Role of local fields and defects in the nonlinear response of metal nanostructures

We show that local fields associated both with overall structural features and with unintended defects can be important in the second-order nonlinear response of metal nanostructures. We first consider noncentrosymmetric T-shaped gold nanodimers with nanogaps of varying size. The reflection symmetry of the T-shape is broken by a small slant in the mutual orientations of the horizontal and vertical bars, which makes the sample chiral and gives rise to a different nonlinear response for left- and right-hand circularly-polarized fundamental light. Measurements of achiral and chiral second-harmonic signals as well as the circular-difference response exhibit a nontrivial dependence on the gap size. All results are explained by considering the distribution of the resonant fundamental field in the structure and its interaction with the surface nonlinearity of the metal. We also prepared arrays of ideally centrosymmetric circular nanodots. Second- and third-harmonic generation microscopies at normal incidence were used to address polarization-dependent responses of individual dots. Both signals exhibit large differences between individual dots. This is expected for second-harmonic generation, which must arise from symmetry-breaking defects. However, similar results for third-harmonic generation suggest that both nonlinear responses are dominated by strongly localized fields at defects.

[1]  D. Bergman,et al.  Self-similar chain of metal nanospheres as efficient nanolens , 2003, InternationalQuantum Electronics Conference, 2004. (IQEC)..

[2]  S Enoch,et al.  Strong modification of the nonlinear optical response of metallic subwavelength hole arrays. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[3]  Jari Turunen,et al.  Multipole interference in the second-harmonic optical radiation from gold nanoparticles. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[4]  Brian K. Canfield,et al.  Inhomogeneities in the nonlinear tensorial responses of arrays of gold nanodots , 2008 .

[5]  O. Martin,et al.  Resonant Optical Antennas , 2005, Science.

[6]  Lukas Novotny,et al.  Optical frequency mixing at coupled gold nanoparticles. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[7]  Yaochun Shen,et al.  SURFACE-ENHANCED SECOND-HARMONIC GENERATION AND RAMAN SCATTERING , 1983 .

[8]  R. Dasari,et al.  Single Molecule Detection Using Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering (SERS) , 1997 .

[9]  Jonas Beermann,et al.  Direct observation of localized second-harmonic enhancement in random metal nanostructures. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[10]  K. Jefimovs,et al.  Remarkable polarization sensitivity of gold nanoparticle arrays , 2005 .

[11]  K. Jefimovs,et al.  A macroscopic formalism to describe the second-order nonlinear optical response of nanostructures , 2006 .

[12]  W. Steen Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles , 1999 .

[13]  Konstantins Jefimovs,et al.  Chirality arising from small defects in gold nanoparticle arrays. , 2006, Optics express.

[14]  Geraldine L. Richmond,et al.  Examination of the surface second harmonic response from noble metal surfaces at infrared wavelengths , 1993 .

[15]  Jari Turunen,et al.  Local field asymmetry drives second-harmonic generation in non-centrosymmetric nanodimers. , 2007, Nano letters.

[16]  Gordon S. Kino,et al.  Field enhancement and gap-dependent resonance in a system of two opposing tip-to-tip Au nanotriangles , 2005 .

[17]  George C. Schatz,et al.  Silver nanoparticle array structures that produce giant enhancements in electromagnetic fields , 2005 .

[18]  J. Zyss,et al.  Local second-harmonic generation enhancement on gold nanostructures probed by two-photon microscopy. , 2003, Optics letters.

[19]  Arto V. Nurmikko,et al.  Strongly Interacting Plasmon Nanoparticle Pairs: From Dipole−Dipole Interaction to Conductively Coupled Regime , 2004 .

[20]  Jari Turunen,et al.  Fourier modal method for the analysis of second-harmonic generation in two-dimensionally periodic structures containing anisotropic materials , 2007 .