Institutional boundaries and trust of virtual teams in collaborative design: An experimental study in a virtual world environment

Members of virtual teams often collaborate within and across institutional boundaries. This research investigates the effects of boundary spanning conditions on the development of team trust and team satisfaction. Two hundred and eighty-two participants carried out a collaborative design task over several weeks in a virtual world, Second Life. Multigroup structural equation modeling was used to examine our research model, which compares individual level measurement between two boundary spanning team conditions. The results indicate that trusting beliefs have a positive impact on team trust, which in turn, influences team satisfaction. Further, we found that, compared to cross-boundary teams, within-boundary teams exhibited not only higher trusting beliefs and higher satisfaction with the collaboration process but also a stronger relationship between team trust and team satisfaction. These results suggest that trust and group theories need to be interpreted in light of institutional affiliation and contextual variables. An important practical implication is that trust can be fostered in a virtual world environment and collaboration on complex tasks can be carried out effectively in virtual worlds. However, within-boundary virtual teams are preferred over cross-boundary virtual teams if satisfaction with the collaboration process is of the highest priority.

[1]  Phyllis A. Anastasio,et al.  The Common Ingroup Identity Model: Recategorization and the Reduction of Intergroup Bias , 1993 .

[2]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[3]  AkoumianakisDemosthenes.  Ambient affiliates in virtual cross-organizational tourism alliances , 2014 .

[4]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Is Anybody Out There? Antecedents of Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Carl E. Larson,et al.  When Teams Work Best , 2002 .

[6]  Thomas Calvard.  Difficulties in Organizing Boundary Spanning Activities of Inter-Organizational Teams , 2013 .

[7]  D. Ferrin,et al.  Direct and indirect effects of third-party relationships on interpersonal trust. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[8]  Jessica Lipnack,et al.  Virtual Teams: Reaching Across Space, Time, and Organizations with Technology , 1997 .

[9]  J. Lewis,et al.  Trust as a Social Reality , 1985 .

[10]  Garry Robins,et al.  Cooperative and Competitive Structures of Trust Relations in Teams , 2014 .

[11]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Reducing intergroup bias: elements of intergroup cooperation. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  Michael H. Zack,et al.  Interactivity and Communication Mode Choice in Ongoing Management Groups , 1993, Inf. Syst. Res..

[13]  Anthony M. Townsend,et al.  Experience Richness: Effects of Training Method on Individual Technology Acceptance , 2013, 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[14]  J. Alberto Espinosa,et al.  Crossing Spatial and Temporal Boundaries in Globally Distributed Projects: A Relational Model of Coordination Delay , 2009, Inf. Syst. Res..

[15]  Emmanuelle Vaast,et al.  The Emergence of Boundary Spanning Competence in Practice: Implications for Implementation and Use of Information Systems , 2005, MIS Q..

[16]  Wynne W. Chin.  Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling by , 2009 .

[17]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Technology Adaptation: The Case of a Computer-Supported Inter-Organizational Virtual Team , 2000, MIS Q..

[18]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[19]  Susan A. Brown,et al.  Role-Based Experiences, Media Perceptions, and Knowledge Transfer Success in Virtual Dyads , 2006 .

[20]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[21]  P. Jarzabkowski.  Strategy as Practice: Recursiveness, Adaptation, and Practices-in-Use , 2004 .

[22]  R. MacCallum,et al.  Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. , 1996 .

[23]  W. Gamson.  Power and discontent , 1968 .

[24]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice , 2000, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[25]  Timothy R. Kayworth,et al.  The global virtual manager: a prescription for success , 2000 .

[26]  N. L. Chervany,et al.  Initial Trust Formation in New Organizational Relationships , 1998 .

[27]  Fiona Fui-Hoon Nah,et al.  Enhancing Brand Equity Through Flow and Telepresence: A Comparison of 2D and 3D Virtual Worlds , 2011, MIS Q..

[28]  S. Green,et al.  The effects of three social decision schemes on decision group process , 1980 .

[29]  David J. Pauleen,et al.  Relationship building and the use of ICT in boundary-crossing virtual teams: a facilitator's perspective , 2001, J. Inf. Technol..

[30]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Swift trust and temporary groups. , 1996 .

[31]  Dongsong Zhang,et al.  A Comparison of Deception Behavior in Dyad and Triadic Group Decision Making in Synchronous , 2006 .

[32]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Investigating the Moderators of the Group Support Systems Use with Meta-Analysis , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[33]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  WHY DO EMPLOYEES RESIST TEAMS? EXAMINING THE "RESISTANCE BARRIER" TO WORK TEAM EFFECTIVENESS , 2000 .

[34]  Carl E. Larson,et al.  Teamwork: What Must Go Right/What Can Go Wrong , 1989 .

