Speaking and Writing in the University: A Multidimensional Comparison

The dozens of studies on academic discourse carried out over the past 20 years have mostly focused on written academic prose (usually the technical research article in science or medicine) or on academic lectures. Other registers that may be more important for students adjusting to university life, such as textbooks, have received surprisingly little attention, and spoken registers such as study groups or on-campus service encounters have been virtually ignored. To explain more fully the nature of the tasks that incoming international students encounter, this article undertakes a comprehensive linguistic description of the range of spoken and written registers at U.S. universities. Specifically, the article describes a multidimensional analysis of register variation in the TOEFL 2000 Spoken and Written Academic Language Corpus. The analysis shows that spoken registers are fundamentally different from written ones in university contexts, regardless of purpose. Some of the register characterizations are particularly surprising. For example, classroom teaching was similar to the conversational registers in many respects, and departmental brochures and Web pages were as informationally dense as textbooks. The article discusses the implications of these findings for pedagogy and future research.

[1]  J. A. Edwards,et al.  Talking data : transcription and coding in discourse research , 1995 .

[2]  G. Thompson,et al.  Evaluation in the Reporting Verbs Used in Academic Papers. , 1991 .

[3]  Chih-Hua Kuo,et al.  The Use of Personal Pronouns: Role Relationships in Scientific Journal Articles. , 1999 .

[4]  Carol Berkenkotter,et al.  Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication , 1994 .

[5]  Ian A. Williams A contextual study of lexical verbs in two types of medical research report: Clinical and experimental , 1996 .

[6]  Maria José Luzon Marco,et al.  Collocational frameworks in medical research papers: a genre-based study , 2000 .

[7]  John Flowerdew,et al.  Academic Listening: Research Perspectives , 1995 .

[8]  HighWire Press Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London , 1781, The London Medical Journal.

[9]  Susan Conrad,et al.  Will Corpus Linguistics Revolutionize Grammar Teaching in the 21st Century , 2000 .

[10]  James R. Nattinger,et al.  Lexical Phrases and Language Teaching , 1992 .

[11]  Alison M. Love LEXICO-GRAMMATICAL FEATURES OF GEOLOGY TEXTBOOKS: PROCESS AND PRODUCT REVISITED , 1993 .

[12]  Dwight Atkinson,et al.  The Evolution of Medical Research Writing from 1735 to 1985: The Case of the "Edinburgh Medical Journal.". , 1992 .

[13]  J. Richards,et al.  The Effect of Discourse Markers on the Comprehension of Lectures. , 1986 .

[14]  Sandra U. Gibson,et al.  Literacy demands of the undergraduate curriculum , 1992 .

[15]  Barbara Strodt-López Tying it all in: Asides in university lectures , 1991 .

[16]  Gibson Ferguson,et al.  If you pop over there: a corpus-based study of conditionals in medical discourse , 2001 .

[17]  C. Bazerman Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science , 1989 .

[18]  Dwight Atkinson,et al.  The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675–1975: A sociohistorical discourse analysis , 1996, Language in Society.

[19]  Leonard S. Cahen,et al.  Educational Testing Service , 1970 .

[20]  Susan Conrad Investigating academic texts with corpus-based techniques: An example from biology☆ , 1996 .

[21]  Susan Conrad,et al.  Variation in English: Multi-Dimensional Studies , 2001 .

[22]  Greg Myers,et al.  The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles , 1989 .

[23]  J. Swales,et al.  Consider this: The role of imperatives in scholarly writing , 1998 .

[24]  K. Hyland,et al.  Talking to the Academy , 1996 .

[25]  John M. Swales,et al.  Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings , 1993 .

[26]  Courtney B. Cazden,et al.  Classroom Discourse: The Language of Teaching and Learning. Second Edition. , 2001 .

[27]  Douglas Biber,et al.  Dimensions of Register Variation: A Cross-Linguistic Comparison , 1995 .

[28]  Krista Varantola,et al.  On noun phrase structures in engineering English , 1984 .

[29]  Michael Halliday,et al.  On the language of physical science , 2003 .

[30]  Douglas Biber,et al.  WHAT DOES FREQUENCY HAVE TO DO WITH GRAMMAR TEACHING , 2002 .

[31]  Douglas Biber,et al.  Variation across speech and writing: Methodology , 1988 .

[32]  Jeannett Martin,et al.  Writing Science: Literacy And Discursive Power , 1993 .

[33]  Françoise Salager-Meyer,et al.  Referential Behavior in Scientific Writing: aDiachronic Study (1810–1995) , 1999 .

[34]  K. Hyland,et al.  Hedging in academic writing and EAF textbooks , 1994 .

[35]  K. Hyland,et al.  Writing Without Conviction? Hedging in Science Research Articles , 1996 .

[36]  D. Atkinson Scientific discourse in sociohistorical context: The philosophical transactions of the Royal Society , 1998 .

[37]  Susan Conrad,et al.  Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use , 1998 .

[38]  Joan E. Cutting The grammar of the in-group code , 1999 .

[39]  Peter Crompton,et al.  Hedging in academic writing: Some theoretical problems , 1997 .

[40]  M. Mulkay,et al.  Opening Pandora's Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientists' Discourse , 1984 .

[41]  John Flowerdew,et al.  The Effect of Discourse Markers on Second Language Lecture Comprehension , 1995, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[42]  Janet Holmes,et al.  Doubt and Certainty in ESL Textbooks , 1988 .

[43]  Abdullah A. Khuwaileh The role of chunks, phrases and body language in understanding co-ordinated academic lectures , 1999 .

[44]  D. Biber,et al.  Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English , 1999 .

[45]  S. Hunston A corpus study of some English verbs of attribution , 1995 .

[46]  Joy M. Reid,et al.  Grammar in the composition classroom , 1998 .

[47]  Susan Conrad,et al.  The importance of corpus-based research for language teachers , 1999 .