A Typology of Collaboration Efforts in Environmental Management

Collaboration involves stakeholders and the public in a process of consensus building to address some of the most difficult environmental management problems facing society today. Collaborative groups vary widely, ranging from small watershed councils to regional ecosystem collaboratives to groups addressing large-scale policy issues. While these collaboratives all match the common principles of collaboration, a closer examination reveals many differences. Using institutional theories about levels of decision making provides a way of classifying collaboratives along a spectrum from action level to organizational level to policy level. This typology is applied to thirty-six collaboration case studies in Australia and the United States that were investigated over a series of years through interviews, observation, document analysis, and surveys. The application reveals different tendencies among the case types in terms of population, size, problem significance, institutional setting, and focus of activities. The typology also reveals functional differences in the types of stakeholders involved, the management arrangements for implementation, and the approaches to implementing change. This typology can help practitioners better understand the challenges and appropriate types of collaborations for different settings. It helps highlight differences in the role of government and decentralization of power. It distinguishes the different theoretical foundations for different types of collaboratives. Finally, it elucidates the different evaluation approaches for different types of collaboratives.

[1]  C. Ryan,et al.  Collaborative Partnership Design: The Implications of Organizational Affiliation for Watershed Partnerships , 2006 .

[2]  Richard D. Margerum,et al.  IMPLEMENTING INTEGRATED PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT , 1999 .

[3]  Mark T. Imperial Institutional Analysis and Ecosystem-Based Management: The Institutional Analysis and Development Framework , 1999, Environmental management.

[4]  Gail Bingham,et al.  Resolving Environmental Disputes: A Decade of Experience , 1986 .

[5]  Sherry R. Amstein “A Ladder of Citizen Participation” , 1969 .

[6]  Allan Curtis,et al.  SUSTAINING LOCAL WATERSHED INITIATIVES: LESSONS FROM LANDCARE AND WATERSHED COUNCILS 1 , 2002 .

[7]  Richard D. Margerum,et al.  A Co-ordination Diagnostic for Improving Integrated Environmental Management , 2000 .

[8]  Steve Selin,et al.  Developing a collaborative model for environmental planning and management , 1995 .

[9]  Edella Schlager,et al.  Policy making and collective action: Defining coalitions within the advocacy coalition framework , 1995 .

[10]  Nina Burkardt,et al.  Watershed Management and Organizational Dynamics: Nationwide Findings and Regional Variation , 2005, Environmental management.

[11]  T. Koontz,et al.  Research Note A Typology of Collaborative Watershed Groups: Citizen-Based, Agency-Based, and Mixed Partnerships , 2003 .

[12]  W. Rosenbaum,et al.  Environmental politics and policy , 1985 .

[13]  P. Sabatier Swimming upstream : collaborative approaches to watershed management , 2005 .

[14]  P. Sabatier,et al.  Policy Change And Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach , 1993 .

[15]  L. G. Smith,et al.  FORUM: The Converging Dynamics of Interest Representation in Resources Management , 1997, Environmental management.

[16]  D. Roush Making collaboration work : lessons from innovation in natural resource management , 2002 .

[17]  T. Colosi Negotiation in the Public and Private Sectors , 1983 .

[18]  Daniel A. Mazmanian,et al.  Implementation and public policy , 1983 .

[19]  N. Roberts,et al.  Stakeholder Collaboration and Innovation: A Study of Public Policy Initiation at the State Level , 1991 .

[20]  Michael McGuire,et al.  Collaborative Public Management , 2003 .

[21]  A. Campbell,et al.  Landcare: Communities shaping the land and the future , 1994 .

[22]  S. Mackenzie Integrated Resource Planning and Management: The Ecosystem Approach In The Great Lakes Basin , 1996 .

[23]  S. Arnstein,et al.  Ladder of Citizen Participation , 2020 .

[24]  Judith E. Innes,et al.  Consensus Building and Complex Adaptive Systems , 1999 .

[25]  H. Cortner,et al.  The Politics of Ecosystem Management , 1998 .

[26]  P. Sabatier,et al.  Short‐Term Versus Long‐Term Coalitions in the Policy Process: Automotive Pollution Control, 1963–1989 , 2004 .

[27]  Edward P. Weber Bringing Society Back In: Grassroots Ecosystem Management, Accountability, and Sustainable Communities , 2003 .

[28]  Barbara Gray,et al.  Collaborating: Finding Common Ground for Multiparty Problems , 1989 .

[29]  R. Margerum,et al.  Landowner motivations for watershed restoration: lessons from five watersheds , 2008 .

[30]  Richard F. Elmore,et al.  Backward Mapping: Implementation Research and Policy Decisions , 1979 .

[31]  Evert Vedung,et al.  Carrots, sticks & sermons : policy instruments & their evaluation , 1998 .

[32]  Myrna Mandell,et al.  THE IMPACT OF COLLABORATIVE EFFORTS , 1999 .

[33]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[34]  M. Bemelmans-videc Carrots, Sticks, and Sermons: Policy Instruments and Their Evaluation. , 1998 .

[35]  Ernest R. Alexander,et al.  How Organizations Act Together: Interorganizational Coordination in Theory and Practice , 1995 .

[36]  Douglas S. Kenney,et al.  Arguing About Consensus: Examining the Case Against Western Watershed Initiatives and Other Collaborative Groups Active in Natural Resources Management , 2000 .

[37]  M. Lane Participation, Decentralization, and Civil Society , 2003 .

[38]  J. Altman,et al.  Toward a stakeholder-based policy process: An application of the social marketing perspective to environmental policy development , 1994 .

[39]  Jay Sullivan,et al.  Public participation and appeals of forest service plans—An empirical examination , 1994 .

[40]  Thomas Bender,et al.  Community and social change in America , 1978 .

[41]  L. O'toole,et al.  Interorganizational Policy Implementation: A Theoretical Perspective , 1984 .

[42]  S. Daniels,et al.  Getting to 'We': Examining the Relationship between Geographic Scale and Ingroup Emergence in Collaborative Watershed Planning , 2005 .