Sensitivity Analysis‐Based Automatic Parameter Calibration of the VIC Model for Streamflow Simulations Over China

Model parameter calibration is a fundamentally important stage that must be completed before applying a model to address practical problems. In this study, we describe an automatic calibration framework that combines sensitivity analysis (SA) and an adaptive surrogate modeling‐based optimization (ASMO) algorithm. We use this framework to calibrate catchment‐specific sensitive parameters for streamflow simulation in the variable infiltration capacity (VIC) model with a 0.25° spatial resolution over 10 major river basins of China from 1960 to 1979. We found that three parameters—the infiltration parameter (B) and two of the soil depth parameters (D1, D2)—are highly sensitive in most basins, while other parameter sensitivities are strongly related to the dynamic environment of the basin. Compared with directly calibrating the seven parameters recommended for the default calibration procedure, our framework not only reduced the computing time by two thirds through opting out of insensitive parameters (type I error) but also improved the Nash‐Sutcliffe model efficiency coefficient (NSE) for optimized results when it identified a missing sensitive parameter (type II error) in the case study river basins. Results show that the SA‐based ASMO framework is an effective and efficient model‐optimization technique for matching simulated streamflow with observations across China. The NSE for monthly streamflow ranged from 0.75 to 0.97 and from 0.71 to 0.97 during the validation and calibration periods, respectively. The calibrated parameters can be applied directly in streamflow simulations across China, and the proposed calibration framework holds important implications for relevant simulation studies in other regions.

[1]  Michel Verleysen,et al.  Using the Delta Test for Variable Selection , 2008, ESANN.

[2]  Q. Duan,et al.  A nonstationary bias‐correction technique to remove bias in GCM simulations , 2016 .

[3]  P. Reed,et al.  Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions Comparing Sensitivity Analysis Methods to Advance Lumped Watershed Model Identification and Evaluation , 2022 .

[4]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[5]  H. Chipman,et al.  BART: Bayesian Additive Regression Trees , 2008, 0806.3286.

[6]  Dennis P. Lettenmaier,et al.  How Essential is Hydrologic Model Calibration to Seasonal Streamflow Forecasting , 2008 .

[7]  Qiaohong Sun EXTREME RAINFALL ( R 20 MM , RX 5 DAY ) IN YANGTZE – HUAI , CHINA , IN JUNE – JULY 2016 : THE ROLE OF ENSO AND ANTHROPOGENIC CLIMATE CHANGE , 2017 .

[8]  R. Srinivasan,et al.  A global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multi-variable catchment models , 2006 .

[9]  Q. Tang,et al.  A Long-Term Land Surface Hydrologic Fluxes and States Dataset for China , 2014 .

[10]  Thomas A. McMahon,et al.  Physically based hydrologic modeling: 1. A terrain‐based model for investigative purposes , 1992 .

[11]  Q. Shao,et al.  Assessing the effects of adaptation measures on optimal water resources allocation under varied water availability conditions , 2018 .

[12]  T. Phillips,et al.  Bayesian estimation of local signal and noise in multimodel simulations of climate change , 2010 .

[13]  Katie Price,et al.  Tradeoffs among watershed model calibration targets for parameter estimation , 2012 .

[14]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines , 2011, TIST.

[15]  Wei Chu,et al.  Review of Parameterization and Parameter Estimation for Hydrologic Models , 2013 .

[16]  Ilya M. Sobol,et al.  Sensitivity Estimates for Nonlinear Mathematical Models , 1993 .

[17]  Dawen Yang,et al.  Evaluation of the Runoff and River Routing Schemes in the Community Land Model of the Yellow River Basin , 2017 .

[18]  R. H. Brooks,et al.  Hydraulic Properties of Porous Media and Their Relation to Drainage Design , 1964 .

[19]  Charles H. Luce,et al.  Macroscale hydrologic modeling of ecologically relevant flow metrics , 2010 .

[20]  D. Lettenmaier,et al.  A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation models , 1994 .

[21]  Wei Gong,et al.  A GUI platform for uncertainty quantification of complex dynamical models , 2016, Environ. Model. Softw..

[22]  Yanqing Lian,et al.  Climate change enhances the severity and variability of drought in the Pearl River Basin in South China in the 21st century , 2018 .

[23]  I. Sobol On the distribution of points in a cube and the approximate evaluation of integrals , 1967 .

[24]  P. Reed,et al.  Characterization of watershed model behavior across a hydroclimatic gradient , 2008 .

[25]  C. Miao,et al.  Temporal and spatial variations in water discharge and sediment load on the Loess Plateau, China: A high-density study. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[26]  P. Xie,et al.  Performance of high‐resolution satellite precipitation products over China , 2010 .

[27]  Thomas C. Pagano,et al.  Assessing water resources in China using PRECIS projections and a VIC model , 2011 .

[28]  G. Wang,et al.  Estimation of baseflow parameters of variable infiltration capacity model with soil and topography properties for predictions in ungauged basins , 2011 .

[29]  P. Ciais,et al.  The impacts of climate change on water resources and agriculture in China , 2010, Nature.

[30]  S. Running,et al.  Global evaluation of MTCLIM and related algorithms for forcing of ecological and hydrological models , 2013 .

[31]  J. C. Imhoff,et al.  Evaluation and Performance Assessment of Watershed Models , 2009 .

[32]  Wei Chu,et al.  A comprehensive evaluation of various sensitivity analysis methods: A case study with a hydrological model , 2014, Environ. Model. Softw..

[33]  R. Woods,et al.  Climate and landscape controls on water balance model complexity over changing timescales , 2002 .

