Task Context and Frontal Lobe Activation in the Stroop Task

The ability to step outside a routine—to select a new response over a habitual one—is a cardinal function of the frontal lobes. A large body of neuroimaging work now exists pointing to increased activation within the anterior cingulate when stimuli evoke competing responses (incongruent trials) relative to when responses converge (congruent trials). However, lesion evidence that the ACC is necessary in this situation is inconsistent. We hypothesized that this may be a consequence of different task procedures (context) used in lesion and neuroimaging studies. The present study attempted to reconcile the lesion and the fMRI findings by having subjects perform clinical and experimental versions of the Stroop task during BOLD fMRI acquisition. We examined the relationship of brain activation patterns, specifically within the anterior cingulate and left dorsolateral frontal regions, to congruent and incongruent trial types in different task presentations or contexts. The results confirmed our hypothesis that ACC activity is relatively specific to unblocked–uncued incongruent Stroop conditions that have not been used in large neuropsychological studies. Moreover, the size of the behavioral Stroop interference effect was significantly correlated with activity in ACC and left dorsolateral regions, although in different directions. The current results are discussed in terms of previous proposals for the functional roles of these regions in activating, monitoring, and task setting, and the relation of these findings to the disparate reports in recent case series is considered.

[1]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Prefrontal and midline interactions mediating behavioural control , 2008, The European journal of neuroscience.

[2]  D. Stuss,et al.  Frontal injury: Impairments of fundamental processes lead to functional consequences , 2006, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[3]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. , 2001, Psychological review.

[4]  J. Cohen,et al.  Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. , 2000, Science.

[5]  Kevin N. Ochsner,et al.  For better or for worse: neural systems supporting the cognitive down- and up-regulation of negative emotion , 2004, NeuroImage.

[6]  R. Knight,et al.  Prefrontal–cingulate interactions in action monitoring , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  J. Ridley Studies of Interference in Serial Verbal Reactions , 2001 .

[8]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex shows fMRI response to internal and external error signals , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  Stephen M Kosslyn,et al.  Deficits in visual cognition and attention following bilateral anterior cingulotomy , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  J. Gläscher,et al.  Lesion mapping of cognitive control and value-based decision making in the prefrontal cortex , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  T. Braver,et al.  Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict: effects of response modality and processing domain. , 2001, Cerebral Cortex.

[12]  T. Shallice,et al.  A Multidisciplinary Approach to Anterior Attentional Functions a , 1995, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Anterior Cingulate Conflict Monitoring and Adjustments in Control , 2004, Science.

[14]  A. Vallesi Organisation of executive functions: Hemispheric asymmetries , 2012 .

[15]  Anthony Randal McIntosh,et al.  Partial least squares analysis of neuroimaging data: applications and advances , 2004, NeuroImage.

[16]  A. Turken,et al.  Dissociation between conflict detection and error monitoring in the human anterior cingulate cortex , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  T. Egner,et al.  Cognitive control mechanisms resolve conflict through cortical amplification of task-relevant information , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  C. Kennard,et al.  Human Medial Frontal Cortex Mediates Unconscious Inhibition of Voluntary Action , 2007, Neuron.

[19]  A. Turken,et al.  Response selection in the human anterior cingulate cortex , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  D. Stuss Science mirroring reality: an improbable journey into the functions of the frontal lobes. , 2013, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[21]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Neurobehavioral effects of prenatal alcohol: Part II. Partial least squares analysis. , 1989, Neurotoxicology and teratology.

[22]  Antonino Vallesi,et al.  FMRI evidence of a functional network setting the criteria for withholding a response , 2009, NeuroImage.

[23]  Eugene S. Edgington,et al.  Randomization Tests , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[24]  T. Shallice,et al.  Human cingulate cortex and autonomic control: converging neuroimaging and clinical evidence. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[25]  D. Stuss,et al.  The Trail Making Test: a study in focal lesion patients. , 2001, Psychological assessment.

[26]  G. Lohmann,et al.  Color-Word Matching Stroop Task: Separating Interference and Response Conflict , 2001, NeuroImage.

[27]  J. Pekar,et al.  fMRI evidence that the neural basis of response inhibition is task-dependent. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[28]  Geraint Rees,et al.  Self-control during response conflict by human supplementary eye field , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  Donald T Stuss,et al.  Functions of the Frontal Lobes: Relation to Executive Functions , 2011, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[30]  E. Darcy Burgund,et al.  Task demands modulate sustained and transient neural activity during visual-matching tasks , 2005, NeuroImage.

[31]  S. Graham,et al.  An fMRI study of the Trail Making Test , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  E. Donchin,et al.  Optimizing the use of information: strategic control of activation of responses. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[33]  Robert T. Knight,et al.  Effects of frontal lobe damage on interference effects in working memory , 2002, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[34]  T. Braver,et al.  Anterior Cingulate Cortex and Response Conflict : Effects of Response Modality and Processing Domain , 2022 .