[35]  Steve Sawyer,et al.  Effects of intra‐group conflict on packaged software development team performance , 2001, Inf. Syst. J..

[36]  N. Panteli,et al.  The role of subgroups in the communication patterns of global virtual teams , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[37]  Sandra Kiffin-Petersen,et al.  Trust: A Neglected Variable in Team Effectiveness Research , 2004 .

[38]  F. Nah,et al.  Enhancing%' or paper_id like 'brand equity through flow and telepresence: a comparison of 2D and 3D virtual worlds , 2011 .

[39]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[40]  M. Maznevski,et al.  Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness , 2000 .

[41]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Social categorization and intergroup behaviour , 1971 .

[42]  J. Alberto Espinosa,et al.  Team Boundary Issues Across Multiple Global Firms , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[43]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  The Spatial, Temporal, and Configurational Characteristics of Geographic Dispersion in Teams , 2007, MIS Q..

[44]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[45]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust , 1998 .

[46]  Susan R. Fussell,et al.  Multiple Group Coordination in Complex and Dynamic Task Environments: Interruptions, Coping Mechanisms, and Technology Recommendations , 2008, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[47]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  Dynamic nature of trust in virtual teams , 2002, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[48]  N. Luhmann.  Trust and Power , 1979 .

[49]  Richard G. Netemeyer,et al.  Handbook of Marketing Scales: Multi-Item Measures for Marketing and Consumer Behavior Research , 1993 .

[50]  M. Lindell,et al.  Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[51]  D. Denison,et al.  From Chimneys to Cross-Functional Teams: Developing and Validating a Diagnostic Model , 1996 .

[52]  J. Driscoll.  Trust and Participation in Organizational Decision Making as Predictors of Satisfaction , 2011 .

[53]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .

[54]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Communication Processes for Virtual Organizations , 2006 .

[55]  M. Hogg,et al.  Social Identity and Self-Categorization Processes in Organizational Contexts , 2000 .

[56]  Fiona Fui-Hoon Nah,et al.  Virtual World Affordances: Enhancing Brand Value , 1970 .

[57]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  Information Is What You Make of It: The Influence of Group History and Computer Support on Information Sharing, Decision Quality, and Member Perceptions , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[58]  Molly McLure Wasko,et al.  The Effects of Leader-Member Exchange on Member Performance in Virtual World Teams , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[59]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[60]  Sang-Gun Lee,et al.  I became an attractive person in the virtual world: Users' identification with virtual communities and avatars , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[61]  C. Handy.  Trust and the virtual organization , 1999 .

[62]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Technology adaption: the case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team 1 , 2000 .

[63]  Yuhyung Shin,et al.  A Person-Environment Fit Model for Virtual Organizations , 2004 .

[64]  Bart van den Hooff,et al.  Lost in space? Cognitive fit and cognitive load in 3D virtual environments , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[65]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Effects of Personalizaion and Familiarity on Trust and Adoption of Recommendation Agents , 2006, MIS Q..

[66]  Dan Voich.  Comparative Empirical Analysis of Cultural Values and Perceptions of Political Economy Issues , 1995 .

[67]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation , 1993 .

[68]  C. Hill.  Cooperation, Opportunism, and the Invisible Hand: Implications for Transaction Cost Theory , 1990 .

[69]  Erran Carmel,et al.  Global software teams: collaborating across borders and time zones , 1999 .

[70]  H. Chang,et al.  Determinants of cultural adaptation, communication quality, and trust in virtual teams' performance , 2011 .

[71]  Blake Ives,et al.  APC Forum: Business Implications of Virtual Worlds and Serious Gaming , 2008, MIS Q. Executive.

[72]  Sundeep Sahay,et al.  Managing cross-cultural issues in global software outsourcing , 2004, CACM.

[73]  J. S. Long,et al.  Testing Structural Equation Models , 1993 .

[74]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Does Trust Matter? Exploring the Effectsof Interorganizational and Interpersonaltrust on Performance , 1998 .

[75]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[76]  Thomas A. Finholt,et al.  Cultural challenges to leadership in cyberinfrastructure development , 2007 .

[77]  L. Cronbach.  Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[78]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  Radical Innovation Without Collocation: A Case Study at Boeing-Rocketdyne , 2001, MIS Q..

[79]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Network Structure in Virtual Organizations , 1999 .

[80]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[81]  Anthony Faiola,et al.  Correlating the effects of flow and telepresence in virtual worlds: Enhancing our understanding of user behavior in game-based learning , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[82]  Kannan Srikanth,et al.  Coordination in the Remote Delivery of Services , 2007 .

[83]  Demosthenes Akoumianakis,et al.  Ambient affiliates in virtual cross-organizational tourism alliances: A case study of collaborative new product development , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[84]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  Toward Contextualized Theories of Trust: The Role of Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[85]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Virtual Worlds: A Performative Perspective on Globally Distributed, Immersive Work , 2010 .

