Hybrid Bayesian Solution to NASA Langley Research Center Multidisciplinary Uncertainty Quantification Challenge

This paper presents a hybrid Bayesian solution to the multidisciplinary uncertainty quantification challenge posed by NASA Langley Research Center. The hybrid approach builds probabilistic models of the outputs by combining the simulations and “experimental” observations provided by NASA. The proposed method is a synergy between Gaussian process surrogate modeling and Bayesian principles, and the resulting tool allows construction of surrogate models, parameter calibration, and variance-based global sensitivity analysis. Besides Sobol indices, a cumulative-density-function-based sensitivity to the probability of failure is also explored. Particle swarm optimization has been used in conjunction with the Gaussian process surrogates to find extreme values of both the mean value of the worst-case requirement function and the failure probability. The capability of the proposed techniques is demonstrated on the four subproblems of uncertainty characterization, sensitivity analysis, uncertainty propagation, and ...

[1]  Riccardo Poli,et al.  Particle swarm optimization , 1995, Swarm Intelligence.

[2]  Liping Wang,et al.  Improving High-Dimensional Physics Models Through Bayesian Calibration With Uncertain Data , 2012 .

[3]  Brian Williams,et al.  A Bayesian calibration approach to the thermal problem , 2008 .

[4]  Liping Wang,et al.  Calibrating Transient Models With Multiple Responses Using Bayesian Inverse Techniques , 2013 .

[5]  Olivier Roustant,et al.  Calculations of Sobol indices for the Gaussian process metamodel , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[6]  Luis G. Crespo,et al.  Bounding the Failure Probability Range of Polynomial Systems Subject to P-box Uncertainties , 2012 .

[7]  Agus Sudjianto,et al.  Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis Methods for Design under Uncertainty , 2004 .

[8]  Dave Higdon,et al.  Combining Field Data and Computer Simulations for Calibration and Prediction , 2005, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[9]  Liping Wang,et al.  Challenges in Uncertainty, Calibration, Validation and Predictability of Engineering Analysis Models , 2011 .

[10]  Luis G. Crespo,et al.  The NASA Langley Multidisciplinary Uncertainty Quantification Challenge , 2014 .

[11]  A. O'Hagan,et al.  Bayesian calibration of computer models , 2001 .

[12]  D. Higdon,et al.  Computer Model Calibration Using High-Dimensional Output , 2008 .

[13]  S. Rahman Reliability Engineering and System Safety , 2011 .

[14]  Geoffrey J. McLachlan,et al.  Finite Mixture Models , 2019, Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application.

[15]  D. Xiu,et al.  Modeling uncertainty in flow simulations via generalized polynomial chaos , 2003 .

[16]  A. O'Hagan,et al.  Probabilistic sensitivity analysis of complex models: a Bayesian approach , 2004 .

[17]  Y.-T. Wu,et al.  COMPUTATIONAL METHODS FOR EFFICIENT STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY AND RELIABILITY SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS , 1993 .

[18]  Bruno Sudret,et al.  Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[19]  John V. Foster,et al.  Dynamics Modeling and Simulation of Large Transport Airplanes in Upset Conditions , 2005 .

[20]  Genghis Khan,et al.  Multimodal Particle Swarm Optimization: Enhancements and Applications , 2012 .

[21]  Thomas L. Jordan,et al.  NASA Langley's AirSTAR Testbed: A Subscale Flight Test Capability for Flight Dynamics and Control System Experiments , 2008 .