EXTENT AND LIMITS OF COVERT LEXICAL ACTIVATION IN LETTER-BY-LETTER READING.

The occurrence of implicit reading in brain-damaged patients with letter-by-letter dyslexia suggests a process of covert lexical activation, whereby lexical access occurs on the basis of parallel letter encoding. The extent and limitations of this process w ere studied by examining masked orthographic and phonological w ord priming as well as orthographic neighbourhood size effects in letter-by-letter reader IH. In Exp. 1, masked repetition priming occurred with primes displayed in a case-alternate format that were show n for 100 m sec (a duration that does not reliably support overt word identification in IH). Under sim ilar exposure conditions, however, prim es that are homophones to the target failed to affect performance, in contrast to neurologically intact observers (Exp. 2). Exp. 3 showed that IH's naming latencies are reduced for words with m any (vs. few) orthographic neighbours. This result suggests that overt word recognition in the patient is not strictly mediated by sequential letter recognition, but rather that it is conjointly affected by covert lexical activation. Relative to neurologically intact subjects, however, the pattern of the neighbourhood size effect shown by IH as a function of word frequency is abnormal and suggests that lexical activation based on the parallel processing of letters is w eakened in the patient compared to normal readers. Overall, results from IH point to a w eak form of activation of abstract orthographic lexical representations on the basis of parallel letter encoding, but no significant degree of phonological access. This account is discussed in relation to other similar proposals seeking an explanation of letter-by-letter dyslexia and of the covert lexical activation phenomena that accompany the disorder.

[1]  D. D. Wheeler Processes in word recognition , 1970 .

[2]  G. M. Reicher Perceptual recognition as a function of meaninfulness of stimulus material. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  E. Saffran,et al.  Reading without phonology: evidence from aphasia. , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  David B. Boles,et al.  An upper- and lowercase alphabetic similarity matrix, with derived generation similarity values , 1989 .

[5]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Form-specific visual priming in the right cerebral hemisphere. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[6]  D. Bub,et al.  Lexical Constraints on Reading Accuracy in Neglect Dyslexia , 1997 .

[7]  Single character processing in a case of pure alexia , 1995 .

[8]  R. Luce,et al.  The Choice Axiom after Twenty Years , 1977 .

[9]  Sally Andrews,et al.  Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy? , 1992 .

[10]  K. Seki,et al.  The efficacy of kinesthetic reading treatment for pure alexia , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  Marlene Behrmann Pure alexia: a nonspatial visual disorder affecting letter activation , 1995 .

[12]  C. J. Long,et al.  Remediation of alexia without agraphia: a case study. , 1995, Brain injury.

[13]  Jeffrey S. Bowers,et al.  A Characterisation of the Word Superiority Effect in a Case of Letter-by-letter Surface Alexia , 1996 .

[14]  H. Coslett,et al.  IMPLICIT VS. LETTER-BY-LETTER READING IN PURE ALEXIA: A TALE OF TWO SYSTEMS. , 1998, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[15]  Kenneth I. Forster,et al.  No enemies in the neighborhood: absence of inhibitory neighborhood effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  Michael C. Doyle,et al.  Effects of frequency on visual word recognition tasks: where are they? , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[17]  G W Humphreys,et al.  Contrasting Effects of Letter-spacing in Alexia: Further Evidence that Different Strategies Generate Word Length Effects in Reading , 1995, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[18]  D. Bub,et al.  Priming and response selection processes in letter classification and identification tasks. , 1995 .

[19]  D B Boles,et al.  Visual and phonetic codes and the process of generation in letter matching. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  J. Dejerine Sur un cas de cécité verbale avec agraphie suivi d’autopsie , 1891 .

[21]  M. S. Mayzner,et al.  Tables of single-letter and digram frequency counts for various word-length and letter-position combinations. , 1965 .

[22]  Patricia A. Reuter-Lorenz,et al.  A prelexical basis for letter-by-letter reading: A case study , 1990 .

