Instrumental assessment of atopic eczema: validation of transepidermal water loss, stratum corneum hydration, erythema, scaling, and edema.

BACKGROUND Quantification of skin diseases can be carried out in many ways. Clinical scores are widely used in atopic eczema (AE), and noninvasive instruments are a relevant supplement. OBJECTIVE Our purpose was to validate 5 noninvasive instruments in quantification of AE severity. METHODS In all, 101 patients with AE and 30 control subjects were assessed twice in a clinical cross-sectional examination. Assessment of transepidermal water loss, stratum corneum hydration, erythema, scaling, and subepidermal edema was assessed on 3 predetermined skin sites. RESULTS The methods discriminated among various severity degrees and correlated significantly with objective assessment of disease severity. High correlations were found among instruments assessing acute symptoms of AE. Threshold values for transepidermal water loss and capacitance were found. LIMITATIONS No gold standard exists for severity assessment of atopic eczema. Therefore, the methods used cannot be validated in relation to such a standard. Furthermore, atopic eczema is a generalized disease and the methods used assess target lesions. By assessing target lesions, information about the disease is reduced. CONCLUSION Noninvasive instruments are valuable in quantification of disease severity in a mixed group of patients with active AE. Assessment with ultrasound has contributed new information about the pathophysiology in AE.

[1]  T. Agner Susceptibility of atopic dermatitis patients to irritant dermatitis caused by sodium lauryl sulphate. , 1991, Acta dermato-venereologica.

[2]  M. Ohkido,et al.  STUDIES ON SKIN SURFACE BARRIER FUNCTIONS—SKIN SURFACE LIPIDS AND TRANSEPIDERMAL WATER LOSS IN ATOPIC SKIN DURING CHILDHOOD— , 1978, The Journal of dermatology.

[3]  G. Rajka Transepidermal water loss on the hands in Atopic Dermatitis , 2004, Archiv für dermatologische Forschung.

[4]  S. Seidenari,et al.  Objective assessment of the skin of children affected by atopic dermatitis: a study of pH, capacitance and TEWL in eczematous and clinically uninvolved skin. , 1995, Acta dermato-venereologica.

[5]  M. Gniadecka,et al.  Removal of dermal edema with class I and II compression stockings in patients with lipodermatosclerosis. , 1998, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[6]  P. Clarys,et al.  Skin color measurements: comparison between three instruments: the Chromameter®, the DermaSpectrometer® and the Mexameter® , 2000, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[7]  M. Lodén,et al.  Instrumental and dermatologist evaluation of the effect of glycerine and urea on dry skin in atopic dermatitis , 2001, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[8]  K. Aalto‐Korte Improvement of skin barrier function during treatment of atopic dermatitis. , 1995, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[9]  Williams,et al.  Measurement of body surface area involvement in atopic eczema: an impossible task? , 1999, The British journal of dermatology.

[10]  Brian Everitt,et al.  A Handbook of Statistical Analyses using SAS, Third Edition , 2008 .

[11]  H. Wulf,et al.  UV induced erythema evaluated 24 h post-exposure by skin reflectance and laser Doppler flowmetry is identical in healthy persons and patients with cutaneous malignant melanoma and basal cell cancer. , 1997, Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology.

[12]  D. Altman,et al.  Statistics notes: Calculating correlation coefficients with repeated observations: Part 1—correlation within subjects , 1995 .

[13]  M. Lindberg,et al.  Transepidermal water loss in dry and clinically normal skin in patients with atopic dermatitis. , 1985, Acta dermato-venereologica.

[14]  Vera Rogiers,et al.  EEMCO Guidance for the Assessment of Transepidermal Water Loss in Cosmetic Sciences , 2001, Skin Pharmacology and Physiology.

[15]  H. Sugiura,et al.  Skin barrier function in patients with completely healed atopic dermatitis. , 2000, Journal of dermatological science.

[16]  H. Sugiura,et al.  Occurrence of patchy parakeratosis in normal-appearing skin in patients with active atopic dermatitis and in patients with healed atopic dermatitis: a cause of impaired barrier function of the atopic skin. , 2002, Journal of dermatological science.

[17]  T. Diepgen,et al.  The barrier function in atopic dry skin. Disturbance of membrane-coating granule exocytosis and formation of epidermal lipids? , 1992, Acta dermato-venereologica. Supplementum.

