Does low-carbon pilot policy in China improve corporate profitability? The role of innovation and subsidy

[1]  Monirul Islam Pavel,et al.  The role of renewable energy use, technological innovation, and forest cover toward green development: Evidence from Indonesia , 2023, Innovation and Green Development.

[2]  Kennedy Machira,et al.  Modelling farmers’ adoption decisions of sustainable agricultural practices under varying agro-ecological conditions: A new perspective , 2023, Innovation and Green Development.

[3]  N. Wang,et al.  Study on the impact of business environment on private enterprises' technological innovation from the perspective of transaction cost , 2023, Innovation and Green Development.

[4]  S. K. Abanyie,et al.  Impact of improved water supply on livelihood and health: Emphasis on Doba and Nayagnia, Ghana , 2023, Innovation and Green Development.

[5]  Chun-ping Chang,et al.  Does corruption hurt green innovation? Yes – Global evidence from cross-validation , 2023, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[6]  Liuyang Yao,et al.  The impact of digital transformation on corporate financialization: The mediating effect of green technology innovation , 2023, Innovation and Green Development.

[7]  Zhenshan Li,et al.  Spatial distribution pattern and influencing factors of relative poverty in rural China , 2023, Innovation and Green Development.

[8]  M. Sharma,et al.  Drivers and motives for sustainable manufacturing system , 2023, Innovation and Green Development.

[9]  Chun-ping Chang,et al.  The transaction behavior of cryptocurrency and electricity consumption , 2023, Financial Innovation.

[10]  Cheng Hua,et al.  Multi-factor productivity growth with natural capital and undesirable output: A measurement for OECD and G20 countries , 2023, Innovation and Green Development.

[11]  A. Raihan,et al.  Toward sustainable and green development in Chile: Dynamic influences of carbon emission reduction variables , 2023, Innovation and Green Development.

[12]  Moon Moon Hussain,et al.  Towards sustainable development: The impact of transport infrastructure expenditure on the ecological footprint in India , 2023, Innovation and Green Development.

[13]  Chun-ping Chang,et al.  THE IMPACT OF MONETARY POLICY ON GREEN INNOVATION: GLOBAL EVIDENCE , 2022, Technological and Economic Development of Economy.

[14]  Haitao Wu,et al.  Planned economic growth and controlled energy demand: How do regional growth targets affect energy consumption in China? , 2022, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[15]  Chun-ping Chang,et al.  HOW DOES ECONOMIC POLICY UNCERTAINTY AFFECT GREEN INNOVATION? , 2022, Technological and Economic Development of Economy.

[16]  Q. Fu,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF INTERNATIONAL SANCTIONS ON GREEN INNOVATIONS , 2022, Technological and Economic Development of Economy.

[17]  Haitao Wu,et al.  The role of digitalization on green economic growth: Does industrial structure optimization and green innovation matter? , 2022, Journal of environmental management.

[18]  Chien‐Chiang Lee,et al.  The effects of low-carbon pilot policy on technological innovation: Evidence from prefecture-level data in China , 2022, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[19]  Chun-ping Chang,et al.  Strategies for the sustainable development of China in the post‐epidemic era , 2022, Sustainable Development.

[20]  Haitao Wu,et al.  Digitalization and sustainable development: How could digital economy development improve green innovation in China? , 2022, Business Strategy and the Environment.

[21]  Chun-ping Chang,et al.  The impact of extreme weather events on water quality: international evidence , 2022, Natural Hazards.

[22]  Chun-ping Chang,et al.  Does environmental, social, and governance performance move together with corporate green innovation in China? , 2022, Business Strategy and the Environment.

[23]  Hua Zhang,et al.  Going carbon-neutral in China: Does the low-carbon city pilot policy improve carbon emission efficiency? , 2022, Sustainable Production and Consumption.

[24]  Changqi Tao,et al.  Can digital transformation promote enterprise performance? —From the perspective of public policy and innovation , 2022, Journal of Innovation & Knowledge.

