A multi-dimensional decision framework for modular value transfer activity

This paper explores the key dimensions and value-adding elements of a supply chain delivering cockpit modules to an automotive assembly operation in the United Kingdom. The findings demonstrate that supplying on a modular basis is influenced by the initial design decisions of the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM), the capabilities of the Module supplier and the ability to offer greater levels of customisation in a high-volume environment. The research articulates the findings through the concept of the ‘Dimensions of Modularity’ which seeks to demonstrate the key decision areas in a modular context and extend the concept of ‘Value Transfer Activity’ within a modular context. Our research provides insights into the specific dynamics of a module supply chain from OEM through to Modular supplier and a supplier of sub-modules. From this research, those involved in developing modular solutions can determine the multi-dimensional issues that need to be addressed to ensure that the supply chain is effectively connected and value transfer implications are accommodated and maximised. By adopting a single supply chain approach to exploring the impact of modular practices this paper provides valuable observations into an area of supply chain and operations management that is becoming increasingly relevant to both academic and practitioner communities.

[1]  Peter Fredriksson,et al.  Operations and logistics issues in modular assembly processes: cases from the automotive sector , 2006 .

[2]  R. V. Hoek,et al.  The Impact of Modular Production on the Dynamics of Supply Chains , 1998 .

[3]  John K. Gershenson,et al.  Modular Product Design: A Life-Cycle View , 1999, Trans. SDPS.

[4]  Federico Caniato,et al.  The moderating effect of product complexity on new product development and supply chain management integration , 2015 .

[5]  W. Stiles Quality control in qualitative research , 1993 .

[6]  Desmond Doran,et al.  Supply chain modularisation: cases from the French automobile industry , 2007 .

[7]  Fabrizio Salvador,et al.  Modularity, product variety, production volume and component sourcing: Theorizing beyond generic prescriptions , 2002 .

[8]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Understanding the Elusive Black Box of Dynamic Capabilities , 2011, Decis. Sci..

[9]  C. Cassell,et al.  Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research , 2004 .

[10]  Jan Olhager,et al.  Product architecture and supply chain design: a systematic review and research agenda , 2015 .

[11]  Desmond Doran,et al.  Supply chain implications of modularization , 2003 .

[12]  Ricardo Ernst,et al.  Evaluation of supply chain structures through modularization and postponement , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[14]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Sourcing By Design: Product Complexity and the Supply Chain , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[15]  N. Beech Liminality and the practices of identity reconstruction , 2011 .

[16]  Ahm Shamsuzzoha,et al.  Development of sustainable platform for modular product family: a case study , 2017 .

[17]  Pablo Cabanelas,et al.  The impact of modular platforms on automobile manufacturing networks , 2017 .

[18]  Glen M. Schmidt,et al.  Analyzing Product Architecture Under Technological Change: Modular Upgradeability Tradeoffs , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[19]  Fabrizio Salvador,et al.  Supply-chain configurations for mass customization , 2004 .

[20]  Desmond Doran,et al.  Rethinking the supply chain: an automotive perspective , 2004 .

[21]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[22]  Yong Yin,et al.  Product architecture, product development process, system integrator and product global performance , 2014 .

[23]  Glen M. Schmidt,et al.  Matching Product Architecture and Supply Chain Configuration , 2010 .

[24]  John Paul MacDuffie,et al.  Modularity‐as‐Property, Modularization‐as‐Process, and ‘Modularity'‐as‐Frame: Lessons from Product Architecture Initiatives in the Global Automotive Industry , 2013 .

[25]  J. Hsuan Impacts of supplier–buyer relationships on modularization in new product development , 1999 .

[26]  Anu Bask,et al.  The concept of modularity: diffusion from manufacturing to service production , 2010 .

[27]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[28]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[29]  Juliana Hsuan Mikkola,et al.  Supply-chain integration: implications for mass customization, modularization and postponement strategies , 2004 .

[30]  Leslie Monplaisir,et al.  Matching product architecture with supply chain design , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[31]  Brian Squire,et al.  Modularization and the impact on supply relationships , 2007 .