[18]  R. Tupker,et al.  Irritant susceptibility and weal and flare reactions to bioactive agents in atopic dermatitis. I. Influence of disease severity , 1995, The British journal of dermatology.

[19]  G. Rajka,et al.  Diagnostic Features of Atopic Dermatitis , 1980, Acta Dermato-Venereologica.

[20]  J. Serup EEMCO guidance for the assessment of dry skin (xerosis) and ichthyosis: clinical scoring systems , 1995, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[21]  R. Tupker,et al.  Irritant susceptibility and weal and flare reactions to bioactive agents in atopic dermatitis. II. Influence of season , 1995, The British journal of dermatology.

[22]  T. Agner Noninvasive measuring methods for the investigation of irritant patch test reactions. A study of patients with hand eczema, atopic dermatitis and controls. , 1992, Acta dermato-venereologica. Supplementum.

[23]  T. Agner,et al.  Guidelines for transepidermal water loss (TEWL) measurement , 1990, Contact dermatitis.

[24]  P. Elsner,et al.  Assessment of ‘Dry Skin’: Current Bioengineering Methodsa nd Test Designs , 2001, Skin Pharmacology and Physiology.

[25]  Peter Elsner,et al.  Skin Bioengineering: Techniques and Applications in Dermatology and Cosmetology , 1998 .

[26]  H. Wulf,et al.  The Inherent Capacitance of Moisturising Creams: A Source of False Positive Results? , 2000, Skin Pharmacology and Physiology.

[27]  J. Serup,et al.  Characterization of contact dermatitis and atopy using bioengineering techniques. A survey. , 1992, Acta dermato-venereologica. Supplementum.

[28]  G. Jemec,et al.  Handbook of non-invasive methods and the skin, second edition , 2006 .

[29]  E. Berardesca,et al.  EEMCO guidance for the assessment of stratum corneum hydration: electrical methods , 1997, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[30]  J. Ring,et al.  Clinical validation and guidelines for the SCORAD index: consensus report of the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis. , 1997, Dermatology.

[31]  M. Gniadecka Localization of dermal edema in lipodermatosclerosis, lymphedema, and cardiac insufficiency. High-frequency ultrasound examination of intradermal echogenicity. , 1996, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[32]  D. Altman,et al.  Calculating correlation coefficients with repeated observations: Part 2—correlation between subjects , 1995, BMJ.

[33]  H. Wulf,et al.  Assessment of atopic eczema: clinical scoring and noninvasive measurements , 2007, The British journal of dermatology.

[34]  H. Wulf,et al.  Life quality assessment among patients with atopic eczema , 2006, The British journal of dermatology.

[35]  K. Wilhelm,et al.  Guidelines for measurement skin colour and erythema A report from the Standardization Group of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis * , 1996, Contact dermatitis.

[36]  H. Wulf,et al.  Dermal echogenicity: a biological indicator of individual cumulative UVR exposure? , 2004, Archives of Dermatological Research.

[37]  J. Fluhr,et al.  The objective severity assessment of atopic dermatitis score: an objective measure using permeability barrier function and stratum corneum hydration with computer-assisted estimates for extent of disease. , 2003, Archives of dermatology.

[38]  P. Clarys,et al.  In vitro calibration of the capacitance method (Corneometer CM 825) and conductance method (Skicon‐200) for the evaluation of the hydration state of the skin , 1997, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[39]  H. Wulf,et al.  Autofluorescence of human skin is age-related after correction for skin pigmentation and redness. , 2001, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[40]  J. Nater,et al.  Vulnerability of the skin to surfactants in different groups of eczema patients and controls as measured by water vapour loss , 1985, Clinical and experimental dermatology.

[41]  B. Diffey,et al.  Quantitative studies on cutaneous erythema induced by ultraviolet radiation , 1984, The British journal of dermatology.

[42]  H. Heymans,et al.  Severity scoring of atopic dermatitis: a comparison of three scoring systems , 1997, Allergy.

[43]  R. Marks,et al.  Non-invasive in vivo techniques to differentiate photodamage and ageing in human skin. , 1997, Acta dermato-venereologica.

[44]  S Seidenari,et al.  Echographic evaluation with image analysis of normal skin: variations according to age and sex. , 1994, Skin pharmacology : the official journal of the Skin Pharmacology Society.

[45]  Hans Christian Wulf,et al.  Ultrasonographic subepidermal low‐echogenic band, dependence of age and body site , 2004, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.