The SonicHand Protocol for Rehabilitation of Hand Motor Function: A Validation and Feasibility Study

Musical sonification therapy is a new technique that can reinforce conventional rehabilitation treatments by increasing therapy intensity and engagement through challenging and motivating exercises. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the feasibility and validity of the SonicHand protocol, a new training and assessment method for the rehabilitation of hand function. The study was conducted in 15 healthy individuals and 15 stroke patients. The feasibility of implementation of the training protocol was tested in stroke patients only, who practiced a series of exercises concurrently to music sequences produced by specific movements. The assessment protocol evaluated hand motor performance during pronation/supination, wrist horizontal flexion/extension, and hand grasp without sonification. From hand position data, 15 quantitative parameters were computed evaluating mean velocity, movement smoothness, and angular excursions of hand/fingers. We validated this assessment in terms of its ability to discriminate between patients and healthy subjects, test-retest reliability and concurrent validity with the upper limb section of the Fugl-Meyer scale (FM), the functional independence measure (FIM), and the Box and Block Test (BBT). All patients showed a good understanding of the assigned tasks and were able to correctly execute the proposed training protocol, confirming its feasibility. A moderate-to-excellent intraclass correlation coefficient was found in 8/15 computed parameters. The moderate-to-strong correlation was found between the measured parameters and the clinical scales. The SonicHand training protocol is feasible and the assessment protocol showed good to excellent between-group discrimination ability, reliability, and concurrent validity, thus enabling the implementation of new personalized and motivating training programs employing sonification for the rehabilitation of hand function.

[1]  J. Weir Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. , 2005, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[2]  Peter Wolf,et al.  Sonification and haptic feedback in addition to visual feedback enhances complex motor task learning , 2014, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  Michael H. Thaut,et al.  Rhythm, Music, and the Brain: Scientific Foundations and Clinical Applications , 2005 .

[4]  Tong Zhang,et al.  Leap Motion-based virtual reality training for improving motor functional recovery of upper limbs and neural reorganization in subacute stroke patients , 2017, Neural regeneration research.

[5]  Gert Kwakkel,et al.  Impact of Time on Improvement of Outcome After Stroke , 2006, Stroke.

[6]  T. Nyffeler,et al.  Usability of Videogame-Based Dexterity Training in the Early Rehabilitation Phase of Stroke Patients: A Pilot Study , 2017, Front. Neurol..

[7]  V. Mathiowetz,et al.  Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. , 1985, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[8]  Kui Wang,et al.  Fusion of Haptic and Gesture Sensors for Rehabilitation of Bimanual Coordination and Dexterous Manipulation , 2016, Sensors.

[9]  F. Fusco,et al.  Leap motion controlled videogame-based therapy for rehabilitation of elderly patients with subacute stroke: a feasibility pilot study , 2015, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[10]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. , 1987, Physical therapy.

[11]  R. Riener,et al.  Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review , 2012, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[12]  P. Dario,et al.  Design strategies to improve patient motivation during robot-aided rehabilitation , 2007, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[13]  J. F. Dyer,et al.  Advantages of melodic over rhythmic movement sonification in bimanual motor skill learning , 2017, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[15]  M Jason Highsmith,et al.  Functional performance differences between the Genium and C-Leg prosthetic knees and intact knees. , 2016, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[16]  G. Mead,et al.  Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke. , 2014, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[17]  V. Sanguineti,et al.  Robotic Assessment of Upper Limb Motor Function After Stroke , 2012, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[18]  Etienne Burdet,et al.  On the analysis of movement smoothness , 2015, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[19]  Daniel S. Scholz,et al.  Moving with music for stroke rehabilitation: a sonification feasibility study , 2015, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[20]  C. Granger,et al.  Relationships between impairment and physical disability as measured by the functional independence measure. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[21]  Peter Langhorne,et al.  Effects of Augmented Exercise Therapy Time After Stroke: A Meta-Analysis , 2004, Stroke.

[22]  A. Fugl-Meyer,et al.  Post-stroke hemiplegia assessment of physical properties. , 1980, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine. Supplement.

[23]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  What Is the Evidence for Physical Therapy Poststroke? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2014, PloS one.

[24]  H. Topka,et al.  Deficits of predictive grip force control during object manipulation in acute stroke , 2003, Journal of Neurology.

[25]  M. Levin,et al.  What Do Motor “Recovery” and “Compensation” Mean in Patients Following Stroke? , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[26]  Alessandra Mazzone,et al.  Test–Retest Reliability of Robotic Assessment Measures for the Evaluation of Upper Limb Recovery , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[27]  Plácido Rogério Pinheiro,et al.  Novel Virtual Environment for Alternative Treatment of Children with Cerebral Palsy , 2016, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[28]  Gerhard Rinkenauer,et al.  Evaluation of the Leap Motion Controller as a New Contact-Free Pointing Device , 2014, Sensors.

[29]  Ewa Niechwiej-Szwedo,et al.  Evaluation of the Leap Motion Controller during the performance of visually-guided upper limb movements , 2018, PloS one.

[30]  Pedro Miguel Moreira,et al.  A Serious Games Platform for Cognitive Rehabilitation with Preliminary Evaluation , 2016, Journal of Medical Systems.

[31]  Daniel S. Scholz,et al.  Sonification of Arm Movements in Stroke Rehabilitation – A Novel Approach in Neurologic Music Therapy , 2016, Front. Neurol..

[32]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[33]  Roberto Bresin,et al.  A Systematic Review of Mapping Strategies for the Sonification of Physical Quantities , 2013, PloS one.

[34]  Agnès Roby-Brami,et al.  Sensori-Motor Learning with Movement Sonification: Perspectives from Recent Interdisciplinary Studies , 2022 .

[35]  T. Platz,et al.  Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: a multicentre study , 2005, Clinical rehabilitation.

[36]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Predicting Activities after Stroke: What is Clinically Relevant? , 2013, International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society.

[37]  N Jeremy Hill,et al.  Validation of the Leap Motion Controller using markered motion capture technology. , 2016, Journal of biomechanics.

[38]  R. Nudo,et al.  Shaping plasticity to enhance recovery after injury. , 2011, Progress in brain research.

[39]  Terry K Koo,et al.  A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. , 2016, Journal Chiropractic Medicine.

[40]  Clark R Dickerson,et al.  Evaluation of a portable markerless finger position capture device: accuracy of the Leap Motion controller in healthy adults , 2015, Physiological measurement.

[41]  B. Volpe,et al.  Kinematic Robot-Based Evaluation Scales and Clinical Counterparts to Measure Upper Limb Motor Performance in Patients With Chronic Stroke , 2010, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[42]  A. Effenberg,et al.  Movement Sonification: Effects on Motor Learning beyond Rhythmic Adjustments , 2016, Front. Neurosci..

[43]  A. Timmermans,et al.  Influence of Task-Oriented Training Content on Skilled Arm-Hand Performance in Stroke: A Systematic Review , 2010, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[44]  A. Prevo,et al.  The long-term outcome of arm function after stroke: results of a follow-up study. , 1999, Disability and rehabilitation.

[45]  CONCURRENT VALIDITY OF THE CONTINUOUS SCALE-PHYSICAL FUNCTIONAL PEFORMANCE-10 (CS-PFP-10) TEST IN TRANSFEMORAL AMPUTEES. , 2016, Technology and innovation.