Relation of hospital volume to colostomy rates and survival for patients with rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND Postoperative mortality after some types of cancer surgery is inversely related to the number of operations performed at a hospital (i.e., hospital volume). This study assessed the association of hospital volume with colostomy rates and survival for patients with rectal cancer in a large representative cohort identified from the California Cancer Registry. METHODS We identified 7257 patients diagnosed from January 1, 1994, through December 31, 1997, with stage I-III rectal cancer who underwent surgical resection. Registry data were linked to hospital discharge abstracts and ZIP-code-level data from the 1990 U.S. Census. Associations of hospital volume with permanent colostomy and 30-day mortality were assessed with the Mantel-Haenszel trend test and logistic regression. Overall survival was examined with the Kaplan-Meier method and a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. Multivariable analyses adjusted for demographic and clinical variables and patient clustering within hospitals. All tests of statistical significance were two-sided. RESULTS In unadjusted analyses across decreasing quartiles of hospital volume, we observed statistically significant increases in colostomy rates (29.5%, 31.8%, 35.2%, and 36.6%; P<.001) and in 30-day postoperative mortality (1.6%, 1.6%, 2.9%, and 4.8%; P<.001) and a decrease in 2-year survival (83.7%, 83.2%, 80.9%, and 76.6%; P<.001). The adjusted risks of permanent colostomy (odds ratio [OR] = 1.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.10 to 1.70), 30-day mortality (OR = 2.64, 95% CI = 1.41 to 4.93), and 2-year mortality (hazard ratio = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.15 to 1.44) were greater for patients at hospitals in the lowest volume quartile than for patients at hospitals in the highest volume quartile. Stratification by tumor stage and comorbidity index did not appreciably affect the results. Adjusted colostomy rates varied statistically significantly (P<.001) among individual hospitals independent of volume. CONCLUSIONS Rectal cancer patients who underwent surgery at high-volume hospitals were less likely to have a permanent colostomy and had better survival rates than those treated in low-volume hospitals. Identifying processes of care that contribute to these differences may improve patients' outcomes in all hospitals.

[1]  J. Rasbash,et al.  A User's Guide to MLwiN version 2.0 , 2004 .

[2]  C. Begg,et al.  Hospital and Surgeon Procedure Volume as Predictors of Outcome Following Rectal Cancer Resection , 2002, Annals of surgery.

[3]  Ethan A Halm,et al.  Is Volume Related to Outcome in Health Care? A Systematic Review and Methodologic Critique of the Literature , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[4]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  K. Chu,et al.  Impact of total mesorectal excision on the results of surgery of distal rectal cancer , 2001, The British journal of surgery.

[6]  R. Cress,et al.  Use of Surgical Procedures and Adjuvant Therapy in Rectal Cancer Treatment: A Population-Based Study , 2001, Annals of surgery.

[7]  M. Büchler,et al.  Total mesorectal excision preserves male genital function compared with conventional rectal cancer surgery , 2001, The British journal of surgery.

[8]  H. Lippert,et al.  Hospital caseload and the results achieved in patients with rectal cancer , 2001, The British journal of surgery.

[9]  C. Begg,et al.  The influence of hospital volume on survival after resection for lung cancer. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  C. Fuchs,et al.  Impact of patient and provider characteristics on the treatment and outcomes of colorectal cancer. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[11]  C. Compton,et al.  Impact of number of nodes retrieved on outcome in patients with rectal cancer. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  C. Begg,et al.  Influence of hospital procedure volume on outcomes following surgery for colon cancer. , 2000, JAMA.

[13]  B. Hillner,et al.  Hospital and physician volume or specialization and outcomes in cancer treatment: importance in quality of cancer care. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  T. To,et al.  Hospital procedure volume and teaching status do not influence treatment and outcome measures of rectal cancer surgery in a large general population , 2000, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.

[15]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  The effect of hospital volume on mortality and resource use after radical prostatectomy. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[16]  H. Rockette,et al.  Randomized trial of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy for carcinoma of the rectum: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol R-02. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[17]  Colin D. Johnson,et al.  Quality of life in stoma patients , 1999, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[18]  S. Yao,et al.  Population-based study of relationships between hospital volume of prostatectomies, patient outcomes, and length of hospital stay. , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[19]  N. Christakis,et al.  The performance of different lookback periods and sources of information for Charlson comorbidity adjustment in Medicare claims. , 1999, Medical care.

[20]  M. Choti,et al.  Hospital volume can serve as a surrogate for surgeon volume for achieving excellent outcomes in colorectal resection. , 1999, Annals of surgery.

[21]  K. Havenga,et al.  Improved survival and local control after total mesorectal excision or D3 lymphadenectomy in the treatment of primary rectal cancer: an international analysis of 1411 patients. , 1999, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[22]  F. Kee,et al.  Influence of hospital and clinician workload on survival from colorectal cancer: cohort study. , 1999, BMJ.

[23]  N. Scott,et al.  Influence of volume of work on the outcome of treatment for patients with colorectal cancer , 1999, The British journal of surgery.

[24]  T. To,et al.  Relation between hospital surgical volume and outcome for pancreatic resection for neoplasm in a publicly funded health care system. , 1999, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[25]  C. Begg,et al.  Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. , 1998, JAMA.

[26]  K. Lillemoe,et al.  Importance of hospital volume in the overall management of pancreatic cancer. , 1998, Annals of surgery.

[27]  N. Bickell,et al.  Hospital volume differences and five-year survival from breast cancer. , 1998, American journal of public health.

[28]  W. Hohenberger,et al.  Influence of surgery on metachronous distant metastases and survival in rectal cancer. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[29]  H. Johansson,et al.  Influence of hospital‐ and surgeon‐related factors on outcome after treatment of rectal cancer with or without preoperative radiotherapy , 1997, The British journal of surgery.

[30]  L Påhlman,et al.  Improved survival with preoperative radiotherapy in resectable rectal cancer. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[31]  H. Luft,et al.  The policy implications of using hospital and physician volumes as "indicators" of quality of care in a changing health care environment. , 1997, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[32]  K. Sikora.  Specialist surgeons and survival in breast cancer , 1996, British medical journal.

[33]  R. Aitken,et al.  Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer , 1996, The British journal of surgery.

[34]  R. Herz,et al.  [The quality of life after extirpation of the rectum for carcinoma]. , 1996, Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift.

[35]  J. Chmiel,et al.  Management and survival of patients with adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum: a national survey of the Commission on Cancer. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[36]  N. Aaronson,et al.  Quality of life in colorectal cancer , 1995, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[37]  R. Deyo,et al.  Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. , 1992, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[38]  W. Meyers,et al.  Effective surgical adjuvant therapy for high-risk rectal carcinoma. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[39]  L. J. Wei,et al.  The Robust Inference for the Cox Proportional Hazards Model , 1989 .

[40]  H. Rockette,et al.  Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy for rectal cancer: results from NSABP protocol R-01. , 1988, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[41]  F J Hellinger,et al.  Physician and Hospital Factors Associated With Mortality of Surgical Patients , 1986, Medical care.

[42]  R. Audisio,et al.  Incidence of sexual dysfunction in male patients treated surgically for rectal malignancy , 1985, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[43]  Prolongation of the disease-free interval in surgically treated rectal carcinoma. , 1985, The New England journal of medicine.

[44]  J. Brouillette,et al.  Evaluation of sexual dysfunction in the female following rectal resection and intestinal stoma , 1981, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[45]  D. Carr.  The manual for the staging of cancer. , 1977, Annals of internal medicine.