Microscale Variability of Atrazine and Chloride Leaching Under Field Conditions

Pesticide leaching experiments using widely spaced sampling sites may not adequately characterize chemical leaching behavior such as nonuniform flow between sampling points. We conducted this study to determine the three-dimensional variability of atrazine and chloride movement within a small volume of soil (2,700 cm1) under field conditions. A 1-m2area of Williamson silt loam (coarse-silty, mixed, mesic, Typic Fragiochrept) was sprayed uniformly with atrazine (1.1 kg ai/ha) and chloride (80 kg/ha). We used the Leaching Estimation and Chemistry Model (LEACHM) to simulate chemical movement. After 6.5 cm of rainfall during a 29-d period, we sampled 36 squares (5 by 5 cm) in the central 30- by 30-cm portion of the treated area at six depth increments (0 to 2, 2 to 5, 5 to 10, 10 to 15, 15 to 21, and 21 to 30 cm) and determined atrazine and Cl−concentrations. We recovered 26% of the applied atrazine and 138% of the applied chloride. Low atrazine recovery may have been due to leaching beyond 30 cm and/or degradation while excess chloride recovery is attributed to high background concentrations. Coefficients of variation (CVs) for atrazine significantly increased with depth and ranged from 26 to 353%, while CVs for Cl−were independent of depth and ranged from 32 to 66%. Derived atrazine concentration isograms illustrated highly nonuniform herbicide transport. Although LEACHM overestimated atrazine movement in the upper 15 cm, it was fairly accurate in the lower 15 cm. The overall trend in Cl−flow was adequately predicted, even though the predicted Cl−concentrations were underestimated. LEACHM could not accurately predict nonuniform flow or the variability in solute concentrations between points. However, its prediction of the atrazine center of mass (about 4.7 cm) agreed well with the derived isograms. These findings demonstrate that localized nonideal solute transport may be missed in larger sampling schemes and in simulation models.

[1]  B. Lennartz,et al.  Laboratory method for studying pesticide dissipation in the vadose zone , 1993 .

[2]  E. Thurman,et al.  Herbicides in surface waters of the midwestern United States: the effect of spring flush , 1991 .

[3]  David Pimentel,et al.  CRC handbook of pest management in agriculture , 1990 .

[4]  Kurt D. Pennell,et al.  Evaluation of Five Simulation Models for Predicting Aldicarb and Bromide Behavior Under Field Conditions , 1990 .

[5]  Warren A. Dick,et al.  Initial storm effects on macrospore transport of surface-applied chemical in no-till soil , 1990 .

[6]  A. G. Hornsby,et al.  Fate of Aldicarb in the unsaturated zone beneath a citrus grove , 1990 .

[7]  D. Whittemore,et al.  Movement and fate of atrazine and bromide in central Kansas croplands , 1990 .

[8]  W. Jury,et al.  Field Study of Napropamide Movement Through Unsaturated Soil , 1986 .

[9]  William A. Jury,et al.  A field test of the transfer function model for predicting solute transport , 1982 .

[10]  R. E. Phillips,et al.  Consequences of Water Movement in Macropores 1 , 1979 .

[11]  J. Chandler,et al.  Soil Sample Variation and Herbicide Incorporation Uniformity , 1977, Weed Science.

[12]  E. L. Robinson Herbicide Distribution in a Block of Soil , 1976, Weed Science.

[13]  J. W. Biggar,et al.  Spatial variability of the leaching characteristics of a field soil , 1976 .

[14]  W. Edwards,et al.  Sample variability and the measurement of dieldrin content of a soil in the field. , 1971, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[15]  E. G. Rodgers Leaching of Seven s-Triazines , 1968, Weed Science.

[16]  E. Knüsli History of the development of triazine herbicides , 1970 .