An experimental test of automatic mitigation of wholesale electricity prices

In several major deregulated electricity generation markets, the market operator uses an "automatic mitigation procedure" (AMP) to attempt to suppress the exercise of market power. A leading type of AMP compares the offer price from each generation unit with a recent historical average of accepted offer prices from that same unit during periods when there was no transmission-system congestion to impede competition. If one or more units' offer prices exceed the recent historical average by more than a specified margin, and if these offer prices raise the market-clearing price by more than a specified margin, the market operator replaces the offending offer prices with lower ones. In an experiment, we test an AMP of this type. We find that it keeps market prices close to marginal cost if generation owners have low market power in uncongested periods. However, with high market power in uncongested periods, a condition that may apply in many parts of the world, the generation owners are able to gradually raise the market price well above short-run marginal cost in spite of the AMP. We also test the effect of the AMP on the frequency with which high-variable-cost units are used, inefficiently, in place of low-variable-cost units.

[1]  James Reitzes,et al.  International Perspectives on Electricity Market Monitoring and Market Power Mitigation , 2007 .

[2]  Udi Helman,et al.  Market power monitoring and mitigation in the US wholesale power markets , 2006 .

[3]  Stephen J. Rassenti,et al.  Deregulating Electric Power: Market Design Issues and Experiments , 1998 .

[4]  Robert J. Thomas,et al.  Energy auctions and market power: an experimental examination , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[5]  L. Kiesling,et al.  An experimental analysis of the effects of automated mitigation procedures on investment and prices in wholesale electricity markets , 2005 .

[6]  J. Nunamaker Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences , 1999 .

[7]  Bart J. Wilson,et al.  Controlling market power and price spikes in electricity networks: Demand-side bidding , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Carine Staropoli,et al.  Using Laboratory Experiments to Design Efficient Market Institutions: Case of Wholesale Electricity Markets , 2006 .

[9]  Hans-Theo Normann,et al.  Laboratory Experiments for Economic Policy Making , 2009 .

[10]  J. Tirole The Theory of Industrial Organization , 1988 .

[11]  Bidding behaviour in the multi-unit Vickrey and uniform price auctions , 2005 .

[12]  C. Plott,et al.  Handbook of Experimental Economics Results , 2008 .

[13]  Robert Entriken,et al.  Agent-Based Simulation of an Automatic Mitigation Procedure , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.