Chinese Graduate Students and U.S. Scientific Productivity

Abstract The migration of young Chinese scientists to undertake graduate studies in U.S. universities is arguably one of the most important recent episodes of skilled migration. Using a new data set covering around 16,000 Ph.D. graduates in 161 U.S. chemistry departments, we show that Chinese students have a scientific output during their thesis that is significantly higher than other students. In fact, conditional on acceptance into the same programs, Chinese students perform about as well as the awardees of the NSF doctoral fellowship program. These results shed new light on the benefits of student migration on scientific productivity of destination countries.

[1]  William R. Kerr,et al.  Skilled Immigration and the Employment Structures of US Firms , 2013, Journal of Labor Economics.

[2]  William R. Kerr,et al.  Ethnic Scientific Communities and International Technology Diffusion , 2007, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[3]  Frédéric Docquier,et al.  Brain Drain and Human Capital Formation in Developing Countries: Winners and Losers , 2008 .

[4]  J. Roh.  What predicts whether foreign doctorate recipients from U.S. institutions stay in the United States: foreign doctorate recipients in science and engineering fields from 2000 to 2010 , 2013 .

[5]  M. Finn,et al.  Stay Rates of Foreign Doctorate Recipients from U.S. Universities, 2001 , 2014 .

[6]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Are the Foreign Born a Source of Strength for U.S. Science? , 1999, Science.

[8]  Haizheng Li,et al.  Higher Education in China: Complement or Competition to US Universities? , 2010 .

[9]  George J. Borjas,et al.  Native Internal Migration and the Labor Market Impact of Immigration , 2005, The Journal of Human Resources.

[10]  William J. Carrington,et al.  Migration with endogenous moving costs. , 1996 .

[11]  Silvana Tenreyro,et al.  The Log of Gravity , 2004 .

[12]  Richard E. Attiyeh,et al.  Testing for Bias in Graduate School Admissions , 1997 .

[13]  John Whalley,et al.  The Higher Educational Transformation of China and its Global Implications , 2008 .

[14]  Paula E. Stephan.  The Biomedical Workforce in the US: An Example of Positive Feedbacks , 2010 .

[15]  T. Hoffer,et al.  TIME TO DEGREE OF U . S . RESEARCH DOCTORATE RECIPIENTS , 2006 .

[16]  John V. Winters.  Foreign and Native-Born Stem Graduates and Innovation Intensity in the United States , 2014 .

[17]  John Bound,et al.  Internationalization of U.S. Doctorate Education , 2009 .

[18]  G. Borjas.  Self-Selection and the Earnings of Immigrants , 1987, Foundations of Migration Economics.

[19]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  International Competition for PhDs and Postdoctoral Scholars: What Does (and Does Not) Matter , 2014, Innovation Policy and the Economy.

[20]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Quasi‐Likelihood Methods for Count Data , 2008 .

[21]  G. Borjas.  Do Foreign Students Crowd Out Native Students from Graduate Programs? , 2004 .

[22]  W. Kerr.  The Ethnic Composition of US Inventors , 2008 .

[23]  J. Bound,et al.  Internationalization of U.S. Doctorate Education. NBER Working Paper No. 14792. , 2009 .

[24]  Stay Rates of Foreign Doctorate Recipients from U.S. Universities, 2005 , 2008 .

[25]  A. Agrawal,et al.  NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES BRAIN DRAIN OR BRAIN BANK? THE IMPACT OF SKILLED EMIGRATION ON POOR-COUNTRY INNOVATION , 2008 .

[26]  G. Borjas.  The economic analysis of immigration , 1995 .

[27]  William R. Kerr,et al.  Firms and the Economics of Skilled Immigration , 2014, Innovation Policy and the Economy.

[28]  G. Jasso,et al.  Self-Selection and the Earnings of Immigrants: Comment , 1990 .

[29]  Max Nathan.  The wider economic impacts of high-skilled migrants: a survey of the literature for receiving countries , 2013, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[30]  István Hargittai.  The Road to Stockholm , 2002 .

[31]  D. McKenzie,et al.  Self-Selection Patterns in Mexico-U.S. Migration: The Role of Migration Networks , 2007, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[32]  Patrick Gaulé,et al.  Who comes back and when? Return migration decisions of academic scientists , 2014 .

[33]  Devesh Kapur,et al.  Give Us Your Best and Brightest: The Global Hunt for Talent and Its Impact on the Developing World , 2005 .

[34]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  The Increased Frequency and Duration of the Postdoctorate Career Stage , 2005 .

[35]  P. Jensen.  Understanding the Impact of Migration on Innovation , 2014 .

[36]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R&D Relationship , 1984 .

[37]  Richard B. Freeman,et al.  Supporting "the Best and Brightest" in Science and Engineering: Nsf Graduate Research Fellowships , 2005 .

[38]  Richard B. Freeman.  What Does Global Expansion of Higher Education Mean for the Us? , 2009 .

[39]  X. Lan.  Permanent Visas and Temporary Jobs: Evidence from Postdoctoral Participation of Foreign PhDs in the United States , 2012 .

[40]  J. Hunt,et al.  Which Immigrants Are Most Innovative and Entrepreneurial? Distinctions by Entry Visa , 2009, Journal of Labor Economics.

[41]  Jeffrey Mervis,et al.  Top Ph.D. Feeder Schools Are Now Chinese , 2008, Science.

[42]  Silvana Tenreyro,et al.  The Log of Gravity , 2004, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[43]  M. Finn,et al.  Stay Rates of Foreign Doctorate Recipients from U.S. Universities, 2007 , 2010 .

[44]  Klaus Nowotny,et al.  Career Choices in Academia , 2013 .

[45]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  The mover’s advantage: The superior performance of migrant scientists , 2014 .

[46]  D. Poston,et al.  Chinese Student and Labor Migration to the United States: Trends and Policies since the 1980s , 2007 .