Does Cultural Background Influence the Intellectual Performance of Children from Immigrant Groups

Summary: This paper addresses both the construct validity and the criterion-related validity of the “Revisie Amsterdamse Kinder Intelligentie Test” (RAKIT), which is a cognitive ability test developed for primary school children. The present study compared immigrant primary school children (N = 559) and Dutch children (N = 604). The mean scores of Surinamese/Netherlands Antillean, Moroccan, and Turkish children differed from each other and were lower than those of the Dutch children. Comparison of the test dimensions showed that group differences with respect to the construct validity were small. We found some item bias, but the combined effects on the sum score were not large. The estimate of general intelligence (g) as computed with the RAKIT showed strong predictive validity for most school subjects and standardized achievement tests. Although some criteria revealed significant prediction bias, the effects were very small. Most of the analyses we performed on differences in test scores and differences ...

[1]  Jorge L. Mendoza,et al.  A Step-Down Hierarchical Multiple Regression Analysis for Examining Hypotheses About Test Bias in Prediction , 1986 .

[2]  R. Lynn,et al.  Black-White differences in reaction times and intelligence , 1990 .

[3]  A. Jensen,et al.  The g factor , 1996, Nature.

[4]  M. Ree,et al.  PREDICTING TRAINING SUCCESS: NOT MUCH MORE THAN g , 2006 .

[5]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[6]  P. Drenth,et al.  Are reaction time tasks better suited for ethnic minorities than paper-and-pencil tests? , 1991 .

[7]  John Schmid,et al.  The development of hierarchical factor solutions , 1957 .

[8]  L. Gottfredson.  Why g matters: The complexity of everyday life , 1997 .

[9]  R. Sternberg,et al.  Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. , 1996 .

[10]  R. Linn.  Educational measurement, 3rd ed. , 1989 .

[11]  N. Bleichrodt,et al.  Cross-Cultural Testing of Intelligence , 1999 .

[12]  H. Eysenck,et al.  Reaction Times and Intelligence in Chinese and British Children , 1991 .

[13]  Howard T. Everson,et al.  Methodology Review: Statistical Approaches for Assessing Measurement Bias , 1993 .

[14]  Hannah R. Rothstein,et al.  Interrater reliability of job performance ratings: Growth to asymptote level with increasing opportunity to observe. , 1990 .

[15]  W. Resing,et al.  Het gebruik van de Rakit bij allochtoon etnische groepen , 1986 .

[16]  R. Lynn,et al.  Reaction times and intelligence in Korean children. , 1992, The Journal of psychology.

[17]  K. Werle,et al.  Education and intelligence test scores : predictors of dementia? , 2000 .

[18]  J. Braden.  Fact or artifact? An empirical test of Spearman's Hypothesis , 1989 .

[19]  Malcolm James Ree,et al.  Predicting job performance: Not much more than g.. , 1994 .

[20]  A. Jensen,et al.  The nature of the black–white difference on various psychometric tests: Spearman's hypothesis , 1985, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[21]  J. Elshout.  Human cognitive abilities. A survey of factoranalytic studies: John B. Carroll, Cambridge University Press, 1993. Pp. 819. ISBN-0-521-38712-4 paperback , 1995 .

[22]  A. Jensen,et al.  Reaction times and intelligence: a comparison of Chinese-American and Anglo-American children , 1993, Journal of Biosocial Science.

[23]  N. Bleichrodt,et al.  Vergelijkbaarheid van een intelligentietest in India en Nederland , 1998 .

[24]  R L Thorndike,et al.  The Central Role of General Ability in Prediction. , 1985, Multivariate behavioral research.

[25]  A. Jensen,et al.  What is a good g , 1994 .

[26]  Robert J. Sternberg,et al.  Handbook of human intelligence , 1984 .

[27]  M. Ree,et al.  Near identity of cognitive structure in sex and ethnic groups. , 1995 .

[28]  F. Schmidt,et al.  THE VALIDITY and FAIRNESS OF EMPLOYMENT and EDUCATIONAL TESTS FOR HISPANIC AMERICANS: A REVIEW and ANALYSIS , 1980 .

[29]  J. Nijenhuis,et al.  Validity of the Differential Aptitude Test for the Assessment of Immigrant Children , 2000 .

[30]  Dorothy T. Thayer,et al.  Differential Item Performance and the Mantel-Haenszel Procedure. , 1986 .

[31]  F. Schmidt,et al.  The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. , 1998 .

[32]  Stanley A. Mulaik,et al.  First Order or Higher Order General Factor , 1997 .

[33]  Norbert K Tanzer,et al.  Bias and equivalence , 2000 .

[34]  J. Nunnally.  Psychometric Theory (2nd ed), New York: McGraw-Hill. , 1978 .

[35]  John E. Hunter,et al.  Interrater reliability coefficients cannot be computed when only one stimulus is rated. , 1989 .

[36]  F. Schmidt,et al.  Differential validity of employment tests by race: A comprehensive review and analysis. , 1979 .

[37]  J. Nijenhuis,et al.  Bias research in the Netherlands: Review and implications. , 1999 .

[38]  A. Jensen,et al.  Spearman's hypothesis tested with chronometric information-processing tasks , 1993 .

[39]  Robert J. Townsley,et al.  What is a Good? , 1999 .

[40]  T. Shigehisa,et al.  Reaction times and intelligence: a comparison of Japanese and British children , 1991, Journal of Biosocial Science.

[41]  Malcolm James Ree,et al.  The stability of g across different methods of estimation , 1991 .

[42]  A. Jensen,et al.  Bias in Mental Testing , 1981 .

[43]  J. Nijenhuis,et al.  Comparability of GATB scores for immigrants and majority group members: Some Dutch findings. , 1997 .

[44]  A. Evers,et al.  Documentatie van tests en testresearch in Nederland , 2000 .

[45]  J. Carroll.  Human Cognitive Abilities-a sur-vey of factor-analytic studies , 1993 .

[46]  A. Jensen,et al.  Bias in Mental Testing , 1980 .