Controllability and Robustness of Functional and Structural Connectomic Networks in Glioma Patients

Simple Summary Gliomas are known to impact on large-scale networks beyond the tumor location, but it is unknown how the tumor affects controllability and robustness of neural networks. We applied advanced control theory algorithms on connectivity data of structural and functional networks of prognostically differing glioma patients and healthy controls. We determined the driver nodes of the default-mode network (DMN), which are receptive to outside signals, and critical nodes as the most important elements for network controllability. Patients showed decreased network controllability and robustness mainly in the isocitratedehydrogenase (IDH) wildtype group, while additional topological shifts of driver and critical nodes were observed mainly in the prognostically more favourable IDH mutated patients. We hereby suggest a novel approach for elucidating disease evolution in brain cancer, which may aid in defining potential treatment targets under the aspects of network controllability and robustness in glioma patients. Abstract Previous studies suggest that the topological properties of structural and functional neural networks in glioma patients are altered beyond the tumor location. These alterations are due to the dynamic interactions with large-scale neural circuits. Understanding and describing these interactions may be an important step towards deciphering glioma disease evolution. In this study, we analyze structural and functional brain networks in terms of determining the correlation between network robustness and topological features regarding the default-mode network (DMN), comparing prognostically differing patient groups to healthy controls. We determine the driver nodes of these networks, which are receptive to outside signals, and the critical nodes as the most important elements for controllability since their removal will dramatically affect network controllability. Our results suggest that network controllability and robustness of the DMN is decreased in glioma patients. We found losses of driver and critical nodes in patients, especially in the prognostically less favorable IDH wildtype (IDHwt) patients, which might reflect lesion-induced network disintegration. On the other hand, topological shifts of driver and critical nodes, and even increases in the number of critical nodes, were observed mainly in IDH mutated (IDHmut) patients, which might relate to varying degrees of network plasticity accompanying the chronic disease course in some of the patients, depending on tumor growth dynamics. We hereby implement a novel approach for further exploring disease evolution in brain cancer under the aspects of neural network controllability and robustness in glioma patients.

[1]  K. Peck,et al.  Brain Functional Connectivity in Low- and High-Grade Gliomas: Differences in Network Dynamics Associated with Tumor Grade and Location , 2022, Cancers.

[2]  C. Stam,et al.  Regional healthy brain activity, glioma occurrence and symptomatology , 2022, medRxiv.

[3]  A. Meyer-Baese,et al.  Structural Target Controllability of Brain Networks in Dementia , 2021, 2021 43rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC).

[4]  M. V. van Zandvoort,et al.  The frontal aslant tract and its role in executive functions: a quantitative tractography study in glioma patients , 2021, Brain Imaging and Behavior.

[5]  H. Duffau Dynamic Interplay between Lower-Grade Glioma Instability and Brain Metaplasticity: Proposal of an Original Model to Guide the Therapeutic Strategy , 2021, Cancers.

[6]  M. Wiesmann,et al.  Dissociation of structural and functional connectomic coherence in glioma patients , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[7]  H. Duffau,et al.  Homotopic redistribution of functional connectivity in insula-centered diffuse low-grade glioma , 2021, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[8]  H. Duffau Can Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Be Considered to Facilitate Reoperation for Low-Grade Glioma Relapse by Eliciting Neuroplasticity? , 2020, Frontiers in Neurology.

[9]  J. Suckling,et al.  Genetic, cellular, and connectomic characterization of the brain regions commonly plagued by glioma , 2020, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[10]  Guanrong Chen,et al.  A Framework of Hierarchical Attacks to Network Controllability , 2020, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul..

[11]  M. Wiesmann,et al.  Asymmetric tumor‐related alterations of network‐specific intrinsic functional connectivity in glioma patients , 2020, Human brain mapping.

[12]  Hesheng Liu,et al.  Resting-state fMRI Detects Alterations in Whole Brain Connectivity Related to Tumor Biology in Glioma Patients. , 2020, Neuro-oncology.

[13]  M. Wiesmann,et al.  Diffusion Tensor Imaging Reveals Microstructural Heterogeneity of Normal-Appearing White Matter and Related Cognitive Dysfunction in Glioma Patients , 2019, Front. Oncol..

