Longitudinal analysis of regional grey matter loss in Huntington disease: effects of the length of the expanded CAG repeat

Background: The mechanisms guiding the progression of neuronal damage in patients with Huntington disease (HD) are not completely understood. It is unclear whether the genotype—that is, the length of the expanded CAG repeat—guides the location and speed of grey matter decline once HD is clinically manifested. Moreover, the relationship between cortical and subcortical grey matter atrophy and the severity of motor symptoms of HD is controversial. Objectives: In this article, we longitudinally studied, over the period of 1 year, a cohort of 49 patients with HD. We investigated: first, the clinical relevance of regional progressive grey matter atrophy; and second, the relationship between the ratio of atrophy progression and genotype. Methods: The length of the expanded CAG repeat was quantified for all patients and the United Huntington’s Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) was used to rate the severity of clinical symptoms. Grey matter atrophy was determined using voxel-based morphometry (VBM) of brain MRI. Progression of atrophy was quantified in 37 patients who were submitted to two different MRI scans, the second scan 1 year later than the first. Results: Overall, patients exhibited progressive atrophy involving the caudate, pallidum, putamen, insula, cingulate cortex, cerebellum, orbitofrontal cortex, medial temporal lobes and middle frontal gyri. Patients with a larger UHDRS score exhibited selective atrophy of the caudate, thalamus, midbrain, insula and frontal lobes. Patients with longer, expanded CAG repeat sequences showed faster rates and more widespread atrophy, particularly those patients with more than 55 expanded CAG repeats. Conclusions: These results confirm that brain atrophy progresses after the clinical onset of HD and that regional atrophy is related to symptom severity. Moreover, our results also indicate that intensity and rate of progression of brain atrophy are more pronounced in patients with larger, expanded CAG repeat sequences.

[1]  Joseph B. Martin Huntington's disease , 1984, Neurology.

[2]  J. Brandt,et al.  The association of CAG repeat length with clinical progression in Huntington disease , 2006, Neurology.

[3]  J R Hodges,et al.  Profile of cognitive progression in early Huntington’s disease , 2003, Neurology.

[4]  ACMG/ASHG statement. Laboratory guidelines for Huntington disease genetic testing. The American College of Medical Genetics/American Society of Human Genetics Huntington Disease Genetic Testing Working Group. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[5]  D. Neary,et al.  Longitudinal evaluation of cognitive disorder in Huntington's disease , 2001, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[6]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Rank-order versus mean based statistics for neuroimaging , 2007, NeuroImage.

[7]  E. Vandenbussche,et al.  Cognitive changes in patients with Huntington’s disease (HD) and asymptomatic carriers of the HD mutation , 2004, Journal of Neurology.

[8]  Alberto Beltramello,et al.  A comparison between the accuracy of voxel‐based morphometry and hippocampal volumetry in Alzheimer's disease , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[9]  C. Kennard,et al.  Identification of an oculomotor biomarker of preclinical Huntington disease , 2006, Neurology.

[10]  J. Brandt,et al.  Reduced basal ganglia volume associated with the gene for Huntington's disease in asymptomatic at‐risk persons , 1994, Neurology.

[11]  G. Pearlson,et al.  Longitudinal change in basal ganglia volume in patients with Huntington's disease , 1997, Neurology.

[12]  C D Good,et al.  The distribution of structural neuropathology in pre-clinical Huntington's disease. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[13]  R. Yee,et al.  Oculomotor control in asymptomatic and recently diagnosed individuals with the genetic marker for Huntington’s disease , 2003, Vision Research.

[14]  G. Pearlson,et al.  Basal ganglia volume and proximity to onset in presymptomatic Huntington disease. , 1996, Archives of neurology.

[15]  Jane S. Paulsen,et al.  Unified Huntington's disease rating scale: Reliability and consistency , 1996, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[16]  R. Ferrante,et al.  Neuropathological Classification of Huntington's Disease , 1985, Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology.

[17]  Jan Kassubek,et al.  Thalamic atrophy in Huntington's disease co-varies with cognitive performance: a morphometric MRI analysis. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[18]  J Kassubek,et al.  Topography of cerebral atrophy in early Huntington’s disease: a voxel based morphometric MRI study , 2004, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[19]  C. Rorden,et al.  Stereotaxic display of brain lesions. , 2000, Behavioural neurology.

[20]  Robin L. Bennett,et al.  Laboratory Guidelines for Huntington Disease Genetic Testing , 1998 .

[21]  J. Brandt,et al.  A four-year prospective study of cognitive functioning in Huntington's disease , 2006, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[22]  J. Brandt,et al.  Predictors of neuropathological severity in 100 patients with Huntington's disease , 2003, Annals of neurology.

[23]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Voxel-Based Morphometry—The Methods , 2000, NeuroImage.