Applying flow resistance equations to overland flows

Resistance to flow determines routing velocities and must be adequately represented both within stream channels and over hillslopes when making predictions of streamflow and soil erosion. The limiting assumptions inherent in flow resistance equations can be relaxed if the spatial and temporal scale over which they are applied is restricted. This requires a substantial methodological advance in the study of overland flows over natural surfaces. It is suggested that terrestrial laser scanning will allow a greater understanding of overland flow hydraulics and present opportunities to investigate resistance to flow over complex morphologies. The Darcy-Weisbach, Chézy and Manning equations are the most widely used empirical equations for the calculation of flow velocity in runoff and erosion models. These equations rest on analyses originally developed for one-dimensional pipe flows and assume conditions which are not met by overland flows. The following assumptions are brought into question: flow can be described as uniform; flow is parallel to the surface; flow is of a constant width and the boundary to the flow is longitudinally uniform; grain roughness is homogeneous over the wetted perimeter and can be considered as random; form roughness and other sources of flow resistance can be ignored; resistance is independent of flow depth; and resistance can be modelled as a function of the Reynolds number. A greater appreciation of the processes contributing to resistance to overland flows must be developed. This paper also presents a brief history of the development of flow resistance equations.

[1]  F. Bretherton,et al.  Stability and the conservation of mass in drainage basin evolution , 1972 .

[2]  M. G. Anderson,et al.  Runoff and erosion on semi-arid hillslopes. , 1996 .

[3]  T. Myers Modeling laminar sheet flow over rough surfaces , 2002 .

[4]  John Pitlick,et al.  Observations of Flow and Sediment Entrainment on a Large Gravel-Bed River , 1996 .

[5]  Stuart N. Lane Roughness – time for a re-evaluation? , 2005 .

[6]  John Wainwright,et al.  On determining resistance to interrill overland flow , 1994 .

[7]  Anthony J. Parsons,et al.  Determining the mean depth of overland flow in field studies of flow hydraulics , 1990 .

[8]  A. D. Roo,et al.  LISEM: a single-event physically based hydrological and soil erosion model for drainage basins; I: theory, input and output , 1996 .

[9]  Keith Richards,et al.  Estimation of flow resistance in gravel‐bedded rivers: A physical explanation of the multiplier of roughness length , 1992 .

[10]  A. Steegen,et al.  The influence of both process descriptions and runoff patterns on predictions from a spatially distributed soil erosion model , 2005, Earth Surface Processes and Landforms.

[11]  Pierre Y. Julien,et al.  River mechanics: Frontmatter , 2002 .

[12]  D. Dunkerley Estimating the mean speed of laminar overland flow using dye injection‐uncertainty on rough surfaces , 2001 .

[13]  P. Wilcock Estimating Local Bed Shear Stress from Velocity Observations , 1996 .

[14]  J. Savat The hydraulics of sheet flow on a smooth surface and the effect of simulated rainfall , 1977 .

[15]  J. Gessler Friction Factor of Armored River Beds , 1990 .

[16]  Velocity Profiles in Steep Open‐Channel Flows , 1992 .

[17]  W. Marcus,et al.  AN EVALUATION OF METHODS FOR ESTIMATING MANNING'S n IN SMALL MOUNTAIN STREAMS , 1992 .

[18]  André Robert,et al.  Boundary roughness in coarse-grained channels , 1990 .

[19]  Edwin T. Engman,et al.  Roughness coefficients for routing surface runoff , 1983 .

[20]  Richard D. Hey,et al.  Flow Resistance in Gravel-Bed Rivers , 1979 .

[21]  Vito Ferro,et al.  Flow Velocity Profiles in Gravel‐Bed Rivers , 1994 .

[22]  S. Lawrence Dingman,et al.  Statistical development and validation of discharge equations for natural channels , 1997 .

[23]  P. Bates,et al.  Modelling floodplain flows using a two-dimensional finite element model , 1992 .

[24]  L. D. Norton,et al.  Soil erosion by surface water flow on a stony, semiarid hillslope , 1999 .

[25]  G. Smart COEFFICIENT OF FRICTION FOR FLOW RESISTANCE IN ALLUVIAL CHANNELS. , 1999 .

[26]  L. Prandtl,et al.  The Mechanics of Viscous Fluids , 1935 .

[27]  J. Poesen,et al.  The European Soil Erosion Model (EUROSEM): A dynamic approach for predicting sediment transport from fields and small catchments. , 1998 .

[28]  André Robert,et al.  Scales of boundary resistance in coarse-grained channels : turbulent velocity profiles and implications , 2001 .