[14]  Ignacio A. Illán,et al.  Dynamical Graph Theory Networks Methods for the Analysis of Sparse Functional Connectivity Networks and for Determining Pinning Observability in Brain Networks , 2017, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[15]  M. V. van Zandvoort,et al.  Tumor-related neurocognitive dysfunction in patients with diffuse glioma: a systematic review of neurocognitive functioning prior to anti-tumor treatment , 2017, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[16]  Linda Douw,et al.  Connectomic profile and clinical phenotype in newly diagnosed glioma patients , 2017, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[17]  Zhe-Ming Lu,et al.  Attack Vulnerability of Network Controllability , 2016, PloS one.

[18]  G. Reifenberger,et al.  The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary , 2016, Acta Neuropathologica.

[19]  O. Garaschuk,et al.  Brain tumour cells interconnect to a functional and resistant network , 2015, Nature.

[20]  Alexander R. Pico,et al.  Glioma Groups Based on 1p/19q, IDH, and TERT Promoter Mutations in Tumors. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  Kyle R. Noll,et al.  Relationships between tumor grade and neurocognitive functioning in patients with glioma of the left temporal lobe prior to surgical resection. , 2015, Neuro-oncology.

[22]  Meng Li,et al.  Disrupted brain anatomical connectivity in medication-naïve patients with first-episode schizophrenia , 2015, Brain Structure and Function.

[23]  Linda Douw,et al.  Neural network alterations underlie cognitive deficits in brain tumor patients , 2014, Current opinion in oncology.

[24]  H. Duffau The huge plastic potential of adult brain and the role of connectomics: New insights provided by serial mappings in glioma surgery , 2014, Cortex.

[25]  John Doyle,et al.  Study of the brain functional network using synthetic data , 2014, 2014 52nd Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton).

[26]  Jean M. Vettel,et al.  Controllability of structural brain networks , 2014, Nature Communications.

[27]  Wen-Xu Wang,et al.  Exact controllability of complex networks , 2013, Nature Communications.

[28]  Thomas R. Knösche,et al.  White matter integrity, fiber count, and other fallacies: The do's and don'ts of diffusion MRI , 2013, NeuroImage.

[29]  P. Dechent,et al.  Glioma infiltration of the corpus callosum: early signs detected by DTI , 2013, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[30]  Cunlai Pu,et al.  Robustness analysis of network controllability , 2012 .

[31]  Gian Luca Romani,et al.  Modifications of Default-Mode Network Connectivity in Patients with Cerebral Glioma , 2012, PloS one.

[32]  Dirk Troost,et al.  Addressing diffuse glioma as a systemic brain disease with single-cell analysis. , 2012, Archives of neurology.

[33]  Piet Van Mieghem,et al.  Graph Spectra for Complex Networks , 2010 .

[34]  A. Willsky,et al.  Consistent and efficient reconstruction of latent tree models , 2010, 2010 48th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton).

[35]  J. Henson,et al.  Plasticity , 2010, Neurology.

[36]  O. Ganslandt,et al.  Diffusion tensor imaging and white matter tractography in patients with brainstem lesions , 2007, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[37]  M. Desmurget,et al.  Contrasting acute and slow-growing lesions: a new door to brain plasticity. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[38]  M. Burke,et al.  BOLD response during uncoupling of neuronal activity and CBF , 2006, NeuroImage.

[39]  J D Pickard,et al.  Diffusion tensor imaging of brain tumours at 3T: a potential tool for assessing white matter tract invasion? , 2003, Clinical radiology.

[40]  D. J. Warren,et al.  High-resolution two-dimensional spatial mapping of cat striate cortex using a 100-microelectrode array , 2001, Neuroscience.

[41]  K Doi,et al.  Computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms: applications of artificial neural networks. , 1992, Medical physics.

[42]  C. N. Liu,et al.  Approximating discrete probability distributions with dependence trees , 1968, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[43]  Susan Y. Bookheimer,et al.  Altered functional connectivity of the default mode network in diffuse gliomas measured with pseudo-resting state fMRI , 2013, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[44]  M. Fiedler Algebraic connectivity of graphs , 1973 .