.  Nonparametric indexes for sensitivity and bias: computing formulas. , 1971, Psychological bulletin.

[59]  L. Festinger,et al.  ON RESISTANCE TO PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATIONS. , 1964, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[60]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[61]  J. L. Gould,et al.  The Animal Mind , 1931, Nature.