Outcome after 52 Salto Ankle Prostheses Implanted by a Single Surgeon

While ankle arthrodesis was traditionally the gold standard method of treatment for disabling end-stage ankle arthritis, total ankle replacement (TAR) has been an acceptable alternative. The satisfaction rate of patients with TAR however differs. The purpose of our study is to investigate whether implant survival and results with special emphasis on the satisfaction rate of patients treated with a TAR implanted by a single surgeon were comparable to the literature. This was a retrospective cohort study in a teaching hospital. Data was collected from 52 patients who received a total ankle replacement (TAR) between 05/2002 and 06/2014. The mean follow-up time was 4.2 years (95% CI 3.3 – 5.0). Results showed a high satisfaction rate of 94% and 94% survival of the TAR after 5 years. We conclude that TAR with the Salto prosthesis is, in our hands, a reliable solution for end-stage ankle arthritis, with results comparable to the literature.

[1]  E. Tan,et al.  Identifying the learning curve for total ankle replacement using a mobile bearing prosthesis. , 2017, Foot and ankle surgery : official journal of the European Society of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.

[2]  S. Tenenbaum,et al.  Functional and clinical outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty in elderly compared to younger patients. , 2017, Foot and ankle surgery : official journal of the European Society of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.

[3]  Joel G Morash,et al.  Ankle Arthrodesis Versus Total Ankle Arthroplasty. , 2017, Foot and ankle clinics.

[4]  H. Koivu,et al.  Long-term Results of Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement , 2017, Foot & ankle international.

[5]  S. Raikin,et al.  Midterm Outcome of the Agility Total Ankle Arthroplasty , 2017, Foot & ankle international.

[6]  R. Queen,et al.  Correlation of Physical Performance and Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Total Ankle Arthroplasty , 2017, Foot & ankle international.

[7]  J. Louwerens,et al.  Long-term Functional and Radiographic Outcome of a Mobile Bearing Ankle Prosthesis , 2016, Foot & ankle international.

[8]  D. Beaton,et al.  Symptom Resolution and Patient-Perceived Recovery Following Ankle Arthroplasty and Arthrodesis , 2016, Foot & ankle international.

[9]  J. Nunley,et al.  Effect of Age on Outcomes in Total Ankle Arthroplasty , 2015, Foot & ankle international.

[10]  J. Louwerens,et al.  Comparison of the Short-Term Results of the First and Last 50 Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacements , 2014, Foot & ankle international.

[11]  J. Houck,et al.  Ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis: gait analysis compared with normal controls. , 2013, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[12]  H. Doets,et al.  Long-term follow-up of mobile-bearing total ankle replacement in patients with inflammatory joint disease. , 2013, The bone & joint journal.

[13]  K. Gurusamy,et al.  The outcome of total ankle replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2013, The bone & joint journal.

[14]  J. Nilsson,et al.  10-year survival of total ankle arthroplasties , 2011, Acta orthopaedica.

[15]  M. John,et al.  Prospective Study of a Cementless, Mobile-Bearing, Third Generation Total Ankle Prosthesis , 2011, Foot & ankle international.

[16]  M. Agreiter,et al.  Revision Rates after Total Ankle Arthroplasty in Sample-Based Clinical Studies and National Registries , 2011, Foot & ankle international.

[17]  R. Mann,et al.  STAR™ Ankle: Long-Term Results , 2011, Foot & ankle international.

[18]  M. Bonnin,et al.  The Salto Total Ankle Arthroplasty: Survivorship and Analysis of Failures at 7 to 11 years , 2011, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[19]  J. Reuver,et al.  Total Ankle Replacement Outcome in Low Volume Centers: Short-Term Followup , 2010, Foot & ankle international.

[20]  B. Nigg,et al.  Clinical Relevance of Hindfoot Alignment View in Total Ankle Replacement , 2010, Foot & ankle international.

[21]  J. Snedeker,et al.  Misalignment of total ankle components can induce high joint contact pressures. , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[22]  C. Saltzman,et al.  Treatment of Isolated Ankle Osteoarthritis with Arthrodesis or the Total Ankle Replacement: A Comparison of Early Outcomes , 2010, Clinics in orthopedic surgery.

[23]  A. Eskelinen,et al.  Total ankle replacement: a population-based study of 515 cases from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register , 2010, Acta orthopaedica.

[24]  J. Besse,et al.  Clinical Evaluation and Radiographic Assessment of Bone Lysis of the AES Total Ankle Replacement , 2009, Foot & ankle international.

[25]  Å. Carlsson,et al.  The Swedish Ankle Arthroplasty Register: An analysis of 531 arthroplasties between 1993 and 2005 , 2007, Acta orthopaedica.

[26]  Beat Hintermann,et al.  Scandinavian total ankle replacement: a 3.7-year average followup of 65 patients. , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[27]  Sigvard T Hansen,et al.  Complications and failure after total ankle arthroplasty. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[28]  R. Mann,et al.  Perioperative Complication Rate of Total Ankle Replacement is Reduced by Surgeon Experience , 2004, Foot & ankle international.

[29]  M. Post,et al.  The foot function index with verbal rating scales (FFI-5pt): A clinimetric evaluation and comparison with the original FFI. , 2002, The Journal of rheumatology.

[30]  C L Saltzman,et al.  Long-Term Results Following Ankle Arthrodesis for Post-Traumatic Arthritis , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[31]  H. Kofoed,et al.  Ankle Arthroplasty in Patients Younger and Older than 50 Years: A Prospective Series with Long-term Follow-up , 1999, Foot & ankle international.

[32]  R. Mann,et al.  Arthrodesis of the Ankle: A Critical Analysis , 1998, Foot & ankle international.

[33]  J. Nunley,et al.  Clinical Rating Systems for the Ankle-Hindfoot, Midfoot, Hallux, and Lesser Toes , 1994, Foot & ankle international.

[34]  K. Roach,et al.  The Foot Function Index: a measure of foot pain and disability. , 1991, Journal of clinical epidemiology.