[35]  Ian R. Summers,et al.  The Role of the Lateral Prefrontal Cortex and Anterior Cingulate in Stimulus-Response Association Reversals , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  H. Garavan,et al.  Dissociable Executive Functions in the Dynamic Control of Behavior: Inhibition, Error Detection, and Correction , 2002, NeuroImage.

[37]  Elisa Ciaramelli,et al.  The Regulation of Cognitive Control following Rostral Anterior Cingulate Cortex Lesion in Humans , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[38]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Role of the human anterior cingulate cortex in the control of oculomotor, manual, and speech responses: a positron emission tomography study. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[39]  Jordan Grafman,et al.  The role of prefrontal regions in the Stroop task , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[40]  H. Pashler,et al.  Puzzlingly High Correlations in fMRI Studies of Emotion, Personality, and Social Cognition 1 , 2009, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[41]  Antonino Vallesi,et al.  Sequential congruency effects: disentangling priming and conflict adaptation , 2011, Psychological Research.

[42]  Anthony Randal McIntosh,et al.  Towards a network theory of cognition , 2000, Neural Networks.

[43]  Donald T. Stuss,et al.  Inhibitory Control is Slowed in Patients with Right Superior Medial Frontal Damage , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[44]  R. Davidson,et al.  The integration of negative affect, pain and cognitive control in the cingulate cortex , 2011, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[45]  T. Paus Primate anterior cingulate cortex: Where motor control, drive and cognition interface , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[46]  J. V. Haxby,et al.  Spatial Pattern Analysis of Functional Brain Images Using Partial Least Squares , 1996, NeuroImage.

[47]  D. Stuss,et al.  Stroop performance in focal lesion patients: dissociation of processes and frontal lobe lesion location , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[48]  M. Torrens Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[49]  J L Lancaster,et al.  Automated Talairach Atlas labels for functional brain mapping , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[50]  P. Strick,et al.  Imaging the premotor areas , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[51]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  Bootstrap Methods for Standard Errors, Confidence Intervals, and Other Measures of Statistical Accuracy , 1986 .

[52]  T Shallice,et al.  Regional frontal injuries cause distinct impairments in cognitive control , 2007, Neurology.

[53]  G. Dong,et al.  Impaired inhibitory control in ‘internet addiction disorder’: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study , 2012, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[54]  Ivanei E. Bramati,et al.  The cerebral correlates of set-shifting: an fMRI study of the trail making test. , 2002, Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria.

[55]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[56]  J. Requin,et al.  The Effects of Irrelevant Stimuli: 1. The Time Course of Stimulus-Stimulus and Stimulus-Response Consistency Effects With Stroop-Like Stimuli, Simon-Like Tasks, and Their Factorial Combinations , 1999 .

[57]  E. Perret The left frontal lobe of man and the suppression of habitual responses in verbal categorical behaviour. , 1974, Neuropsychologia.

[58]  T. Shallice,et al.  The multiple dimensions of sustained attention , 2008, Cortex.

[59]  N. Cohen,et al.  The relative involvement of anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex in attentional control depends on nature of conflict. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[60]  T. Shallice,et al.  Effects of focal frontal lesions on response inhibition. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[61]  D. Meyer,et al.  A Neural System for Error Detection and Compensation , 1993 .

[62]  T. Egner Multiple conflict-driven control mechanisms in the human brain , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[63]  Shin Ah Kim,et al.  Effects of five daily high-frequency rTMS on Stroop task performance in aging individuals , 2012, Neuroscience Research.

[64]  Raymond J. Dolan,et al.  Anterior cingulate activity during error and autonomic response , 2005, NeuroImage.

[65]  Malcolm A Binns,et al.  Dissociations within the anterior attentional system: effects of task complexity and irrelevant information on reaction time speed and accuracy. , 2002, Neuropsychology.

[66]  D. V. Cramon,et al.  Subprocesses of Performance Monitoring: A Dissociation of Error Processing and Response Competition Revealed by Event-Related fMRI and ERPs , 2001, NeuroImage.

[67]  M. Farah,et al.  Is anterior cingulate cortex necessary for cognitive control? , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[68]  Jelena Jovanovic,et al.  Anterior cingulate cortex and the Stroop task: neuropsychological evidence for topographic specificity , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[69]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Parsing executive processes: strategic vs. evaluative functions of the anterior cingulate cortex. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[70]  T. Shallice,et al.  Multiple frontal systems controlling response speed , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[71]  A. R. McIntosh,et al.  Spatiotemporal analysis of event-related fMRI data using partial least squares , 2004, NeuroImage.

[72]  R W Cox,et al.  Software tools for analysis and visualization of fMRI data , 1997, NMR in biomedicine.