FATHOM: A neural network-based non-verbal human comprehension detection system for learning environments

This paper presents the application of FATHOM, a computerised non-verbal comprehension detection system, to distinguish participant comprehension levels in an interactive tutorial. FATHOM detects high and low levels of human comprehension by concurrently tracking multiple non-verbal behaviours using artificial neural networks. Presently, human comprehension is predominantly monitored from written and spoken language. Therefore, a large niche exists for exploring human comprehension detection from a non-verbal behavioral perspective using artificially intelligent computational models such as neural networks. In this paper, FATHOM was applied to a video-recorded exploratory study containing a learning task designed to elicit high and low comprehension states from the learner. The learning task comprised of watching a video on termites, suitable for the general public and an interview led question and answer session. This paper describes how FATHOM's comprehension classifier artificial neural network was trained and validated in comprehension detection using the standard backpropagation algorithm. The results show that high and low comprehension states can be detected from learner's non-verbal behavioural cues with testing classification accuracies above 76%.

[1]  N. Maccoby,et al.  Improving accuracy in interpreting non-verbal cues of comprehension†‡ , 1965 .

[2]  J. Ross Quinlan,et al.  C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning , 1992 .

[3]  Addie N Merians,et al.  The association between 5-HTTLPR and spontaneous facial mimicry: An investigation using the Facial Action Coding System (FACS) , 2015 .

[4]  M. Knapp,et al.  Nonverbal communication in human interaction , 1972 .

[5]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  Automatically Detected Nonverbal Behavior Predicts Creativity in Collaborating Dyads , 2014 .

[6]  C. Dollaghan,et al.  A comprehension monitoring program for language-impaired children. , 1986, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[7]  M. Stone Cross‐Validatory Choice and Assessment of Statistical Predictions , 1976 .

[8]  V. L. Allen,et al.  Encoding of nonverbal behavior by high-achieving and low-achieving children. , 1978, Journal of educational psychology.

[9]  David McLean,et al.  Charting the behavioural state of a person using a backpropagation neural network , 2006, Neural Computing and Applications.

[10]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning internal representations by error propagation , 1986 .

[11]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[12]  J. M. Webb,et al.  Influence of Pedagogical Expertise and Feedback on Assessing Student Comprehension From Nonverbal Behavior , 1997 .

[13]  Sandra Kaeko Machida,et al.  Teacher accuracy in decoding nonverbal indicants of comprehension and noncomprehension in Anglo- and Mexican-American children , 1982 .

[14]  Laura S. Pardo What Every Teacher Needs to Know About Comprehension , 2004 .

[15]  J. Ross Quinlan,et al.  Induction of Decision Trees , 1986, Machine Learning.

[16]  K. Scherer,et al.  The Body Action and Posture Coding System (BAP): Development and Reliability , 2012 .

[17]  Rosanna Lauriola,et al.  Are you kidding me , 2010 .

[18]  E. Skarakis-Doyle,et al.  Nonverbal indicants of comprehension monitoring in language-disordered children. , 1990, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[19]  Zuhair Bandar,et al.  Measuring human comprehension from nonverbal behaviour using Artificial Neural Networks , 2012, The 2012 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN).

[20]  C. Patterson,et al.  Nonverbal indicants of comprehension and noncomprehension in children. , 1980 .

[21]  David McLean,et al.  Silent talker: a new computer-based system for the analysis of facial cues to deception , 2006 .

[22]  Kathy Pezdek,et al.  Comprehension: It's Even More Complex than We Thought , 1986 .

[23]  Joann M. Montepare,et al.  Nonverbal Behavior in the Digital Age: Meanings, Models, and Methods , 2014 .

[24]  Valerie Manusov,et al.  “Are You Kidding Me?”: The Role of Nonverbal Cues in the Verbal Accounting Process , 2002 .

[25]  P. Ekman,et al.  The Repertoire of Nonverbal Behavior: Categories, Origins, Usage, and Coding , 1969 .

[26]  Elisha Y. Babad,et al.  Teaching and Nonverbal Behavior in the Classroom , 2009 .

[27]  Emiel Krahmer,et al.  Using non-verbal cues to (automatically) assess children's performance difficulties with arithmetic problems , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[28]  Laurene V. Fausett,et al.  Fundamentals Of Neural Networks , 1993 .

[29]  M.H. Hassoun,et al.  Fundamentals of Artificial Neural Networks , 1996, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[30]  A. Rogier [Communication without words]. , 1971, Tijdschrift voor ziekenverpleging.

[31]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning representations by back-propagating errors , 1986, Nature.

[32]  Timothy P. Mottet,et al.  Student Nonverbal Communication and Its Influence on Teachers and Teaching: A Review of Literature. , 2000 .