Estimates of Dietary Exposure to Bisphenol A (BPA) from Light Metal Packaging using Food Consumption and Packaging usage Data: A Refined Deterministic Approach and a Fully Probabilistic (FACET) Approach

The FACET tool is a probabilistic model to estimate exposure to chemicals in foodstuffs, originating from flavours, additives and food contact materials. This paper demonstrates the use of the FACET tool to estimate exposure to BPA (bisphenol A) from light metal packaging. For exposure to migrants from food packaging, FACET uses industry-supplied data on the occurrence of substances in the packaging, their concentrations and construction of the packaging, which were combined with data from a market research organisation and food consumption data supplied by national database managers. To illustrate the principles, UK packaging data were used together with consumption data from the UK National Diet and Nutrition Survey (NDNS) dietary survey for 19–64 year olds for a refined deterministic verification. The UK data were chosen mainly because the consumption surveys are detailed, data for UK packaging at a detailed level were available and, arguably, the UK population is composed of high consumers of packaged foodstuffs. Exposures were run for each food category that could give rise to BPA from light metal packaging. Consumer loyalty to a particular type of packaging, commonly referred to as packaging loyalty, was set. The BPA extraction levels used for the 15 types of coating chemistries that could release BPA were in the range of 0.00005–0.012 mg dm–2. The estimates of exposure to BPA using FACET for the total diet were 0.0098 (mean) and 0.0466 (97.5th percentile) mg/person/day, corresponding to 0.00013 (mean) and 0.00059 (97.5th percentile) mg kg–1 body weight day–1 for consumers of foods packed in light metal packaging. This is well below the current EFSA (and other recognised bodies) TDI of 0.05 mg kg–1 body weight day–1. These probabilistic estimates were compared with estimates using a refined deterministic approach drawing on the same input data. The results from FACET for the mean, 95th and 97.5th percentile exposures to BPA lay between the lowest and the highest estimates from the refined deterministic calculations. Since this should be the case, for a fully probabilistic compared with a deterministic approach, it is concluded that the FACET tool has been verified in this example. A recent EFSA draft opinion on exposure to BPA from different sources showed that canned foods were a major contributor and compared results from various models, including those from FACET. The results from FACET were overall conservative.

[1]  C. L. Walker.  The national diet. , 1984, British medical journal.

[2]  A. Goodson,et al.  Survey of bisphenol A and bisphenol F in canned foods , 2002, Food additives and contaminants.

[3]  P. Oldring,et al.  Estimates of per capita exposure to substances migrating from canned foods and beverages , 2002, Food additives and contaminants.

[4]  A. Hart,et al.  Dietary exposure to chemical migrants from food contact materials: A probabilistic approach , 2005, Food additives and contaminants.

[5]  F. Toldrá,et al.  Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Food Additives, Flavourings, Processing Aids and Materials in contact with Food (AFC) on a request from the Commission , 2005 .

[6]  A. Hart,et al.  Approach to stochastic modelling of consumer exposure for any substance from canned foods using simulant migration data , 2006, Food additives and contaminants.

[7]  A. Hart,et al.  Migrants from food cans revisited – application of a stochastic model for a more realistic assessment of exposure to bisphenol A diglycidyl ether (BADGE) , 2006 .

[8]  Laurence Castle,et al.  Exposure to Substances from Food Contact Materials and an Introduction to the FACET Project , 2009 .

[9]  P Northing,et al.  New hierarchical classification of food items for the assessment of exposure to packaging migrants: use of hub codes for different food groups , 2009, Food additives & contaminants. Part A, Chemistry, analysis, control, exposure & risk assessment.

[10]  Flavourings.  Scientific Opinion on Bisphenol A: evaluation of a study investigating its neurodevelopmental toxicity, review of recent scientific literature on its toxicity and advice on the Danish risk assessment of Bisphenol A , 2010 .

[11]  P K T Oldring,et al.  Development of a new modelling tool (FACET) to assess exposure to chemical migrants from food packaging , 2014, Food additives & contaminants. Part A, Chemistry, analysis, control, exposure & risk assessment.