[86]  Katherine J. Stewart,et al.  The Impact of Ideology on Effectiveness in Open Source Software Development Teams , 2006, MIS Q..

[87]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  TEAMS EMBEDDED IN ORGANIZATIONS : SOME IMPLICATIONS , 1999 .

[88]  Fiona Fui-Hoon Nah,et al.  Impact of Flow and Brand Equity in 3D Virtual Worlds , 2010, J. Database Manag..

[89]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Lessons from a Dozen Years of Group Support Systems Research: A Discussion of Lab and Field Findings , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[90]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[91]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  The sinister attribution error: Paranoid cognition and collective distrust in organizations , 1994 .

[92]  Rikard Lindgren,et al.  Multi‐contextuality in boundary‐spanning practices , 2008, Inf. Syst. J..

[93]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Psychological Contract Violation in Online Marketplaces: Antecedents, Consequences, and Moderating Role , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[94]  Sung S. Kim,et al.  Out of Dedication or Constraint? A Dual Model of Post-Adoption Phenomena and its Empirical Test in the Context of Online Services , 2009, MIS Q..

[95]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Across cultural divides: The value of a superordinate identity. , 1999 .

[96]  Andy Luse,et al.  The changing nature of user attitudes toward virtual world technology: A longitudinal study , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[97]  T. Egerbladh,et al.  Group Problem Solving: Ability Level, Group Size, and Subsequent Individual Performance , 1981 .

[98]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  A Practical Guide To Factorial Validity Using PLS-Graph: Tutorial And Annotated Example , 2005, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[99]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  INTERCULTURAL INTERACTION IN DISTRIBUTED TEAMS: SALIENCE OF AND ADAPTATIONS TO CULTURAL DIFFERENCES. , 2007 .

[100]  Lesya M. Hassall,et al.  An Examination of a Theory of Embodied Social Presence in Virtual Worlds , 2011, Decis. Sci..

[101]  K. Dirks.  The effects of interpersonal trust on work group performance. , 1999, The Journal of applied psychology.

[102]  T. Ruddy,et al.  AN EXAMINATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN WORK GROUP CHARACTERISTICS AND PERFORMANCE: ONCE MORE INTO THE BREECH , 1997 .

[103]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  Distance Matters , 2000, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[104]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Principles for effective virtual teamwork , 2009, CACM.

[105]  F. Reid.  Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory , 1987 .

[106]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Hope or Hype: On the Viability of Escrow Services as Trusted Third Parties in Online Auction Environments , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[107]  Natalia Levina,et al.  Collaborating on Multi-Party Information Systems Development Projects: A Collective Reflection-in-Action View , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[108]  M. Hogg,et al.  A tale of two theories: A critical comparison of identity theory with social identity theory , 1995 .

[109]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An integrative model of organizational trust, Academy of Management Review, : . , 1995 .

[110]  Emmanuelle Vaast,et al.  Innovating or Doing as Told? Status Differences and Overlapping Boundaries in Offshore Collaboration , 2008, MIS Q..

[111]  H. Tajfel,et al.  An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. , 1979 .

[112]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Managing Client Dialogues During Information Systems Design to Facilitate Client Learning , 2005, MIS Q..

[113]  D. L. Gladstein.  Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. , 1984 .

[114]  Alexander Hars,et al.  Web Based Knowledge Infrastructures for the Sciences: An Adaptive Document , 2000, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[115]  Jone L. Pearce,et al.  Person-based reward systems: A theory of organizational reward practices in reform-communist organizations , 1994 .

[116]  Dennis F. Galletta,et al.  When the Wait Isn't So Bad: The Interacting Effects of Website Delay, Familiarity, and Breadth , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[117]  D. Rousseau,et al.  Trends in organizational behavior , 2000 .

[118]  Chester A. Schriesheim,et al.  Exploring work unit context and leader–member exchange: a multi-level perspective , 2000 .

[119]  D. Ferrin,et al.  The Role of Trust in Organizational Settings , 2001 .

[120]  Narcyz Roztocki,et al.  A motivational model for technology-supported cross-organizational and cross-border collaboration , 2010, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[121]  Robert M. Davison,et al.  Employee creativity formation: The roles of knowledge seeking, knowledge contributing and flow experience in Web 2.0 virtual communities , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[122]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  A general approach to representing multifaceted personality constructs: Application to state self‐esteem , 1994 .

[123]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue: Communication Processes for Virtual Organizations , 1999 .

[124]  Christophe Van den Bulte,et al.  The Effects of R&D Team Co-Location on Communication Patterns Among R&D, Marketing, and Manufacturing , 1998 .

[125]  Raghu Garud,et al.  Communication Patterns as Determinants of Organizational Identification in a Virtual Organization , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..