The Balanced Scorecard: Judgmental Effects of Common and Unique Performance Measures

The balanced scorecard is a new tool that complements traditional measures of business unit performance. The scorecard contains a diverse set of performance measures, including financial performance, customer relations, internal business processes, and learning and growth. Advocates of the balanced scorecard suggest that each unit in the organization should develop and use its own scorecard, choosing measures that capture the unit's business strategy. Our study examines judgmental effects of the balanced scorecard—specifically, how balanced scorecards that include some measures common to multiple units and other measures that are unique to a particular unit affect superiors' evaluations of that unit's performance. Our test shows that only the common measures affect the superiors' evaluations. We discuss the implications of this result for research and practice.

[1]  R. Fisch,et al.  Effect of High and Low Motivation on Two Aspects of Attention , 1964, Perceptual and motor skills.

[2]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Dimensional Commensurability and Cue Utilization in Comparative Judgment. , 1974 .

[3]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Sensitivity, Precision, and Linear Aggregation of Signals for Performance Evaluation , 1989 .

[4]  Lawrence A. Gordon,et al.  Information overload: A temporal approach☆ , 1990 .

[5]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  Multitask Principal–Agent Analyses: Incentive Contracts, Asset Ownership, and Job Design , 1991 .

[6]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.

[7]  John Y. Lee.  How to Make Financial and Nonfinancial Data Add Up , 1992 .

[8]  John W. Payne,et al.  The adaptive decision maker: Name index , 1993 .

[9]  R. Kaplan,et al.  PUTTING THE BALANCED SCORECARD TO WORK , 1993 .

[10]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The adaptive decision maker , 1993 .

[11]  M. Nourayi,et al.  Performance Evaluation And Measurement Issues , 1996 .

[12]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system , 1996 .

[13]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  The Evaluability Hypothesis: An Explanation for Preference Reversals between Joint and Separate Evaluations of Alternatives , 1996 .

[14]  D. Grinnell,et al.  The Use of Strategic Performance Variables as Leading Indicators in Financial Analyst's Forecasts , 1997 .

[15]  Robert A. Simons,et al.  Citibank: Performance Evaluation , 1997 .

[16]  E. Ziegel,et al.  The Balanced Scorecard , 1998 .

[17]  Christopher K. Hsee.  Less is Better: When Low-Value Options are Valued More Highly than High-Value Options , 1998 .

[18]  Brian C. Spilker,et al.  The Influence of Client Preferences on Tax Professionals' Search for Judicial Precedents, Subsequent Judgments and Recommendations , 1999 .