[23]  Patricia A. Reuter-Lorenz,et al.  Modes of Lexical Access in the Callosotomized Brain , 1992, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  D N Levine,et al.  A study of the visual defect in verbal alexia-simultanagnosia. , 1978, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[25]  J. Hanley,et al.  Does letter-by-letter reading involve the spelling system? , 1992, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  E. Warrington,et al.  A disorder of simultaneous form perception. , 1962, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[27]  Roger W. Schvaneveldt,et al.  Frequency and pronounceability in visually presented naming and lexical decision tasks. , 1987 .

[28]  L. Buxbaum,et al.  Deep Dyslexic Phenomena in a Letter-by-Letter Reader , 1996, Brain and Language.

[29]  D. Bub,et al.  Pure Alexia: Attempted Rehabilitation and Its Implications for Interpretation of the Deficit , 1994, Brain and Language.

[30]  Martha J. Farah,et al.  Pure Alexia as a Visual Impairment: A Reconsideration , 1991 .

[31]  H. Coslett,et al.  Reading with the Right-Hemisphere: Evidence from Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 1994, Brain and Language.

[32]  J. Kay Simultaneous form perception and serial letter recognition in a case of letter-by letter reading , 2000 .

[33]  D. Boles Fast visual generation: Its nature and chronometrics , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  From letters to words: Procedures for word recognition in letter-by-letter reading , 1990, Brain and Language.

[35]  James C Johnston,et al.  A test of the Sophisticated Guessing Theory of word perception , 1978, Cognitive Psychology.

[36]  Stephen M. Kosslyn,et al.  Form-Specific Explicit and Implicit Memory in the Right Cerebral Hemisphere , 1994 .

[37]  H. Coslett Evidence for preserved reading in 'pure alexia' , 1995 .

[38]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Letter-by-letter reading? Functional deficits and compensatory strategies , 1992 .

[39]  Yasushi Hino,et al.  Neighborhood Size and Neighborhood Frequency Effects in Word Recognition , 1995 .

[40]  Mechanisms of implicit reading in alexia , 1994 .

[41]  C. L. Mallows,et al.  Individual Choice Behaviour. , 1961 .

[42]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Spatially Determined Deficits in Letter and Word Processing , 1991 .

[43]  K Patterson,et al.  Letter-by-letter reading: psychological descriptions of a neurological syndrome. , 1995, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[44]  L. Henderson Orthography and Word Recognition in Reading , 1982 .

[45]  Michael P. Alexander,et al.  Pictures, images, and pure alexia: A case study , 1984 .

[46]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The role of familiar units in perception of words and nonwords , 1977 .

[47]  Jeffrey S. Bowers,et al.  Fast and Specific Access to Orthographic Knowledge in a Case of Letter-by-letter Surface Alexia , 1996 .

[48]  Tatjana A. Nazir,et al.  PURE ALEXIA AND THE VIEWING POSITION EFFECT IN PRINTED WORDS. , 1998, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[49]  M. Behrmann,et al.  The evolution of pure alexia: A longitudinal study of recovery , 1990, Brain and Language.

[50]  A. Damasio,et al.  The anatomic basis of pure alexia , 1983, Neurology.

[51]  Karalyn Patterson,et al.  Letter-by-letter Reading: Psychological Descriptions of a Neurologial Syndrome , 1982 .

[52]  D. Bub,et al.  Visual Word Activation in Pure Alexia , 1995, Brain and Language.

[53]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Access to the internal lexicon , 1977 .

[54]  Tim Shallice,et al.  Lexical processing in the absence of explicit word identification: Evidence from a letter-by-letter reader , 1986 .

[55]  H B Coslett,et al.  Reading in pure alexia. The effect of strategy. , 1993, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[56]  Ronald Peereman,et al.  Neighborhood size effect in naming: Lexical activation or sublexical correspondences? , 1995 .

[57]  E. Warrington Word-form dyslexia , 1995 .

[58]  Jeffrey A. Hadley,et al.  Letter-by-letter surface alexia , 1992 .

[59]  M. Turvey,et al.  Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 2. Evidence from phonological priming by homophones and pseudohomophones. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[60]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Spelling-sound effects in reading: Time-course and decision criteria , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[61]  David Howard,et al.  Letter-by-letter readers: evidence for parallel processing , 1991 .

[62]  S. Andrews Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? , 1989 .