3-D Self-Calibration for High-Precision Measurement Instruments With Hybrid Positions

Calibrating high-precision 3-D measuring instruments by using traditional calibration methods is challenging because these instruments require the use of higher-precision calibration artifacts. Self-calibration models can separate system errors from overall measurement errors by using auxiliary artifacts with accuracy within that of the object to be calibrated; therefore, such models have substantial advantages in terms of production costs and realization conditions. This article proposes a least-squares-based 3-D self-calibration model involving a hybrid position of the artifact. In this model, the calibration artifact is rotated or translated from its initial position to other positions and then used to execute measurements. Compared with existing 3-D self-calibration models, which require four positions, the proposed model involves three positions, including a hybrid position obtained through both rotation and translation. Thus, the proposed model requires fewer steps and a shorter processing time. Simulations were conducted to evaluate the 3-D self-calibration model, and the simulation results validated its ability to separate system errors from overall measurement errors generated by noise. An error propagation ratio of < 1 was also obtained for the model, indicating that the model can suppress noise. Experiments conducted using a computed tomography instrument confirmed the effectiveness and repeatability of this model; specifically, the standard deviation among the artifacts back to the initial position after the 3-D self-calibration process was less than that observed before the calibration process.

[1]  Wim Dewulf,et al.  Enhanced dimensional measurement by fast determination and compensation of geometrical misalignments of X-ray computed tomography instruments , 2018 .

[2]  Jun Ye,et al.  Exact algorithm self-calibration of two-dimensional precision metrology stages , 1999 .

[3]  Michael R. Raugh Two-dimensional stage self-calibration: Role of symmetry and invariant sets of points , 1997 .

[4]  Ming Zhang,et al.  A Holistic Self-Calibration Algorithm for $xy$ Precision Metrology Systems , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[5]  A. Kung,et al.  A Measuring Artefact for true 3D Machine Testing and Calibration , 2005 .

[6]  A. Balsamo,et al.  Results of the CIRP-Euromet Intercomparison of Ball Plate-Based Techniques for Determining CMM Parametric Errors , 1997 .

[7]  Hyug-Gyo Rhee,et al.  Absolute three-dimensional coordinate measurement by the two-point diffraction interferometry. , 2007, Optics express.

[8]  Peter Ekberg,et al.  High-precision lateral distortion measurement and correction in coherence scanning interferometry using an arbitrary surface. , 2017, Optics express.

[9]  William T. Estler,et al.  Dimensional artefacts to achieve metrological traceability in advanced manufacturing , 2020 .

[10]  Michael Raugh Self-Consistency and Transitivity in Self-Calibration Procedures , 1991 .

[11]  Xiaoyu Cai,et al.  Self-calibration for the 2D stage based on weighted least squares , 2019, Measurement Science and Technology.

[13]  Robert Schmitt,et al.  Computed tomography for dimensional metrology , 2011 .

[14]  Jong-Ahn Kim,et al.  On-Machine Self-calibration of a Two-Dimensional Stage Using an Absolute X–Y–Θ Position Sensor , 2020 .

[15]  Lei Wang,et al.  A flexible self-calibration method for large-stroke motion stage by using the multi-region stitching strategy based on least square algorithm , 2020 .

[16]  Ming Zhang,et al.  A Holistic Self-Calibration Approach for Determination of Three-Dimensional Stage Error , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[17]  Lars Mattsson,et al.  A new general approach for solving the self-calibration problem on large area 2D ultra-precision coordinate measurement machines , 2014 .

[18]  Zheng Chen,et al.  A transitive algorithm for self-calibration of two-dimensional ultra-precision stages , 2011, 2011 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM).

[19]  H Han Haitjema Iterative solution of least-squares problems applied to flatness and grid measurements , 1996 .

[20]  M. Raugh Absolute two-dimensional sub-micron metrology for electron beam lithography: A calibration theory with applications☆ , 1985 .

[21]  J.R.R. Mayer,et al.  A pseudo-3D ball lattice artifact and method for evaluating the metrological performance of structured-light 3D scanners , 2019, Optics and Lasers in Engineering.

[22]  Wim Dewulf,et al.  Software-based compensation of instrument misalignments for X-ray computed tomography dimensional metrology , 2018 .

[23]  Jinchun Hu,et al.  Accuracy- and Simplicity-Oriented Self-Calibration Approach for Two-Dimensional Precision Stages , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[24]  Wim Dewulf,et al.  Uncertainty determination and quantification for dimensional measurements with industrial computed tomography , 2013 .

[25]  Robert J. Hocken,et al.  Self-Calibration: Reversal, Redundancy, Error Separation, and ‘Absolute Testing’ , 1996 .

[26]  Quoc Cuong Dang,et al.  Complete 3-D self-calibration of coordinate measuring machines = 자가 보정을 이용한 3차원 측정기의 계통오차 계산 , 2006 .

[27]  Robert Schmitt,et al.  Geometric error measurement and compensation of machines : an update , 2008 .

[28]  Stefano Petrò A double shift self-calibration method for micro XY stages , 2019 .

[29]  L. Mattsson,et al.  Traceable X,Y self-calibration at single nm level of an optical microscope used for coherence scanning interferometry , 2018 .