An institutional approach to computational social creativity

Modelling the creativity that takes place in social settings presents a range of theoretical challenges. Mel Rhodes's classic "4Ps" of creativity, the "Person, Process, Product, and Press," offer an initial typology. Here, Rhodes's ideas are connected with Elinor Ostrom's work on the analysis of economic governance to generate several "creativity design principles." These principles frame a survey of the shared concepts that structure the contexts that support creative work. The concepts are connected to the idea of computational "tests" to foreground the relationship with standard computing practice, and to draw out specific recommendations for the further development of computational creativity culture.

[1]  Luciano Floridi,et al.  Semantic conceptions of information , 2005 .

[2]  D. Winnicott.  Playing and Reality , 1971 .

[3]  Daniel Davis Wood,et al.  ETHEREUM: A SECURE DECENTRALISED GENERALISED TRANSACTION LEDGER , 2014 .

[4]  Martin Wattenberg,et al.  Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences- 2007 Talk Before You Type: Coordination in Wikipedia , 2022 .

[5]  Marcelo Soares Pimenta,et al.  Ubimus Through the Lens of Creativity Theories , 2014, Ubiquitous Music.

[6]  Christina Freytag.  Being There Putting Brain Body And World Together Again , 2016 .

[7]  Michael S. Bernstein,et al.  Ensemble: exploring complementary strengths of leaders and crowds in creative collaboration , 2014, CSCW.

[8]  Odd Erik Gundersen.  The Role of Context and its Elements in Situation Assessment , 2014, Context in Computing.

[9]  B. J. Harrell.  The Question of the Commons: The Culture and Ecology of Communal Resources , 1989 .

[10]  Graeme Ritchie,et al.  Some Empirical Criteria for Attributing Creativity to a Computer Program , 2007, Minds and Machines.

[11]  András Kornai,et al.  Dynamics of Conflicts in Wikipedia , 2012, PloS one.

[12]  Simon Colton,et al.  Assessing Progress in Building Autonomously Creative Systems , 2014, ICCC.

[13]  Anna Jordanous,et al.  A Standardised Procedure for Evaluating Creative Systems: Computational Creativity Evaluation Based on What it is to be Creative , 2012, Cognitive Computation.

[14]  Simon Colton,et al.  You Can't Know my Mind: A Festival of Computational Creativity , 2014, ICCC.

[15]  Jay Ogilvy,et al.  The Emergence of Self , 2010 .

[16]  Francis Heylighen,et al.  Stigmergy as a Universal Coordination Mechanism : components , varieties and applications , 2014 .

[17]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Changing the World: A Framework for the Study of Creativity , 1994 .

[18]  Nick Barter,et al.  The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill , 2012 .

[19]  Pablo Gervás,et al.  Reading and Writing as a Creative Cycle: the Need for a Computational Model , 2014, ICCC.

[20]  Simon Colton,et al.  The Painting Fool: Stories from Building an Automated Painter , 2012 .

[21]  James M. Acheson,et al.  The Question of the Commons: The Culture and Ecology of Communal Resources , 1989 .

[22]  R. Jakobson.  Linguistics and poetics , 1960 .

[23]  Anna Jordanous,et al.  Four PPPPerspectives on computational creativity in theory and in practice , 2016, Connect. Sci..

[24]  E. Ostrom.  Institutional Analysis and Development : Elements of the Framework in Historical Perspective , 2011 .

[25]  Frederic Fol Leymarie,et al.  On Writing and Reading Artistic Computational Ecosystems , 2015, Artificial Life.

[26]  James C. McKim,et al.  Design by Contract, By Example , 2001, TOOLS.

[27]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  The Challenge of Common-Pool Resources , 2008 .

[28]  M. E. Conway.  HOW DO COMMITTEES INVENT , 1967 .

[29]  Andy Clark,et al.  Natural-Born Cyborgs? , 2001, Cognitive Technology.

[30]  Patrick Brézillon,et al.  Context in problem solving: a survey , 1999, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[31]  Simon Colton,et al.  The FloWr Framework: Automated Flowchart Construction, Optimisation and Alteration for Creative Systems , 2014, ICCC.

[32]  Graeme Kirkpatrick,et al.  The Philosophy of Simondon: Between technology and individuation , 2013 .

[33]  John C. Tinnell.  Grammatization: Bernard Stiegler's Theory of Writing and Technology , 2015 .

[34]  Rishab Ghosh.  Coase's Penguin, or, Linux and the Nature of the Firm , 2006 .

[35]  Graeme Hirst,et al.  Context as a Spurious Concept , 1997, ArXiv.

[36]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  The Future of the Commons - Beyond Market Failure and Government Regulation , 2012 .

[37]  Pirjo Friedrich,et al.  Massively distributed authorship of academic papers , 2012, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[38]  Ryan Safner.  Institutional Entrepreneurship, Wikipedia, and the Opportunity of the Commons , 2016 .

[39]  Douglas Rushkoff,et al.  Program or Be Programmed: Ten Commands for a Digital Age , 2010 .

[40]  Rob Saunders,et al.  Computational Social Creativity , 2015, Artificial Life.

[41]  T. Ingold.  The perception of the environment : essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill , 2000 .

[42]  Emily Ford,et al.  Defining and Characterizing Open Peer Review: A Review of the Literature , 2013 .

[43]  Simon Colton,et al.  Computational Creativity Theory: The FACE and IDEA Descriptive Models , 2011, ICCC.

[44]  E. Ostrom.  Understanding Institutional Diversity , 2005 .

[45]  J. Kagan,et al.  The emergence of self. , 1982, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[46]  John Fox,et al.  The Knowledge Engineering Review , 1984, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[47]  Gwen Arnold,et al.  A Review of Design Principles for Community-based Natural Resource Management , 2010 .

[48]  Yochai Benkler,et al.  Coase's Penguin, or Linux and the Nature of the Firm , 2001, ArXiv.

[49]  Paul Kockelman.  Biosemiosis, Technocognition, and Sociogenesis , 2011, Current Anthropology.