[25]  Feng Peng,et al.  The Effects of De-Capacity Policy on Steel and Coal Firms’ Profitability: Evidence from China’s Listed Companies , 2022, Energies.

[26]  Xunpeng Shi,et al.  Climate policy and low-carbon innovation: Evidence from low-carbon city pilots in China , 2022, Energy Economics.

[27]  Ying-Yueh Su,et al.  Revealing the effectiveness of green technological progress and financial innovation on green economic growth: the role of environmental regulation , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[28]  Chun-ping Chang,et al.  The influence of political ideology on greenhouse gas emissions , 2022, Global Environmental Change.

[29]  Fang Liu.  The impact of China’s low-carbon city pilot policy on carbon emissions: based on the multi-period DID model , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[30]  Yi Li,et al.  Boosting the green total factor energy efficiency in urban China: Does low-carbon city policy matter? , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[31]  Haitao Wu,et al.  Digitalization and environment governance: does internet development reduce environmental pollution? , 2022, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management.

[32]  Haitao Wu,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility and High-quality Development: Do Green Innovation, Environmental Investment and Corporate Governance Matter? , 2022, Emerging Markets Finance and Trade.

[33]  Chun-ping Chang,et al.  The impacts of energy insecurity on green innovation: A multi-country study , 2022, Economic Analysis and Policy.

[34]  Jun Li,et al.  Can low-carbon pilot policy improve atmospheric environmental performance in China? A quasi-natural experiment approach , 2022, Environmental Impact Assessment Review.

[35]  Zhisheng Hong,et al.  The Impact of Internet Use on Perception of the Poor–Rich Gap: Empirical Evidence from China , 2022 .

[36]  Kaifeng Wang,et al.  The Spatial Spillover Effect of Low-Carbon City Pilot Scheme on Green Efficiency in China's Cities: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment , 2022, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[37]  Chun-ping Chang,et al.  Can Central Bank Mitigate the Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Macroeconomy? , 2021, Emerging Markets Finance and Trade.

[38]  Junjun Fei,et al.  Government subsidies, enterprise operating efficiency, and “stiff but deathless” zombie firms , 2021, Economic Modelling.

[39]  Junhua Zhao,et al.  Electricity-consumption data reveals the economic impact and industry recovery during the pandemic , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[40]  Mingzhen Wang,et al.  Does environmental regulation promote enterprise profitability? Evidence from the implementation of China's newly revised Environmental Protection Law , 2021 .

[41]  Hao Chen,et al.  The impact of low-carbon city pilot policy on the total factor productivity of listed enterprises in China , 2021, Resources, Conservation and Recycling.

[42]  Weiteng Shen,et al.  Does the Low-Carbon City Pilot Policy Promote Green Technology Innovation? Based on Green Patent Data of Chinese A-Share Listed Companies , 2021, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[43]  Zhenhua Wang,et al.  Can Chinese Families Achieve a Low-Carbon Lifestyle? An Empirical Test of China’s Low-Carbon Pilot Policy , 2021, Frontiers in Energy Research.

[44]  Xiaodong Yang,et al.  Can the new energy demonstration city policy reduce environmental pollution? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China , 2021, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[45]  Yang Fu,et al.  Does the low-carbon city policy make a difference? Empirical evidence of the pilot scheme in China with DEA and PSM-DID , 2021 .

[46]  D. Larcker,et al.  How Much Should We Trust Staggered Difference-In-Differences Estimates? , 2021, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[47]  Shao-zhou Qi,et al.  The impact of a carbon trading pilot policy on the low-carbon international competitiveness of industry in China: An empirical analysis based on a DDD model , 2021 .

[48]  P. Pessarossi,et al.  Does high profitability improve stability for European banks? , 2020 .

[49]  J. Bai,et al.  Food-away-from-home plate waste in China: Preference for variety and quantity , 2020 .

