Long-term oncological outcome of reduced-port laparoscopic surgery (single-incision plus one port) as a technical option for rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to clarify the oncological safety of reduced-port laparoscopic surgery (single-incision plus one port) (RPS) for patients with rectal cancer. METHODS The clinicopathological data of 63 selected patients with clinical Stage I-III (T1-3 and N0-2) rectal cancer who underwent RPS of radical anterior resection between 2012 and 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The median distance of tumor from anal verge was 11 cm. Ordinarily, a multiport platform with three channels was placed in the 3-cm umbilical incision, and another 5- or 12-mm port was placed in the right lower abdomen. RESULTS The median operative time, amount of intraoperative bleeding, number of harvested lymph nodes, and length of distal margin were 272 min, 10 mL, 22 nodes, and 4.0 cm, respectively, and there was one (2%) patient with involvement of the radial margin. There were eight patients (13%) who required additional ports, and one patient (2%) who converted to open surgery. Intra- and postoperative complications occurred in one (2%) and 12 patients (19%), respectively. The median length of postoperative hospital stay was 8 days. The median follow-up period was 79 months, and incisional hernia was observed in 3 (5%) patients at the platform site not the port site, and cancer recurrence occurred in four patients (6%). The 5-year relapse-free and overall survival rates were 100% and 100% in the patients with pathological Stage I disease, 94% and 100% in the patients with pathological Stage II disease, and 83% and 89% in the patients with pathological Stage III disease, respectively. CONCLUSION RPS in the selected patients with rectal cancer, performed by an expert laparoscopic surgeon, may be technically safe and oncologically acceptable as well as multiport laparoscopic surgery.

[1]  T. Mizushima,et al.  Comparison of clinical outcomes of single-incision versus multi-port laparoscopic surgery for rectosigmoid or upper rectal cancer , 2022, International Journal of Colorectal Disease.

[2]  Qingbin Wu,et al.  Single-incision versus conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity-score matched studies , 2021, International Journal of Colorectal Disease.

[3]  R. Kawabata,et al.  Systematic review of single-port vs. multi-port surgery for rectal cancer. , 2020, Molecular and clinical oncology.

[4]  Y. Hirano,et al.  Long-term Oncologic Outcomes of Single-Incision Plus One-Port Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer , 2020, Indian Journal of Surgery.

[5]  D. Howard,et al.  Cosmetic Surgery-Use of 3mm Ports and Reduced-Port Techniques for Gynecologic Surgery. , 2019, Surgical technology international.

[6]  Mori Krinalkumar,et al.  Reduced Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: An Innovative, Cost-Effective Technique with Superior Cosmetic Outcomes. , 2019, Surgical technology international.

[7]  K. Tomaszewski,et al.  Is a drain necessary after anterior resection of the rectum? A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2019, International Journal of Colorectal Disease.

[8]  S. Kitano,et al.  Transitional impact of short‐ and long‐term outcomes of a randomized controlled trial to evaluate laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer from Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0404 , 2019, Annals of gastroenterological surgery.

[9]  J. A. Sánchez-Margallo,et al.  European association for endoscopic surgery (EAES) consensus statement on single-incision endoscopic surgery , 2019, Surgical Endoscopy.

[10]  Xin Liu,et al.  Systematic review of single-incision versus conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid colon and rectal cancer , 2018, World Journal of Surgical Oncology.

[11]  Qingchuan Zhao,et al.  Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Programs for Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis , 2018, World Journal of Surgery.

[12]  N. Kamiya,et al.  Short‐term and midterm outcomes of single‐incision laparoscopic surgery for right‐sided colon cancer , 2018, Asian journal of endoscopic surgery.

[13]  M. Gerken,et al.  Long-term oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic versus open rectal cancer resection: a high-quality population-based analysis in a Southern German district , 2018, Surgical endoscopy.

[14]  M. Beuran,et al.  Laparoscopic vs open complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation for colon cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2017, World journal of gastrointestinal oncology.

[15]  J. Schoones,et al.  Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus conventional laparoscopy for hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2017, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[16]  Y. Doki,et al.  Patient Body Image and Satisfaction with Surgical Wound Appearance After Reduced Port Surgery for Colorectal Diseases , 2016, World Journal of Surgery.

[17]  Chunliang Wang,et al.  The short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis , 2014, International Journal of Colorectal Disease.

[18]  Y. Kitagawa,et al.  Reduced‐port laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: Feasibility based on our early experience , 2013, Asian journal of endoscopic surgery.

[19]  W. Chambers,et al.  Single‐incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) in complex colorectal surgery: a technique offering potential and not just cosmesis , 2011, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[20]  Wan-Yu Lo,et al.  Single-incision laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical results , 2011, Surgical Endoscopy.

[21]  Ara Darzi,et al.  The role of single-incision laparoscopic surgery in abdominal and pelvic surgery: a systematic review , 2011, Surgical Endoscopy.

[22]  J. Cadeddu,et al.  Single-incision, umbilical laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes and short-term measures of convalescence. , 2009, European urology.

[23]  D. Sargent,et al.  Laparoscopically assisted vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis. , 2007, Archives of surgery.

[24]  M. Watanabe,et al.  Short- and midterm outcomes of laparoscopic surgery compared for 131 patients with rectal and rectosigmoid cancer , 2007, Surgical Endoscopy.

[25]  Marco Braga,et al.  Laparoscopic Versus Open Colorectal Surgery: A Randomized Trial on Short-Term Outcome , 2002, Annals of surgery.

[26]  Seiichiro Yamamoto,et al.  Prospective Evaluation of Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectosigmoidal and Rectal Carcinoma , 2002, Diseases of the colon and rectum.