How Much Is Enough? Examining the Public's Beliefs About Consumption

Relatively little public opinion research has explored beliefs about consumption. This lack of research is surprising given the increasing attention paid by many commentators to the relationship between consumption and ecological sustainability. Reporting on data collected from a series of five statewide surveys of Oregonians conducted between 2008 and 2009, we find that a strong majority (74–88%) of the Oregon public supports reducing consumption and believes doing so would improve societal and individual well-being. These findings appear to challenge conventional wisdom about our collective and never-ending need for consumption of material goods. Our results reveal broad agreement on the consumption issue across traditional ideological divides. We also conducted in-depth qualitative interviews, which allowed us to explore what “consumption” means to Oregonians and why people think our country would be better off if we reduced consumption. Our findings suggest that populist attitudes toward reducing consumption may fill a role that policymakers avoid for a variety of reasons. We discuss the relevance of consumption beliefs to public policy aimed at reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, as well as directions for future research.

[1]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Energy requirements of households in Brazil , 2005 .

[2]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  Kenneth H. Beck Scale development and validation in health education research , 1989 .

[4]  J. Martínez-Alier,et al.  Crisis or opportunity? Economic degrowth for social equity and ecological sustainability. Introduction to this special issue , 2010 .

[5]  Arnold Tukker,et al.  Sustainable Consumption and Production , 2010 .

[6]  Matthew C. Nisbet,et al.  Communicating Climate Change: Why Frames Matter for Public Engagement , 2009 .

[7]  M. Svoboda Why We Disagree about Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity , 2011 .

[8]  Marsha L. Richins The Material Values Scale: Measurement Properties and Development of a Short Form , 2004 .

[9]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Environmentally Efficient Well-Being: Rethinking Sustainability as the Relationship between Human Well-being and Environmental Impacts , 2008 .

[10]  D. Uzzell,et al.  An examination of the values that motivate socially conscious and frugal consumer behaviours , 2009 .

[11]  Anthony Leiserowitz,et al.  Climate Change in the American Mind: Americans' Climate Change Beliefs, Attitudes, Policy Preferences, and Actions , 2009 .

[12]  T. Princen Consumption and its Externalities: Where Economy Meets Ecology , 2001, Global Environmental Politics.

[13]  Klaus Hubacek,et al.  The Impact of Social Factors and Consumer Behavior on Carbon Dioxide Emissions in the United Kingdom , 2010 .

[14]  Marsha L. Richins,et al.  A Consumer Values Orientation for Materialism and Its Measurement: Scale Development and Validation , 1992 .

[15]  Dan Dolderman,et al.  Personality predictors of Consumerism and Environmentalism: A preliminary study , 2007 .

[16]  W. Adger,et al.  Defining and Experiencing Dangerous Climate Change , 2004 .

[17]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  Impacts of Household Consumption and Export Trade on CO 2 Emissions , 2011 .

[18]  S. Gosling,et al.  A Theory of the Emergence, Persistence, and Expression of Geographic Variation in Psychological Characteristics , 2008, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[19]  Jesper Munksgaard,et al.  Impact of household consumption on CO2 emissions , 2000 .

[20]  C. K. Mertz,et al.  Culture and Identity-Protective Cognition: Explaining the White Male Effect in Risk Perception , 2007 .

[21]  D. Shaw,et al.  Voluntary simplicity: an exploration of market interactions , 2009 .

[22]  Hal Turton,et al.  Determinants of emissions growth in OECD countries , 2002 .

[23]  E. Elliott Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technical and Environmental Dangers , 1983 .

[24]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Driving the human ecological footprint , 2007, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment.

[25]  Bastien Girod,et al.  More or Better? A Model for Changes in Household Greenhouse Gas Emissions due to Higher Income , 2010 .

[26]  R. Hueting Why environmental sustainability can most probably not be attained with growing production , 2010 .

[27]  R. Dunlap,et al.  A Widening Gap: Republican and Democratic Views on Climate Change , 2008 .

[28]  A. Abdel-Khalek Measuring happiness with a single-item scale , 2006 .

[29]  Mary E. Huneke The face of the un-consumer: An empirical examination of the practice of voluntary simplicity in the United States , 2005 .

[30]  Lewis R Goldberg,et al.  Profiling the "pro-environmental individual": a personality perspective. , 2012, Journal of personality.

[31]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Environmentally efficient weil-being: Rethinking sustainability as the relationship between human well-being and environmental impacts , 2009 .

[32]  I. Welsh,et al.  Eco-politics beyond the paradigm of sustainability: A conceptual framework and research agenda , 2007 .

[33]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[34]  R. Inglehart Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society , 1991 .

[35]  Jonathan M. Gilligan,et al.  The behavioural wedge , 2010 .

[36]  Elizabeth Shove,et al.  Inconspicuous consumption: the sociology of consumption, lifestyles and the environment , 1998 .

[37]  David S. Yeager,et al.  Measuring Americans' Issue Priorities A New Version of the Most Important Problem Question Reveals More Concern About Global Warming and the Environment , 2011 .

[38]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. , 1977 .