[50]  Mengjie Li,et al.  Assessing the impact of environmental regulation on pollution abatement and collaborative emissions reduction: Micro-evidence from Chinese industrial enterprises , 2020 .

[51]  Wenying Chen,et al.  Modelling national, provincial and city-level low-carbon energy transformation pathways , 2020 .

[52]  Liyang Sun,et al.  Estimating Dynamic Treatment Effects in Event Studies With Heterogeneous Treatment Effects , 2018, Journal of Econometrics.

[53]  Pedro H. C. Sant'Anna,et al.  Difference-in-Differences with Multiple Time Periods , 2018, Journal of Econometrics.

[54]  Xavier d'Haultfoeuille,et al.  Two-Way Fixed Effects Estimators with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects , 2018, American Economic Review.

[55]  R. Xie,et al.  Can a low-carbon development path achieve win-win development: evidence from China’s low-carbon pilot policy , 2019, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.

[56]  Ranran Yang,et al.  The impacts of government R&D subsidies on green innovation: Evidence from Chinese energy-intensive firms , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[57]  Najul Laskar.  Does Sustainability Reporting Enhance Firms Profitability? A Study on Select Companies from India and South Korea , 2019, Indian Journal of Corporate Governance.

[58]  Boqiang Lin,et al.  Impact of energy saving and emission reduction policy on urban sustainable development: Empirical evidence from China , 2019, Applied Energy.

[59]  L. King,et al.  How to evaluate the effects of IMF conditionality , 2018, The Review of International Organizations.

[60]  Andrew Goodman-Bacon.  Difference-in-Differences with Variation in Treatment Timing , 2018, Journal of Econometrics.

[61]  Susan Athey,et al.  Design-Based Analysis in Difference-in-Differences Settings with Staggered Adoption , 2018, Journal of Econometrics.

[62]  F. Cucchiella,et al.  A profitability analysis of small-scale plants for biomethane injection into the gas grid , 2018 .

[63]  G. S. Milan,et al.  Pricing strategies and levels and their impact on corporate profitability , 2017 .

[64]  Aihua Wu.  The signal effect of Government R&D Subsidies in China: Does ownership matter? , 2017 .

[65]  B. Qin,et al.  Low-carbon city initiatives in China: A review from the policy paradigm perspective , 2016 .

[66]  Ye Qi,et al.  Developing low-carbon cities through pilots , 2015 .

[67]  P. V. Cauwenberge,et al.  Effects of local fiscal policy on firm profitability , 2014 .

[68]  Christopher Winship,et al.  Endogenous Selection Bias: The Problem of Conditioning on a Collider Variable. , 2014, Annual review of sociology.

[69]  Robert Novy-Marx,et al.  The other side of value: The gross profitability premium. , 2013 .

[70]  Chongwoo Choe,et al.  Corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: Evidence from Korea , 2010 .

[71]  Nazli Anum Mohd Ghazali.  Ownership structure, corporate governance and corporate performance in Malaysia , 2010 .

[72]  S. Roper,et al.  Innovation, ownership and profitability , 2009 .

[73]  Nicole Darnall,et al.  Understanding the Relationship between a Facility's Environmental and Financial Performance , 2007 .

[74]  Maria Laura Parisi,et al.  Productivity, innovation and R&D: Micro evidence for Italy , 2006 .

[75]  V. Vandenberghe,et al.  Evaluating the effectiveness of private education across countries: a comparison of methods , 2004 .

[76]  G. Jefferson,et al.  Returns to research and development in Chinese industry: Evidence from state-owned enterprises in Beijing , 2004 .

[77]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Capital structure and performance: Evidence from a transition economy on an aspect of corporate governance , 1999 .

[78]  M. Porter,et al.  Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship , 1995 .

[79]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Environmental regulation and profitability: An application to Swedish pulp and paper mills , 1995 .

[80]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.