Event-related potentials and the phonological processing of words and non-words

Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded during a task which required subjects to discriminate between rhyming and non-rhyming visually presented pairs of letter strings, consisting of equal proportions of word-word and word-non-word combinations. Pair members were presented sequentially with an interstimulus interval of 1.56 sec. As in a previous study [Rugg, M. D., Brain Lang. In press], ERPs elicited by rhyming and non-rhyming words were differentiated by a late negative component (N450) in waveforms following the non-rhyming words. This effect was greatest over the midline and the right hemisphere. The same rhyme/non-rhyme difference was also observed, to an equal extent, in ERPs elicited by non-words. It is concluded that N450, presumed to be related to the "N400" component observed under conditions of semantic incongruity [Kutas, M. and Hillyard, S.A., Science 207, 203-205, 1980] does not seem to depend on linguistic processing at the semantic level for its modulation.

[1]  Janice Kay,et al.  One Process, Not Two, in Reading Aloud: Lexical Analogies Do the Work of Non-Lexical Rules , 1981 .

[2]  M. Kutas,et al.  Event-related brain potentials to semantically inappropriate and surprisingly large words , 1980, Biological Psychology.

[3]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Event-related potentials in phonological matching tasks , 1984, Brain and Language.

[4]  Gary L. Dannenbring,et al.  Semantic priming and the word repetition effect in a lexical decision task. , 1982 .

[5]  K. Stanovich,et al.  On priming by a sentence context. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[6]  J. H. Neely.  Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. , 1977 .

[7]  M. Coltheart.  Disorders of reading and their implications for models of normal reading. , 1981 .

[8]  M. Kutas,et al.  Electrophysiology of cognitive processing. , 1983, Annual review of psychology.

[9]  E Donchin,et al.  A metric for thought: a comparison of P300 latency and reaction time. , 1981, Science.

[10]  M. Hillinger,et al.  Priming effects with phonemically similar words: , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[11]  I. Fischler,et al.  Completion norms for 329 sentence contexts , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[12]  H G Vaughan,et al.  Event-related potential correlates of two stages of information processing in physical and semantic discrimination tasks. , 1983, Psychophysiology.

[13]  Salim Roukos,et al.  Brain potentials related to stages of sentence verification. , 1983, Psychophysiology.

[14]  M. Kutas,et al.  The lateral distribution of event-related potentials during sentence processing , 1982, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  K. Forster.  Priming and the Effects of Sentence and Lexical Contexts on Naming Time: Evidence for Autonomous Lexical Processing* , 1981 .

[16]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[17]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and cognitive control. , 1975 .