Effective dam removal and river channel restoration approaches

Abstract Millions of dams have been built on the planet's rivers and streams to provide societal needs for freshwater supplies, irrigation, hydroelectric development, industrial activities and flood control. The structural and operational components of most dams include features that reflect technological advancements and changing societal priorities over time. Many dams were constructed and operated with no consideration for river ecology; some dams have included eco‐friendly features (e.g. fish passage facilities, instream flow releases); other dams were modified, replaced or removed. Dams have left their mark on the landscape and the biota that depend on rivers for their entire life cycle or for a part of it. Aquatic organisms (e.g. fish) are particularly sensitive to changes in habitat connectivity, hydrograph alterations, morphodynamic modifications, as well as hydrogeologic, thermal or chemical deviations from natural levels. As various societies around the globe, particularly in recent decades, place a higher priority on river ecosystem health and sustainability, effective approaches to deal with existing and new dams are emerging. Restoration of fluvial processes and ecological functions of rivers may take several forms, including dam replacement or removal. Simple removal of dams can result in sedimentation of downstream habitat, and channel adjustment within the former reservoir may be a long term process before a stable pattern, dimension, and profile becomes established. An alternative approach is to use natural channel design techniques to stabilize accumulated sediment and advance recovery towards a geomorphically stable and ecologically diverse stream. Two approaches and case examples are discussed, one removal with no channel restoration, and one removal with channel restoration. Approaches to dam removal and river restoration involve management, engineering and scientific challenges, demand balanced and sensible resolution, and lead to new research opportunities to fill knowledge gaps of the complex interactions between ecological and physical river processes.

[1]  A. Moehlman.  The Red River of the North , 1935 .

[2]  E. W. Lane.  Design of Stable Channels , 1955 .

[3]  H. B. N. Hynes,et al.  The Ecology of Running Waters , 1971 .

[4]  J. Stanford,et al.  The Ecology of Regulated Streams , 1979, Springer US.

[5]  D. J. Hall,et al.  Foraging Efficiency and Habitat Switching in Competiting Sunfishes , 1979 .

[6]  G. Mittelbach.  Foraging Efficiency and Body Size: A Study of Optimal Diet and Habitat Use by Bluegills , 1981 .

[7]  Ken D. Bovee,et al.  A guide to stream habitat analysis using the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology. IFIP No. 12 , 1982 .

[8]  I. Schlosser.  Flow regime, juvenile abundance, and the assemblage structure of stream fishes , 1985 .

[9]  G. A. McKinnon,et al.  Fish passage assessment of culverts constructed to simulate stream conditions on Liard River tributaries , 1985 .

[10]  N. C. Morgan,et al.  Impounded rivers, perspectives for ecological management , 1985 .

[11]  B. Statzner,et al.  Stream hydraulics as a major determinant of benthic invertebrate zonation patterns , 1986 .

[12]  Donald J. Orth,et al.  ECOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN THE DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION OF INSTREAM FLOW-HABITAT MODELS , 1987 .

[13]  I. Schlosser,et al.  Effects of Flow Regime and Cyprinid Predation on a Headwater Stream , 1989 .

[14]  J. B. Reynolds,et al.  Effects of spawning-run delay on spawning migration of Arctic grayling , 1989 .

[15]  Christos Katopodis.  Advancing the Art of Engineering Fishways for Upstream Migrants , 1990 .

[16]  Christos Katopodis,et al.  Introduction to Fishway Design , 1991 .

[17]  M. Winston,et al.  Upstream Extirpation of Four Minnow Species Due to Damming of a Prairie Stream , 1991 .

[18]  C. Katopodis,et al.  Assessment of Two Denil Fishways for Passage of Freshwater Species , 1991 .

[19]  Luther P. Aadland,et al.  Stream Habitat Types: Their Fish Assemblages and Relationship to Flow , 1993 .

[20]  Peter M. Steffler,et al.  Two-dimensional finite element flow modeling of physical fish habitat , 1994 .

[21]  Cheryl C Harrelson,et al.  Stream Channel Reference Sites: An Illustrated Guide to Field Technique , 1994 .

[22]  C. Nilsson,et al.  Fragmentation and Flow Regulation of River Systems in the Northern Third of the World , 1994, Science.

[23]  W. Dietrich,et al.  Downstream Ecological Effects of Dams: A geomorphic perspective , 1995 .

[24]  M. Leclerc,et al.  Two‐Dimensional Hydrodynamic Modeling: A Neglected Tool in the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology , 1995 .

[25]  C. Katopodis,et al.  Stream restoration for North American fish species , 1995 .

[26]  N. Auer.  Importance of habitat and migration to sturgeons with emphasis on lake sturgeon , 1996 .

[27]  Peter M. Steffler,et al.  TWO‐DIMENSIONAL HYDRAULIC SIMULATION OF PHYSICAL HABITAT CONDITIONS IN FLOWING STREAMS , 1996 .

[28]  R. Cunjak,et al.  Winter habitat of selected stream fishes and potential impacts from land-use activity , 1996 .

