Independence and interaction: understanding seniors' privacy and awareness needs for aging in place

As America's baby boom population gets older, aging in place -- the idea that seniors can remain independent in a comfortable home environment while being monitored and receiving care from family and caregivers living elsewhere -- has received significant attention. Fostering a sense of independence while simultaneously enabling monitoring and frequent interaction can seem paradoxical, however. This raises questions of how we can design technologies that help seniors retain their independence and a sense of comfort, while still interacting with and being monitored regularly by others. We present results from an interview study of 30 seniors, caregivers and relatives in which we sought to understand how they managed their interactions, availability, privacy and independence. Results suggest that they rely on attributes of the physical environment, temporal structures such as routine conversations and activities, and technological mediation.

[1]  Elizabeth D. Mynatt,et al.  Digital family portraits: supporting peace of mind for extended family members , 2001, CHI.

[2]  Daniel J. Canary,et al.  Communication and Relational Maintenance , 1994 .

[3]  Elizabeth D. Mynatt,et al.  Increasing the opportunities for aging in place , 2000, CUU '00.

[4]  James Fogarty,et al.  Sensing from the basement: a feasibility study of unobtrusive and low-cost home activity recognition , 2006, UIST.

[5]  Michael Boyle,et al.  The language of privacy: Learning from video media space analysis and design , 2005, TCHI.

[6]  Scienze Politiche American Community Survey , 2011 .

[7]  Marjorie Skubic,et al.  Use of videophones for distant caregiving: an enriching experience for families and residents in long-term care. , 2008, Journal of gerontological nursing.

[8]  M. Rantz,et al.  Aging in place: a new model for long-term care. , 2000, Nursing administration quarterly.

[9]  S. Duck,et al.  Steady as (s)he goes: Relational maintenance as a shared meaning system. , 1994 .

[10]  Peter Gregor,et al.  Design for older and disabled people – where do we go from here? , 2002, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[11]  J. Mintzer,et al.  Social Isolation and Social Support: An Applied Perspective , 1994 .

[12]  Alex Mihailidis,et al.  The use of computer vision in an intelligent environment to support aging-in-place, safety, and independence in the home , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[13]  Carman Neustaedter,et al.  Blur filtration fails to preserve privacy for home-based video conferencing , 2006, TCHI.

[14]  M. Skubic,et al.  Senior residents’ perceived need of and preferences for “smart home” sensor technologies , 2008, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[15]  Christopher G. Atkeson,et al.  Predicting human interruptibility with sensors , 2005, TCHI.

[16]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[17]  M. Pinquart,et al.  Influences on Loneliness in Older Adults: A Meta-Analysis , 2001 .

[18]  Anind K. Dey,et al.  From awareness to connectedness: the design and deployment of presence displays , 2006, CHI.

[19]  Wendy A. Kellogg,et al.  Social translucence: an approach to designing systems that support social processes , 2000, TCHI.

[20]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Portholes: supporting awareness in a distributed work group , 1992, CHI.

[21]  E. D. Ilsar,et al.  Remote monitoring of health status of the elderly at home. A multidisciplinary project on aging at the University of New South Wales. , 1995, International journal of bio-medical computing.

[22]  W. Rogers,et al.  The Use of Communication Technologies by Older Adults: Exploring the Benefits from the User's Perspective , 2001 .

[23]  Scott E. Hudson,et al.  Techniques for addressing fundamental privacy and disruption tradeoffs in awareness support systems , 1996, CSCW '96.

[24]  Sunny Consolvo,et al.  The CareNet Display: Lessons Learned from an In Home Evaluation of an Ambient Display , 2004, UbiComp.

[25]  A. Sixsmith,et al.  Monitoring the well-being of older people , 2005 .

[26]  John C. Tang Approaching and leave-taking: Negotiating contact in computer-mediated communication , 2007, TCHI.

[27]  Saul Greenberg,et al.  Supporting social worlds with the community bar , 2005, GROUP.

[28]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  Privacy in the open: how attention mediates awareness and privacy in open-plan offices , 2007, GROUP.

[29]  Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn,et al.  Connecting the family with awareness systems , 2007, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[30]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Controlling interruptions: awareness displays and social motivation for coordination , 2004, CSCW.

[31]  Carman Neustaedter,et al.  The calendar is crucial: Coordination and awareness through the family calendar , 2009, TCHI.

[32]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  Routines and Other Recurring Action Patterns of Organizations: Contemporary Research Issues , 1996 .

[33]  John C. Tang,et al.  Lilsys: Sensing Unavailability , 2004, CSCW.

[34]  Mark Perry,et al.  Multimodal and ubiquitous computing systems: supporting independent-living older users , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.