An Adaptive Home-Use Robotic Rehabilitation System for the Upper Body

Robotic rehabilitation systems have been developed to treat musculoskeletal conditions, but limited availability prevents most patients from using them. The objective of this paper was to create a home-use robotic rehabilitation system. Data were obtained in real time from a Microsoft KinectTM and a wireless surface electromyograph system. Results from the KinectTM sensor were compared to a standard motion capture system. A subject completed visual follow exercise tasks in a 3-D visual environment. Data from two training exercises were used to generate a neural network, which was then used to simulate the subject's individual performance. The subjects completed both the exercise task output from the neural network (custom), and the unmodified task (standard). In addition, a wearable arm robot prototype was built. Basic system identification was completed, and a control algorithm for the robot based on pressure control was designed and tested. The subjects had greater root-mean-square error for position and velocity variables during the custom exercise tasks. These results suggest that the custom task was difficult to complete, possibly because the neural network was unconstrained. Finally, the robot prototype was able to mimic changes in a subject's elbow angle in real time, demonstrating the feasibility of the robotic rehabilitation system.

[1]  Denis Mottet,et al.  Rehabilitation of arm function after stroke. Literature review. , 2009, Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine.

[2]  S. Brochard,et al.  What's new in new technologies for upper extremity rehabilitation? , 2010, Current opinion in neurology.

[3]  James R. Andrews,et al.  Rehabilitation of the Thrower's Elbow , 2003, Clinics in sports medicine.

[4]  J. Deutsch,et al.  Cochrane review: virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. , 2012, European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine.

[5]  Linda Denehy,et al.  Validity of the Microsoft Kinect for assessment of postural control. , 2012, Gait & posture.

[6]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2012 update: a report from the American Heart Association. , 2012, Circulation.

[7]  S. Hoermann,et al.  The national ambulatory medical care survey. , 1973, Medical care.

[8]  Francisco J. Badesa,et al.  Pneumatic robotic systems for upper limb rehabilitation , 2011, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[9]  R DRILLIS,et al.  BODY SEGMENT PARAMETERS; A SURVEY OF MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES. , 1964, Artificial limbs.

[10]  P. Neilson Speed of response or bandwidth of voluntary system controlling elbow position in intact man , 1972, Medical and biological engineering.

[11]  Alon Wolf,et al.  Adaptive rehabilitation games. , 2013, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[12]  B. Brewer,et al.  Poststroke Upper Extremity Rehabilitation: A Review of Robotic Systems and Clinical Results , 2007, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[13]  Thanassis Rikakis,et al.  Adaptive Mixed Reality Rehabilitation Improves Quality of Reaching Movements More Than Traditional Reaching Therapy Following Stroke , 2013, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[14]  Maureen K. Holden,et al.  Virtual Environments for Motor Rehabilitation: Review , 2005, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[15]  Alon Wolf,et al.  A fast implementation for EMG signal linear envelope computation. , 2011, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[16]  J. Bussmann,et al.  Validity and interobserver reliability of visual observation to assess partial weight-bearing. , 2009, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  Thanassis Rikakis,et al.  A low cost, adaptive mixed reality system for home-based stroke rehabilitation , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.