[29]  Joseph L. Ebersole,et al.  FORUM: Restoration of Stream Habitats in the Western United States: Restoration as Reexpression of Habitat Capacity , 1997, Environmental management.

[30]  J. Nelson,et al.  Changes in the Habitat and Fish Community of the Milwaukee River, Wisconsin, Following Removal of the Woolen Mills Dam , 1997 .

[31]  Xxyyzz,et al.  Channel Stability Assessment for Flood Control Projects , 1997 .

[32]  David P. Braun,et al.  How much water does a river need , 1997 .

[33]  R. Sparks,et al.  THE NATURAL FLOW REGIME. A PARADIGM FOR RIVER CONSERVATION AND RESTORATION , 1997 .

[34]  T. Lisle.  Applied River Morphology , 1998 .

[35]  Faye E. Hicks.  River ice jams , 1998 .

[36]  B. L. Lamb,et al.  Stream habitat analysis using the instream flow incremental methodology , 1998 .

[37]  T. Northcote,et al.  Migratory Behaviour of Fish and its Significance to Movement through Riverine Fish Passage Facilities , 1998 .

[38]  Brian Richter,et al.  A spatial assessment of hydrologic alteration within a river network , 1998 .

[39]  C. Frissell,et al.  Stream and Watershed Restoration , 1998 .

[40]  J. King,et al.  Instream flow assessments for regulated rivers in South Africa using the Building Block Methodology , 1998 .

[41]  W. Graf.  Dam nation: A geographic census of American dams and their large‐scale hydrologic impacts , 1999 .

[42]  A. Arthington,et al.  Discharge variability and the development of predictive models relating stream fish assemblage structure to habitat in northeastern Australia , 2000 .

[43]  S. Fisher.  River ecology and management: Lessons from the Pacific coastal ecoregion , 2000 .

[44]  Blaire V. Mossman.  BioScience American Institute of Biological Sciences , 2000 .

[45]  J. A. Kells,et al.  Nature-Like and Conventional Fishways: Alternative Concepts? , 2001 .

[46]  T. Prowse.  River-ice ecology. I : Hydrologic, geomorphic, and water-quality aspects , 2001 .

[47]  A. Bednarek.  Undamming Rivers: A Review of the Ecological Impacts of Dam Removal , 2001, Environmental management.

[48]  William L. Graf,et al.  Damage Control: Restoring the Physical Integrity of America’s Rivers , 2001 .

[49]  Terry D. Prowse,et al.  RIVER-ICE ECOLOGY. II: BIOLOGICAL ASPECTS , 2001 .

[50]  Martyn C. Lucas,et al.  Migration of Freshwater Fishes , 2001 .

[51]  G Marmulla,et al.  Dams, fish and fisheries: Opportunities, challenges and conflict resolution , 2001 .

[52]  Clair B. Stalnaker,et al.  Instream Flows for Riverine Resource Stewardship , 2002 .

[53]  D. Charles,et al.  Dam Removal: Challenges and Opportunities for Ecological Research and River Restoration , 2002 .

[54]  Kathleen D. White,et al.  Impacts of Dam Removal on Riverine Ice Regime , 2002 .

[55]  N. Poff,et al.  A Special Section on Dam Removal and River Restoration , 2002 .

[56]  Yves Souchon,et al.  Simple predictions of instream habitat model outputs for fish habitat guilds in large streams , 2002 .

[57]  N. Poff,et al.  How Dams Vary and Why It Matters for the Emerging Science of Dam Removal , 2002 .

[58]  Chris Katopodis,et al.  Case Studies of Instream Flow Modelling for Fish Habitat in Canadian Prairie Rivers , 2003 .

[59]  R. Tharme.  A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers , 2003 .

[60]  André Saint-Hilaire,et al.  State-of-the-Art and Perspectives of Habitat Modelling for Determining Conservation Flows , 2003 .

[61]  W. Tonn,et al.  Productive capacity of an artificial stream in the Canadian Arctic: assessing the effectiveness of fish habitat compensation , 2003 .

[62]  Thomas B. Hardy,et al.  Instream Flow Assessment Modelling: Combining Physical and Behavioural-Based Approaches , 2003 .

[63]  F. D. Shields,et al.  Design for Stream Restoration , 2003 .

[64]  C Katopodis,et al.  Hydraulic modelling of a nature-mimicking fishway design for the proposed Dunvegan hydroelectric project on the Peace River, northern Alberta, Canada , 2004 .

[65]  A. Pollard,et al.  Benthic invertebrate assemblage change following dam removal in a Wisconsin stream , 2004, Hydrobiologia.

[66]  P. Verdonschot,et al.  Testing the European stream typology of the Water Framework Directive for macroinvertebrates , 2004, Hydrobiologia.

[67]  Christos Katopodis,et al.  Developing a toolkit for fish passage, ecological flow management and fish habitat works , 2005 .

[68]  N. Rajaratnam,et al.  Structure of Flow Upstream of Vertical Angled Screens in Open Channels , 2005 .