[29]  A. N. Strahler DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS APPLIED TO FLUVIALLY ERODED LANDFORMS , 1958 .

[30]  William W. Emmett,et al.  The hydraulics of overland flow on hillslopes , 1968 .

[31]  J. Savat Resistance to flow in rough supercritical sheet flow , 1980 .

[32]  Gerard Govers,et al.  Relationship between discharge, velocity and flow area for rills eroding loose, non‐layered materials , 1992 .

[33]  A. Parsons,et al.  Resistance to overland flow on desert hillslopes , 1986 .

[34]  J. Poesen,et al.  Effects of rock fragment size and cover on overland flow hydraulics, local turbulence and sediment yield on an erodible soil surface , 1994 .

[35]  A. Roy,et al.  Reach scale variability of turbulent flow characteristics in a gravel-bed river , 2005 .

[36]  Anthony J. Parsons,et al.  Field measurement of the velocity of overland flow using dye tracing , 1986 .

[37]  K. Richards,et al.  Sensitivity of bed shear stress estimated from vertical velocity profiles: the problem of sampling resolution , 1998 .

[38]  L. D. Norton,et al.  Hydraulics and erosion in eroding rills , 1997 .

[39]  John Wainwright,et al.  Resistance to overland flow on semiarid grassland and shrubland hillslopes, Walnut Gulch, southern Arizona , 1994 .

[40]  H Chatley,et al.  CORRESPONDENCE. TURBULENT FLOW IN PIPES, WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO THE TRANSITION REGION BETWEEN THE SMOOTH AND ROUGH PIPE LAWS. (INCLUDES PLATES). , 1939 .

[41]  Maurice J. Duncan,et al.  Relatively Rough Flow Resistance Equations , 2002 .

[42]  L. G. Straub Studies of the transition-region between lunar and turbulent flow in open channels , 1939 .

[43]  D. Dunkerley Flow threads in surface run‐off: implications for the assessment of flow properties and friction coefficients in soil erosion and hydraulics investigations , 2004 .

[44]  K. Prestegaard Variables influencing water-surface slopes in gravel-bed streams at bankfull stage , 1983 .

[45]  Zhang Guanghui,et al.  Estimating Manning's n for steep slopes , 2003 .

[46]  S. Tait,et al.  Determining hydraulic resistance in gravel‐bed rivers from the dynamics of their water surfaces , 2006 .

[47]  D. S. L. Lawrence,et al.  Macroscale surface roughness and frictional resistance in overland flow , 1997 .

[48]  Arthur R. M. Nowell,et al.  Turbulent flow in a depth‐limited boundary layer , 1979 .

[49]  R. D. Jarrett Hydraulics of High-Gradient Streams , 1984 .

[50]  John E. Gilley,et al.  Hydraulic Roughness Coefficients as Affected by Random Roughness , 1991 .

[51]  Gerard Govers,et al.  Hydraulics of interrill overland flow on rough, bare soil surfaces , 2000 .

[52]  R. Horton,et al.  Laminar sheet‐flow , 1934 .

[53]  G. H. Keulegan,et al.  Laws of turbulent flow in open channels , 1938 .

[54]  R. Ferguson,et al.  Spatial patterns of bedload transport and channel change in braided and near braided rivers , 1992 .

[55]  O. Reynolds III. An experimental investigation of the circumstances which determine whether the motion of water shall be direct or sinuous, and of the law of resistance in parallel channels , 1883, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London.

[56]  A. Parsons,et al.  Resistance to Overland Flow on Desert Pavement and Its Implications for Sediment Transport Modeling , 1991 .

[57]  D. S. L. Lawrence,et al.  Hydraulic resistance in overland flow during partial and marginal surface inundation: Experimental observations and modeling , 2000 .

[58]  G. Hagen,et al.  Ueber die Bewegung des Wassers in engen cylindrischen Röhren , 1839 .

[59]  J. Roels Flow resistance in concentrated overland flow on rough slope surfaces , 1984 .

[60]  R. Ferguson Flow resistance equations for gravel‐ and boulder‐bed streams , 2007 .

[61]  R. Horton EROSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF STREAMS AND THEIR DRAINAGE BASINS; HYDROPHYSICAL APPROACH TO QUANTITATIVE MORPHOLOGY , 1945 .

[62]  K. A. Flack,et al.  Velocity-defect scaling for turbulent boundary layers with a range of relative roughness , 2005 .

[63]  Katharina Helming,et al.  Soil roughness and overland flow , 2000 .