When Hybrid Learning Meets Blended Teaching: Online Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC) Discourse and Classroom Face-to-Face (FTF) Discourse Analysis

This paper reports on a research project about the emerging hybrid or blended learning and teaching environments. These new environments result from the introduction of new technologies (e.g. `Blackboard' learning and teaching systems) into the educational setting. The new technologies, rendered as innovative tools in the education sector, have helped integrate the classroom and online learning environments into a variety of "productive spaces" referred to by researchers as "the third space" [1]. This research project has explored the major issues arising in this "third space" in a higher education institute in Hong Kong. These issues include 1) the relationship between the traditional knowledge transmission and the current technology-enhanced knowledge generation in education; 2) the changing relationship between the teachers and the students in the new learning and teaching environments; 3) the discourse nature of interactions through differing modes, e.g. face-to-face (FTF), and interactive electronic media. In addition, this project has also addressed, through a case study of two courses offered in the blended mode, the issues concerning the context and content of the two courses, and the opinions of the participants of these two courses towards the new learning and teaching mode.

[1]  Rebecca Hughes,et al.  Spoken English, TESOL and Applied Linguistics: Challenges for Theory and Practice , 2005 .

[2]  Alexander Seeshing Yeung,et al.  Does online language learning diminish interaction between student and teacher? , 2006 .

[3]  Boyd H. Davis,et al.  Electronic Discourse: Linguistic Individuals in Virtual Space , 1999 .

[4]  Janette R. Hill,et al.  Flexible Learning Environments: Leveraging the Affordances of Flexible Delivery and Flexible Learning , 2006 .

[5]  David Nunan,et al.  Collaborative language learning and teaching , 1995 .

[6]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  Network-Based Language Teaching: Concepts and Practice , 2000 .

[7]  Andrew Topper.  Comparing Face-to-Face and Electronic Discourse: Issues and Questions Raised in a Research Study. , 1997 .

[8]  Neil Mercer,et al.  English language teaching in its social context : a reader , 2001 .

[9]  Richard F. Schmid,et al.  Student perceived effectiveness of computer technology use in post-secondary classrooms , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[10]  Bruce E. Larson,et al.  Classroom Discussion and Threaded Electronic Discussion: Learning In Two Arenas , 2002 .

[11]  Zühal Okan,et al.  Edutainment: is learning at risk? , 2003, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[12]  Ming Ming Chiu,et al.  Building a culture of collaboration through hybrid language practices , 1999 .

[13]  Glenn Gordon Smith,et al.  Front-Stage and Back-Stage in Hybrid E-Learning Face-to-Face Courses , 2007 .

[14]  Anna-Brita Stenström,et al.  An Introduction To Spoken Interaction , 1994 .

[15]  John Pearson.  Investigating ICT using problem-based learning in face-to-face and online learning environments , 2006, Computers & Education.

[16]  R. Craig,et al.  PowerPoint Presentation Technology and the Dynamics of Teaching , 2006 .

[17]  Diana Laurillard,et al.  Rethinking University Teaching: A Framework for the Effective Use of Educational Technology , 1993 .

[18]  Charles Juwah.  Interactions in online education : implications for theory and practice , 2006 .

[19]  R. Calvo,et al.  Learning Through Discussions in Blended Environments , 2004 .

[20]  Thomas Skill,et al.  Embracing the hybrid model: Working at the intersections of virtual and physical learning spaces , 2002 .

[21]  Norbert Pachler,et al.  The challenge of new technologies: doing old things in a new way, or doing new things? , 1999 .

[22]  Kay Livingston,et al.  Blending online learning with traditional approaches: changing practices , 2007, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[23]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  NETWORK-BASED LANGUAGE , 2007 .

[24]  Curtis J. Bonk,et al.  The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs , 2005 .

[25]  Teresa K. Debacker,et al.  Extending the Traditional Classroom Through Online Discussion: The Role of Student Motivation , 2006 .

[26]  Margaret Coulthard,et al.  An introduction to discourse analysis , 1977 .

[27]  Marcy Reisetter,et al.  The Impact of Altered Realties: Implications of Online Delivery for Learners’ Interactions, Expectations, and Learning Skills , 2007 .

[28]  Diana Laurillard,et al.  Rethinking University Teaching: A Conversational Framework for the Effective Use of Learning Technologies. 2nd Edition , 1993 .

[29]  Michael McCarthy.  Discourse Analysis for Language Teachers , 1991 .

[30]  Peter Mortimore,et al.  Understanding Pedagogy: And Its Impact on Learning , 1999 .

[31]  Sasha A. Barab,et al.  Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning: Shared “We” and Shared “They” Indicators of Group Identity in Online Teacher Professional Development , 2004 .

[32]  David Nunan,et al.  Collaborative language learning and teaching , 1994 .

[33]  Geoffrey Leech,et al.  English Grammar for Today: A New Introduction , 1982 .

[34]  Rodney H. Jones,et al.  Interactional dynamics in on-line and face-to-face peer-tutoring sessions for second language writers , 2006 .

[35]  Rod Ellis,et al.  Task-based Language Learning and Teaching , 2003 .

[36]  Geoffrey Leech,et al.  English Grammar for Today , 1982 .

[37]  Steven Walsh,et al.  'Analyzing classroom discourse: a variable approach' , 2006 .