Evidence of native starch degradation with human small intestinal maltase‐glucoamylase (recombinant)

Action of human small intestinal brush border carbohydrate digesting enzymes is thought to involve only final hydrolysis reactions of oligosaccharides to monosaccharides. In vitro starch digestibility assays use fungal amyloglucosidase to provide this function. In this study, recombinant N‐terminal subunit enzyme of human small intestinal maltase‐glucoamylase (rhMGAM‐N) was used to explore digestion of native starches from different botanical sources. The susceptibilities to enzyme hydrolysis varied among the starches. The rate and extent of hydrolysis of amylomaize‐5 and amylomaize‐7 into glucose were greater than for other starches. Such was not observed with fungal amyloglucosidase or pancreatic α‐amylase. The degradation of native starch granules showed a surface furrowed pattern in random, radial, or tree‐like arrangements that differed substantially from the erosion patterns of amyloglucosidase or α‐amylase. The evidence of raw starch granule degradation with rhMGAM‐N indicates that pancreatic α‐amylase hydrolysis is not a requirement for native starch digestion in the human small intestine.

[1]  S. Withers,et al.  Mechanistic and Structural Analysis of a Family 31 α-Glycosidase and Its Glycosyl-enzyme Intermediate* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[2]  H. Elzinga,et al.  Digestion of so-called resistant starch sources in the human small intestine. , 2000, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[3]  A. Kimura,et al.  REACTION OF ENZYMES WITH STARCH GRANULES : KINETICS AND PRODUCTS OF THE REACTION WITH GLUCOAMYLASE , 1995 .

[4]  Michael Somogyi,et al.  NOTES ON SUGAR DETERMINATION , 1926 .

[5]  B. Nichols,et al.  Human Small Intestinal Maltase-glucoamylase cDNA Cloning , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[6]  B. M. Pinto,et al.  Inhibition of recombinant human maltase glucoamylase by salacinol and derivatives , 2006, The FEBS journal.

[7]  D. Swallow,et al.  The maltase-glucoamylase gene: Common ancestry to sucrase-isomaltase with complementary starch digestion activities , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  J. R. Stark,et al.  A CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF PROCEDURES FOR THE ISOLATION OF BARLEY STARCH , 1988 .

[9]  H. Englyst,et al.  Classification and measurement of nutritionally important starch fractions. , 1992, European journal of clinical nutrition.

[10]  J. Robyt Essentials of carbohydrate chemistry , 1997 .

[11]  J. Jane,et al.  Branch-structure difference in starches of A- and B-type X-ray patterns revealed by their Naegeli dextrins☆ , 1997 .

[12]  J. Jane,et al.  Characterization and modeling of the A- and B-granule starches of wheat, triticale, and barley , 2007 .

[13]  G. Brayer,et al.  Luminal Substrate “Brake” on Mucosal Maltase-glucoamylase Activity Regulates Total Rate of Starch Digestion to Glucose , 2007, Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition.

[14]  R. Hoover,et al.  Studies on the Functional Characteristics and Digestibility of Starches from Phaseolus vulgaris Biotypes , 1985 .

[15]  M. Smogyi,et al.  Notes on sugar determination. , 1952, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[16]  D. French,et al.  The action pattern of porcine pancreatic alpha-amylase in relationship to the substrate binding site of the enzyme. , 1970, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[17]  D. Alpers,et al.  Properties of human intestinal glucoamylase. , 1973, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[18]  D. Gallant,et al.  Microscopy of starch : evidence of a new level of granule organization , 1997 .

[19]  B. M. Pinto,et al.  New chain-extended analogues of salacinol and blintol and their glycosidase inhibitory activities. Mapping the active-site requirements of human maltase glucoamylase. , 2007, The Journal of organic chemistry.