Comparison of Electrophysiological Correlates of Writing and Speaking: A Topographic ERP Analysis

Behavioral and neuropsychological studies on written production suggested that some cognitive processes are common with spoken production. In this study, we attempted to specify the time course of common processes between the two modalities with event-related brain potentials (ERPs). High density EEG was recorded on twenty two healthy participants during a handwritten and an oral picture naming task on the same 120 stimuli. Waveform analyses and topographical pattern analyses were combined on stimulus- and response-aligned ERPs in order to cover the whole word encoding processing. Similar electrophysiological correlates between writing and speaking appeared until about 260 ms. According to previous estimations of the time course of spoken production, the time period of identical electrophysiological activity corresponds to visual (0–150 ms) semantic (150–190 ms) and lexical-semantic (190–275 ms) processes. Then, spoken and handwritten picture naming starts diverging and display different and modality specific topographical configurations from around 260 ms, i.e., at the beginning of the time-window associated to the encoding of the surface phonological form in spoken production. These results suggested shared conceptual and lexical-semantic processes between speaking and writing and different neurophysiological activity during word-form (phonological or orthographic) encoding.

[1]  杉原 玄一 Interindividual uniformity and variety of the "writing center" : a functional MRI study , 2007 .

[2]  K. Heilman,et al.  Lexical agraphia. Further support for the two-system hypothesis of linguistic agraphia. , 1984, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  Dietrich Lehmann,et al.  Spatial analysis of evoked potentials in man—a review , 1984, Progress in Neurobiology.

[4]  Riitta Salmelin,et al.  Cortical dynamics of visual/semantic vs. phonological analysis in picture confrontation , 2006, NeuroImage.

[5]  Christoph M. Michel,et al.  Early cortical response to behaviorally relevant absence of anticipated outcomes: A human event-related potential study , 2007, NeuroImage.

[6]  Richard J. S. Wise,et al.  The Contribution of the Parietal Lobes to Speaking and Writing , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[7]  William Badecker,et al.  Representational properties common to phonological and orthographic output systems , 1996 .

[8]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Exploring the Activation of Semantic and Phonological Codes during Speech Planning with Event-Related Brain Potentials , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  W. Levelt,et al.  Semantic Category Interference in Overt Picture Naming: Sharpening Current Density Localization by PCA , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[11]  Olaf Hauk,et al.  Electroencephalographic activity over temporal brain areas during phonological encoding in picture naming , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[12]  L. Vignolo,et al.  Dissociated disorders of speaking and writing in aphasia. , 1978, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[13]  M Turennout,et al.  Brain activity during speaking: from syntax to phonology in 40 milliseconds. , 1998, Science.

[14]  P Hagoort,et al.  The Time Course of Grammatical and Phonological Processing During Speaking: Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials , 1999, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[15]  Patrick Bonin,et al.  The determinants of spoken and written picture naming latencies. , 2002, British journal of psychology.

[16]  M. Damian,et al.  The time course of segment and tone encoding in Chinese spoken production: an event-related potential study , 2009, Neuroscience.

[17]  W. Levelt,et al.  The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components , 2004, Cognition.

[18]  Denis Brunet,et al.  Topographic ERP Analyses: A Step-by-Step Tutorial Review , 2008, Brain Topography.

[19]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[20]  Stéphanie Riès,et al.  General-Purpose Monitoring during Speech Production , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[21]  Brigitte Rockstroh,et al.  Grapheme Monitoring in Picture Naming: An Electrophysiological Study of Language Production , 2004, Brain Topography.

[22]  S. Morand,et al.  Electric source imaging of human brain functions , 2001, Brain Research Reviews.

[23]  G S Dell,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. , 1986, Psychological review.

[24]  Cyril Perret,et al.  Comparing Electrophysiological Correlates of Word Production in Immediate and Delayed Naming Through the Analysis of Word Age of Acquisition Effects , 2011, Brain Topography.

[25]  Albert Costa,et al.  Tracking lexical access in speech production: electrophysiological correlates of word frequency and cognate effects. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[26]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  Information flow in the mental lexicon during speech planning: evidence from event-related brain potentials. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[27]  Marina Laganaro,et al.  Time Course of Evoked-potential Changes in Different Forms of Anomia in Aphasia , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  T. Jaeger,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.

[29]  Maya L. Henry,et al.  The role of left perisylvian cortical regions in spelling , 2007, Brain and Language.

[30]  Dirk Koester,et al.  Morphological priming in overt language production: Electrophysiological evidence from Dutch , 2008, NeuroImage.

[31]  Micah M. Murray,et al.  Rapid Brain Discrimination of Sounds of Objects , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  A. Caramazza How many levels of processing are there in lexical access , 1997 .

[33]  Gerard P. van Galen,et al.  Handwriting: Issues for a psychomotor theory ☆ , 1991 .

[34]  M. Fayol,et al.  An Experimental Study of Lexical Access in the Writing and Naming of Isolated Words , 1998 .

[35]  Cyril Perret,et al.  Why are written picture naming latencies (not) longer than spoken naming? , 2013 .

[36]  William Badecker,et al.  The structure of graphemic representations in spelling: Evidence from a case of acquired dysgraphia , 1994 .

[37]  A. Venneri,et al.  A case for case: handling letter case selection in written spelling , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[38]  Christoph M. Michel,et al.  Spatiotemporal Analysis of Multichannel EEG: CARTOOL , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[39]  Jean-François Démonet,et al.  The graphemic/motor frontal area Exner's area revisited , 2009, Annals of neurology.

[40]  Patrick Bonin,et al.  A new set of 299 pictures for psycholinguistic studies: French norms for name agreement, image agreement, conceptual familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, age of acquisition, and naming latencies , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[41]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Segmentation of brain electrical activity into microstates: model estimation and validation , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[42]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[43]  M. Murray,et al.  EEG source imaging , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[44]  Jean-François Démonet,et al.  Writing-specific sites in frontal areas: a cortical stimulation study. , 2004, Journal of neurosurgery.

[45]  Stéphanie Morand,et al.  Re-evaluating the Time Course of Gender and Phonological Encoding During Silent Monitoring Tasks Estimated by ERP: Serial or Parallel Processing? , 2010, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[46]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[47]  Pélagie M. Beeson,et al.  Neuroanatomical Correlates of Spelling and Writing , 2002 .

[48]  R. Salmelin,et al.  Adult Brain Plasticity Elicited by Anomia Treatment , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[49]  M. Kutas,et al.  Electrophysiological estimates of the time course of semantic and phonological encoding during listening and naming , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[50]  Theodor Landis,et al.  Right parietal brain activity precedes perceptual alternation of bistable stimuli. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[51]  A. Caramazza,et al.  The structure of graphemic representations , 1990, Cognition.

[52]  Anne Cutler,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[53]  W. Levelt,et al.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .

[54]  M. Sugishita,et al.  A functional MRI study on the neural substrates for writing , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[55]  E. Warrington,et al.  Ideational agraphia: a single case study. , 1986, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[56]  R. Peereman,et al.  Do Phonological Codes Constrain the Selection of Orthographic Codes in Written Picture Naming , 2001 .

[57]  F X Alario,et al.  A set of 400 pictures standardized for French: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, and age of acquisition , 1999, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.