Sustainability through reuse: a reconfigurable structural system for residential and office buildings

Current load-bearing systems for buildings rarely have a beneficial end of life. Modular design is a proven solution for revalorizing obsolete structures, but it hardly competes with conventional solutions: the range of future spatial configurations that the modules will accommodate is usually too limited to balance additional upfront costs due to necessary oversized elements and extra connections. Through a review of building demolition cases, this paper first presents motives, challenges and requirements for overcoming adverse end-of-life environmental impacts of building structures. Then a new structural system addressing the specified design constraints is introduced. The system is a highly versatile kit of slab and column elements. Contrary to existing modular solutions, its element dimensions do neither constrain the positioning of columns nor the shape of floor plans. Slab elements are stacked vertically to tune bending and shear stiffnesses locally and ensure serviceability requirements for a wide range of column and load cases layouts. All connections between elements are reversible and ready for reuse. Accordingly, the proposed structural system is well-suited for multiple service cycles and architectural needs, mitigating the detrimental effects that buildings have on the environment.

[1]  Heidi Merrild,et al.  Building a Circular Future , 2016 .

[2]  Qiping Shen,et al.  Comparative study of greenhouse gas emissions between off-site prefabrication and conventional construction methods: Two case studies of residential projects , 2013 .

[3]  Shigeru Ban Tamedia Office Building , 2013 .

[4]  Corentin Fivet,et al.  Design of Load-Bearing Systems for Open-Ended Downstream Reuse , 2019, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science.

[5]  John D. Quale,et al.  Construction Matters: Comparing Environmental Impacts of Building Modular and Conventional Homes in the United States , 2012 .

[6]  C. Fivet,et al.  Nothing is lost, nothing is created, everything is reused: structural design for a circular economy , 2020, The Structural Engineer.

[7]  C. De Wolf,et al.  Can timber lower the environmental impact of tall buildings? , 2019, Structures and Architecture: Bridging the Gap and Crossing Borders.

[8]  Muhammad Irfan,et al.  Carbon Footprint of Ready Mix Concrete and the Role of Environmental Classification Systems , 2011 .

[9]  Xiaoling Zhang,et al.  Factors influencing the service lifespan of buildings: An improved hedonic model , 2014 .

[10]  Francesco Pomponi,et al.  Circular economy for the built environment: A research framework , 2017 .

[11]  J. Bongaarts,et al.  United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division World Family Planning 2020: Highlights, United Nations Publications, 2020. 46 p. , 2020 .

[12]  Alistair G.F. Gibb,et al.  Constraints to the Use of Off-site Production on Construction Projects , 2005 .

[13]  Niels De Temmerman,et al.  Environmental impact minimization of reticular structures made of reused and new elements through Life Cycle Assessment and Mixed-Integer Linear Programming , 2020 .