[34]  C. Miao,et al.  Unraveling anthropogenic influence on the changing risk of heat waves in China , 2017 .

[35]  H. Wheater,et al.  Application of the Kineros2 rainfall-runoff model to an arid catchment in Oman , 2008 .

[36]  Chong-Yu Xu,et al.  Hydrological response to urbanization at different spatio-temporal scales simulated by coupling of CLUE-S and the SWAT model in the Yangtze River Delta region , 2013 .

[37]  F. Tao,et al.  Spatial–temporal changes in runoff and terrestrial ecosystem water retention under 1.5 and 2 °C warming scenarios across China , 2017, Earth System Dynamics.

[38]  S. Attinger,et al.  Multiscale parameter regionalization of a grid‐based hydrologic model at the mesoscale , 2010 .

[39]  Q. Duan,et al.  Parametric sensitivity analysis of precipitation and temperature based on multi-uncertainty quantification methods in the Weather Research and Forecasting model , 2017, Science China Earth Sciences.

[40]  N. Chien Changes in river regime after the construction of upstream reservoirs , 1985 .

[41]  Marc B Neumann,et al.  Comparison of sensitivity analysis methods for pollutant degradation modelling: a case study from drinking water treatment. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.

[42]  M. Trosset,et al.  Bayesian recursive parameter estimation for hydrologic models , 2001 .

[43]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Multi-objective global optimization for hydrologic models , 1998 .

[44]  P. Mujumdar,et al.  Partitioning uncertainty in streamflow projections under nonstationary model conditions , 2017 .

[45]  J. Friedman Multivariate adaptive regression splines , 1990 .

[46]  Xing-wei Chen,et al.  Improved calibration scheme of SWAT by separating wet and dry seasons , 2015 .

[47]  M. Clark,et al.  Towards simplification of hydrologic modeling: identification of dominant processes , 2016 .

[48]  Bart Nijssen,et al.  Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis of land surface parameters using the Variable Infiltration Capacity model , 2007 .

[49]  C. Wang,et al.  Automatic Model Calibration: A New Way to Improve Numerical Weather Forecasting , 2017 .

[50]  Ranga B. Myneni,et al.  Estimation of global leaf area index and absorbed par using radiative transfer models , 1997, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[51]  Seasonal streamflow forecasts for Europe – Part I: Hindcast verification with pseudo- and real observations , 2016, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences.

[52]  Dag Lohmann,et al.  A large‐scale horizontal routing model to be coupled to land surface parametrization schemes , 1996 .

[53]  M. Bierkens,et al.  Climate Change Will Affect the Asian Water Towers , 2010, Science.

[54]  Misgana K. Muleta,et al.  Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis coupled with automatic calibration for a distributed watershed model , 2005 .

[55]  GongWei,et al.  A comprehensive evaluation of various sensitivity analysis methods , 2014 .

[56]  Gaodi Xie,et al.  An Evaluation of China’s Water Footprint , 2011 .

[57]  F. Dominguez,et al.  How Might Recharge Change Under Projected Climate Change in the Western U.S.? , 2015, Geophysical research letters.

[58]  Chen Wang,et al.  Multiobjective adaptive surrogate modeling‐based optimization for parameter estimation of large, complex geophysical models , 2016 .

[59]  Wei Gong,et al.  An evaluation of adaptive surrogate modeling based optimization with two benchmark problems , 2014, Environ. Model. Softw..

[60]  Jun Du,et al.  Effects of climatic factors and human activities on runoff of the Weihe River in recent decades , 2012 .

[61]  Zhenghui Xie,et al.  Regional Parameter Estimation of the VIC Land Surface Model: Methodology and Application to River Basins in China , 2007 .

[62]  Carsten Peterson,et al.  Finding the Embedding Dimension and Variable Dependencies in Time Series , 1994, Neural Computation.

[63]  Jiongxin Xu,et al.  Underlying gravel layers in a large sand bed river and their influence on downstream-dam channel adjustment , 1996 .

[64]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  A Quantitative Model-Independent Method for Global Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output , 1999, Technometrics.

[65]  Wei Gong,et al.  Assessing parameter importance of the Common Land Model based on qualitative and quantitative sensitivity analysis , 2013 .

[66]  Q. Tang,et al.  The influence of groundwater representation on hydrological simulation and its assessment using satellite‐based water storage variation , 2019, Hydrological Processes.

[67]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall‐runoff models , 1992 .

[68]  Q. Duan,et al.  Parameter optimization for carbon and water fluxes in two global land surface models based on surrogate modelling , 2018 .

[69]  Zhongbo Yu,et al.  Parameter sensitivity analysis and optimization of Noah land surface model with field measurements from Huaihe River Basin, China , 2015, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment.

[70]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Status of Automatic Calibration for Hydrologic Models: Comparison with Multilevel Expert Calibration , 1999 .

[71]  R. Middleton,et al.  Global Sensitivity of Simulated Water Balance Indicators Under Future Climate Change in the Colorado Basin , 2018 .

[72]  Ran Zhai Spatial-temporal changes in river runoff and terrestrial ecosystem water retention under 1 . 5 °C and 2 °C warming scenarios across China , 2017 .

[73]  Bernard A. Engel,et al.  Daily streamflow modelling and assessment based on the curve‐number technique , 2002 .

[74]  J. Freidman,et al.  Multivariate adaptive regression splines , 1991 .

[75]  Zong-Liang Yang,et al.  Evaluating Enhanced Hydrological Representations in Noah LSM over Transition Zones: Implications for Model Development , 2009 .